Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Paper
receptor solution is 2 mL. Solutions of the sensor of various
concentrations and increasing concentrations of cations and
anions were prepared separately. The spectra of these solutions
were recorded by means of UV-vis and fluorescence methods.
Conclusions
Thus, in conclusion, we have designed and synthesized a
pyrene based fluorophore that easily recognizes Cu2+ and F−
over other interfering cations and anions in CH3CN–HEPES-
buffer (7 : 3, v/v, pH = 7.5) and in acetonitrile solution respecti-
vely by the fluorescence change which makes it an efficient
sensor for possible analytical and biological use in the detec-
tion and determination of Cu2+ and F−.
Fig. 10 (a) The truth table of the OR gate and (b) the logic scheme of
the following gate, with the change in the emission spectra and the
output intensities (bar diagram) of BMPA upon reversing the chemical
inputs of Cu2+ and F−.
6.98 (d, 1H, J = 7.60), 6.97(t, 2H, J = 7.68), 1.28 (s, 3H), 1.25
(s, 3H). HRMS: M+ calculated for C34H26N2O2 is 494.2; found:
518.21 (M + 23 + H)+.
Acknowledgements
Authors thank the DST (SR/S1/0C-58/2010) (Govt. of India) and
UGC (for a fellowship to S. P.) for financial support and
SC thanks TCG Life Sciences Ltd (Chembiotek), Kolkata for
spectral help and Mr M. Adak for assistance.
13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz). δ (ppm): 193.32, 155.75,
152.85, 135.93, 134.09, 131.69, 130.85, 129.61, 129.30, 128.50,
127.83, 127.57, 127.19, 126.93, 126.56, 125.11, 124.92, 123.42,
122.74, 122.26, 120.61, 116.35, 115.48. Anal calculated:
C 82.57; H 5.30; N 5.66.
Notes and references
Syntheses of the complexes (BMPA-Cu complex). To a hot
1.0 mL methanolic solution containing 20 mg (0.40 mmol) of
the ligand, 1.0 mL of a methanolic solution containing 70 mg
(0.40 mmol) of CuCl2·2H2O was added. A deep blue turbidity
appears immediately. After stirring for 1.0 h at 50 °C the blue
complexes were filtered, collected and then washed several
times with cold methanol. The complex was dried in a desicca-
tor over anhydrous CaCl2 under vacuum. The dried ligand
and complexes were subjected to spectroscopic analyses.
The complexes are air-stable, non-hygroscopic, and soluble
in H2O ethanol, methanol, DMSO, and DMF. CuBMPA
(C34H26N2O2Cu): yield 80%. Colour blue. Mp >280 °C.
MS (FD). M+ calculated for C34H26N2O2Cu is 557.74; found:
558.10 (BMPA + Cu2+ + H+).
1 (a) P. D. Beer and P. A. Gale, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
40, 486; (b) V. Amendola, D. E. Gómez, L. Fabbrizzi and
M. Licchelli, Acc. Chem. Res., 2006, 39, 343; (c) S. Goswami,
A. Manna, S. Paul, A. K. Das, K. Aich and P. K. Nandi,
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2912; (d) S. Goswami, A. Manna,
S. Paul, K. Aich, A. K. Das and S. Chakraborty, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2013, 14, 1785; (e) S. Goswami, A. Manna, S. Paul,
K. Aich, A. K. Das and S. Chakraborty, Dalton Trans., 2013,
42, 8078; (f) S. Goawami, S. Paul and A. Manna, RSC. Adv.,
2013, 3, 10639; (g) S. Goawami, S. Paul and A. Manna,
Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 10097; (h) S. Goawami, S. Paul and
A. Manna, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 10682; (i) S. Goswami,
A. Manna, K. Aich and S. Paul, Chem. Lett., 2012, 41, 1600.
2 (a) S. Goswami, A. Hazra, R. Chakraborty and H. K. Fun,
Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 4350–4353; (b) S. Goswami, A. Hazra
and M. K. Das, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010, 51, 3320–3323;
(c) G. W. Bates, P. A. Gale and M. E. Light, Chem. Commun.,
2007, 2121–2123; (d) A. Szumna and J. Jurczak, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2001, 4031–4039.
Calculation of the detection limit
The detection limit (DL) of BMPA for Cu(II) and F− was deter-
mined using the following equation. DL = K × Sb1/S where K =
2 or 3 (we take 2 in this case), Sb1 is the standard deviation of
the blank solution and S is the slope of the calibration curve.
3 (a) J. L. Sessler, S. Camiolo and P. A. Gale, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 2003, 240, 17–53; (b) J. L. Sessler, D. An, W. S. Cho,
V. Lynch and M. Marquez, Chem. Commun., 2005, 540–542.
4 (a) C. Caltagirone, G. W. Bates, P. A. Gale and M. E. Light,
Chem. Commun., 2008, 61–63; (b) E. J. Cho, B. J. Ryu,
Y. J. Lee and K. C. Nam, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 2607–2609.
5 (a) F. M. Pfeffer, T. Gunnlaugsson, P. Jensen and
P. E. Kruger, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 5357–5360; (b) K. Choi and
A. D. Hamilton, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2003, 240, 101–110.
6 (a) S. K. Kim, B.-G. Kang, H. S. Koh, Y. J. Yoon, S. J. Jung,
B. Jeong, K. D. Lee and J. Yoon, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4655–
General method of UV-vis and fluorescence titrations
By UV-vis and fluorescence method. For UV-vis and fluo-
rescence titrations, a stock solution of the sensor was prepared
(c = 2 × 10−5 mL−1) in CH3CN–HEPES-buffer (7 : 3, v/v, at pH
7.5) for cation titration. The solution of the guest cation was
prepared (2 × 10−4 mL−1) in CH3CN–H2O (7 : 3, v/v, at pH 7.5)
at pH 7.5 by using 20 mM HEPES buffer. For anion titration, a
stock solution of the sensor was prepared (c = 2 × 10−5 mL−1
in CH3CN (pH = 7.5). The solution of the guest anion was pre-
pared (2 × 10−4 mL−1) in CH3CN. The original volume of the
)
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 3037–3044 | 3043