3174
W. Liu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 3172–3175
formed with the two triazine rings, forming lone pair electron–
interactions with the triazine rings and weak hydrogen bonding
p
were calculated based on fluorescence titration curves using a
Hyperquad 2003 software,9 which are listed in Table 1. It is notice-
able from Table 1 that the host 4 shows decreased association con-
stants with anions compared to the parent dichloro-substituted
tetraoxacalix[2]arene[2]triazine 2,4d,4f probably due to the increas-
ing electron density on the triazine rings by the electron-donating
p-tolyl groups. The different substituents on the larger-rim of the
benzene rings slightly affect the association constants. For exam-
ple, the host 5, with a benzyloxy group attached on the benzene
rings, shows higher affinity towards the anions than 4. As the
bridge oxygen atoms tend to conjugate with the triazine rings
rather than benzene rings (Figs. S1–S2), the introduced benzyloxy
groups on the benzene rings are expected to barely affect the elec-
tronic density of the triazine rings. Then we speculated that the
electronic donating effect of the benzyloxy groups might increase
the electronic density of the benzene rings and hence facilitates
the counter cation association. To verify the hypothesis, we inves-
tigated the effect of cations on the association constants. As shown
in Table 1, while the different counter cations barely affected the
association constants for 4 and chloride, they resulted in increased
with the aryl hydrogen atoms (OÁ Á Á = 3.432 Å, OÁ Á ÁH–C = 3.375 Å,
p
Fig. 1A and B). Meanwhile, the other two sides of the water mole-
cule are also surrounded by another V-shaped cavity of two ben-
zene rings from the adjacent host molecule bearing short OÁ Á Á
p
distances (3.150 Å) and possible weak hydrogen bonding with the
two nitrogen atoms on the smaller rim of the triazine rings (O–
HÁ Á ÁN = 3.419 Å). The adjacent host molecules stack to each other
through
pÁ Á Áp interactions between the tolyl and triazine rings.
The multiple interactions eventually resulted in an interesting
stacked-badmintons-like self-assembly, in which a water channel
is formed (Fig. 1C and D). In the case of 3, an acetone molecule
was located above one of the triazine rings (Fig. S1B), approaching
the triazine ring through
r-type lone pair electron–p interaction,
which was indicated by the short O7acetoneÁ Á ÁC1triazine distance
(3.056 Å). In addition, the acetone molecule also forms a hydrogen
bond with one of the hydroxyl groups from the other host molecule
(OÁ Á ÁH–O = 2.710 Å). The coexistence of lone pair electron–
p
interactions and intermolecular hydrogen bonds hence led to a
ladder-like self-assembly motif in solid state (Fig. S1C).
association constants for
5 and chloride by an order of
We first examined the recognition properties of 3–5 towards
anions including ClÀ, BrÀ, SCNÀ, NOÀ3 , HSOÀ4 and H2POÀ4 by means
of spectroscopic titrations. Job’s plots indicated the formation of
1:1 complexes between the host molecules and the anions tested
(Fig. 2C and Fig. S3). As illustrated in Figure 2A and Figures
S4–S25, the addition of anions quenched the emission at 334 nm
and 463 nm for 3, 334 nm and 445 nm for 4, and 409 nm for 5,
respectively. The association constants (Ka(1:1)) of the complexes
Bu4N+(5ÁCl)À < Pro4N+(5ÁCl)À < Et4N+(5ÁCl)À < Me4N+(5ÁCl)À,
indi-
cating enhanced cation binding within the V-shaped cavity of the
two benzene rings by attaching the benzyloxy groups. With hydro-
xyl groups attached on the larger-rim of benzene rings, the host 3
gives the highest affinity towards the anions. While the cation
effects could not be excluded, the cooperative anion–p and hydro-
gen bonding interactions are probably the main contributions for
the enhanced binding.4r In addition, association constants listed
B
C
A
D
H3
O
H2
O
N
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
H1
O
OH
Figure 2. (A) Fluorescence titration curves of 3 (2.0 Â 10À4 M in 2 mL acetonitrile) upon the addition of Bu4NBr (0, 2.50, 4.99, 7.49, 9.99, 12.49, 14.98, 17.48, 19.98, 22.47,
24.97, 27.47, 29.96, 32.46, 34.96, 37.46 Â 10À4 M, respectively). The excitation wavelength is 300 nm. (B) The least-square nonlinear fitting (at 463 nm) with a Hyperquad
2003 program. (C) Job’s plot of the complex of 3 and Bu4NBr with a total concentration of 1.1 Â 10À2 M. (D) Partial 1H NMR spectra of 3 (1.06 Â 10À2 M in 0.5 mL of d6-
acetone) upon the addition of Bu4NBr.