Organic Letters
Letter
couples symmetrical anhydrides and DHPs to afford
enantioenriched α-substituted ketones under mild condi-
tions.11 To the best of our knowledge, in such an active
field, the use of DHPs to construct Csp3−S or Csp3−Se bonds
has not been achieved. Very recently, our group has achieved a
nickel-catalyzed reductive thiolation and selenylation of
unactivated alkyl bromides12 and a nickel-catalyzed defluor-
inative reductive cross-coupling of gem-difluoroalkenes with
thio-/selenosulfonates.13 As a novel sulfuration reagent,
benzenesulfonothioate14 has some advantages compared to
other sulfuration agents (thiols, disulfides, sulfenyl halides,
sulfonium salts, N-thioimide quinone mono O,S-acetals, p-
toluenesulfonyl hydrazide S-acetals, arylsulfonyl chlorides,
sulfinic acids, and p-tolylsulfinate)15 such as being stable to
air, without unpleasant odors, and easy to prepare. Based on
our previous investigation of the thio-/selenosulfonates, we
wonder whether thio-/selenosulfonates might trap the radicals
generated by DHPs. If so, construction of Csp3−S bonds would
be accessible under photocatalyzed conditions. Herein, we
reported a visible-light-promoted cross-coupling of 4-alkyl-1,4-
dihydropyridines with thio-/selenosulfonates (Figure 1, c).
This protocol provided a novel synthetic route for the
construction of Csp3−S bonds or Csp3−Se bonds under
metal-free conditions. No metal, alkali, or oxidant involvement
is required compared to previous reports.
entries 4−6). Next, we screened reaction solvents. When DMF
was applied to the reaction, 3 was observed in 53% yield
(Table 1, entry 7). It should be noted that the reaction of 1a
and 2a in DCE gave 3 in 85% yield (Table 1, entry 8). After
carefully studying the reaction concentration, it was found that
2 mL of DCE was the ideal amount for this reaction and the
yield of 3 was increased to 99% (Table 1, entries 9 and 10).
Notably, by only altering the atmosphere to air, 1-(cyclo-
hexylsulfinyl)-4-methylbenzene 3′ was obtained in 95%
isolated yield (Table 1, entry 11).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we evaluated the
synthetic potential of this photomediated reaction (Table 1).
First, we focused our attention on radical precursors (Scheme
1). Importantly, secondary alkyl radicals such as cyclohexyl
Scheme 1. Substrate Scope of Various DHPs,
a b
,
Thiosulfonates, and Selenosulfonates
Initially, we studied the model reaction of cyclohexyl-DHP
(1a) with S-(p-tolyl) benzenesulfonothioate (2a) in MeCN
catalyzed by fac-Ir(ppy)3 under irradiation of 40 W blue LED
light. To our delight, it was found that the desired
cyclohexyl(p-tolyl)sulfane 3 was obtained in 77% isolated
yield (Table 1, entry 1). No desired product was detected in
a
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions
b
yield (%)
entry
P.C.
fac-Ir(ppy)3
fac-Ir(ppy)3
fac-Ir(ppy)3
[Ir(dtbbpy)(ppy)2][PF6]
EosinY
4-CzIPN
4-CzIPN
4-CzIPN
4-CzIPN
solvent
3
3′
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
MeCN (1)
MeCN (1)
MeCN (1)
MeCN (1)
MeCN (1)
MeCN (1)
DMF(1)
DCE (1)
DCE (1.5)
DCE (2)
77
0
0
c
4
5
6
7
8
9
64
76
81
53
85
91
99
0
a
Standard conditions: 1 (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), 4-CzIPN (3 mol
b
%), DCE (4 mL), 40 W LED, rt under N2 for 24 h. Isolated yields.
0
0
95
radical, cyclopentyl radical, and isopropyl radical are tolerated
well in this transformation (3-5). A pyran-derived DHP could
likewise be used, and the resulting sulfide was isolated in 88%
yield (6). Diethyl 4-(1-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)propan-2-
yl)-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate was
also tolerated under this transformation (7). More interest-
ingly, alkyl radicals bearing distal alkenes were compatible with
such mild reaction conditions (8). α-Nitrogen radicals were
also tested, and a series of N,S-acetal derivatives were furnished
in excellent yields (9−12). Similar results were achieved for
primary alkyl radical (13). α-Oxygen radicals could also be
employed, which brought about the introduction of dioxolane
motif (14).
10
11
4-CzIPN
4-CzIPN
d
DCE (2)
a
Reaction conditions: diethyl 4-cyclohexyl-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydro-
pyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate (1a, 0.30 mmol), S-(p-tolyl) benzenesulfo-
nothioate (2a, 0.10 mmol), P.C. (3 mol %), in solvent at room
temperature for 24 h under N2, 40 W LED. Yields were determined
b
c
d
by GC. In the dark. Under air.
the absence of photocatalyst or in the dark (Table 1, entries 2
and 3). These results indicate that both photocatalyst and
visible-light irradiation are absolute requirements for this
reaction. We further examined the effect of other photo-
catalysts ([Ir(dtbbpy)(ppy)2][PF6], EosinY and 4-CzIPN). 4-
CzIPN ($6.01/g) is the best choice for this reaction (Table 1,
Next, we turned our attention to investigate whether other
sulfonothioates can be employed as radical receptors using
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX