Dihydride Complexes of the Cobalt and Iron Group Metals
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 118, No. 48, 1996 12139
mechanism outlined below:
> Rh > Co. While the nature of the central metal atom seems
to be the primary factor determining the facility of these
rearrangements, changes in the tetradentate ligand also have an
effect. Field and co-workers report an activation energy of 15.3
kcal/mol for hydride site exchange in PP3FeH2 (PP3 ) P(CH2-
CH2CH2PMe2)3).24
This mechanism would require relatively little movement of the
heavy atoms. Rapid rotation of the dihydrogen ligand would
facilitate the exchange process. Some M-H bond breaking is
required, so the observed trends in the activation energy for
rearrangement are consistent with the reported observation that
M-H bonds are stronger for the second- and third-row metals
than for first-row metals.30
Hydride site exchange in complexes of the general type H2M-
(PR3)4 has been the subject of extensive mechanistic study.25
While the topology of the dynamic process is well understood,
detailed understanding of the mechanism is limited. Based on
permutational considerations, Muetterties and co-workers pro-
posed mechanisms described as a tetrahedral jump or trigonal
twist for various metal and ligand combinations.25 Only recently
has the possibility been considered that a dihydrogen species
could be on the reaction coordinate. Studies by Berke and co-
workers26 of hydride site exchange in complexes of the form
Re(CO)(NO)H2(PR3)2 using a combination of experimental and
computational methods suggest the intermediacy of a dihydrogen
complex in this rearrangement.
Conclusion
In contrast to previous reports, we find that the cationic
complexes [(PP3)CoH2]+ and [(PP3)RhH2]+ are correctly for-
mulated as dihydrides. The large isotope shifts in the 1H NMR
spectra observed upon deuteration have been quantitatively
analyzed in terms of isotopic perturbation effects. A mechanism
for the hydride rearrangement involving a transition state with
substantial H-H interactions is proposed based on the observed
kinetic isotope effect.
In principle, mechanistic insight can be gained by measure-
ment of the kinetic isotope effect upon replacement of hydride
ligands with deuterium. To this end, we have studied carefully
the 1H{31P} NMR spectra of mixtures of 2 and 2-d1. By
inspection, the spectra in the temperature range 260-300 K
show that the rearrangement is slightly faster for 2. Simulation
of the observed line shapes leads to kH/kD ) 1.3(1). Within
experimental error, this isotope effect is temperature indepen-
dent. This is the first report of a kinetic isotope effect in an
intramolecular hydride rearrangement of this type. It should
be noted that our measurement differs from other data on
processes such as reductive elimination reactions, where a
dideuteride is usually compared to a dihydride complex. In our
Experimental Section
All syntheses and chemical manipulations were conducted under Ar
or N2 using standard Schlenk and vacuum line techniques. Toluene,
tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, pentane, and heptane were distilled from
NaK/benzophenone; ethanol was distilled from magnesium (all under
dry nitrogen). Distilled water, dimethylformamide, and acetone were
purged with argon before use. Deuterated solvents were purchased
from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, degassed, and stored in Pyrex
bulbs fitted with Kontes vacuum valves. Tetrahydrofuran-d8 and
benzene-d6 were dried over NaK/benzophenone, and acetone-d6 was
dried over activated molecular sieves.
1
case, we chose to examine a monodeuteride so that H NMR
spectra of both the dihydride and hydridodeuteride could be
recorded in the same sample, eliminating systematic errors such
as temperature variations. Had we been able to accurately
measure the rate of rearrangement for the dideuteride in
comparison to the dihydride complex, the KIE would have been
larger.
The observation of a KIE for the rearrangement process
suggests that the M-H interactions change significantly between
the ground state and the transition state. Our observations can
be put in context by noting that isotope effects for reductive
elimination of hydrogen are generally modest, and in some cases
inverse effects have been reported (kH/kD < 1).27 A highly
relevant comparison can be made to the observations reported
by Hoff and co-workers, who found kH/kD ) 1.08 ( 0.04 for
the conversion of a tungsten dihydride complex to the corre-
sponding dihydrogen species.28 Based on our observed KIE,
we postulate that the rearrangement reaction in 2 may proceed
Via a transition state with some degree of H-H bonding. The
tetradentate ligand system used here is known to stabilize five
coordinate trigonal bipyramidal complexes,29 so we suggest the
1H NMR spectra were obtained on Bruker AC-200, AF-300, and
WM-500 spectrometers. Chemical shifts were referenced against
residual protio solvent and are reported in ppm relative to TMS. 31P-
{1H} NMR spectra were recorded on the Bruker AC-200 instrument
at 81 MHz with chemical shifts relative to an external 85% H3PO4
standard. 1H{31P} spectra were recorded on the Bruker WM-500
1
instrument referenced to TMS. Variable-temperature H{31P} NMR
experiments used a Bruker B-VT 1000 temperature controller with
copper/constantan thermocouple. All temperatures were calibrated
using the 1H chemical shifts of methanol.31 Simulations of NMR spectra
were obtained on a Macintosh Quadra 900 using the Dynamac program.
CoCl2 was obtained from Aldrich Chemicals, dried under vacuum
at 180 °C for 24 h and stored under Ar. Et3OPF6, NaBH4, PPh3
(Aldrich), and P(CH2CH2PPh2)3 (Strem Chemicals) were used without
further purification. RhCl3‚3H2O was prepared from rhodium residues
following the procedure of Anderson and co-workers.32 HB-
16
(Ar′)4‚(Et2O)2,33 (PPh3)4RhH,14 PP3CoH,34 PP3IrCl,15 and PP3FeH2
were prepared following literature procedures.
In the six-coordinate complexes PA indicates the bridgehead phos-
phorus, PQ and PQ′ the two axial PPh2 groups, and PM the equatorial
PPh2 group. The 1H NMR spectra of all compounds studied are
consistent with previously published data.
(24) Field, L. D.; Bampos, N.; Messerle, B. A. Magn. Reson. Chem.
1991, 29, 36-39.
[PP3CoH2]PF6 (1). PP3CoH (30 mg, 0.041 mmol) was dissolved
in 5 mL of diethyl ether to give a bright yellow solution. Dropwise
(25) For summaries of the extensive early work on this problem, cf.:
(a) Muetterties, E. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1970, 3, 266-273. (b) Jesson, J. P.;
Muetterties, E. L. In Dynamic Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy;
Jackman, L. M., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1975; p 277. (c) Jesson,
J. P.; Meakin, P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1973, 6, 269-275.
(26) Bakhmutov, V.; Bu¨rgi, T.; Burger, P.; Ruppli, U.; Berke, H.
Organometallics 1994, 13, 4203-4213.
.
addition of HPF6 Et2O (freshly prepared by stoichiometric reaction of
ethanol with Et3OPF6) immediately affords a reddish brown precipitate.
(29) Sacconi, L.; Mani, F. Transition Met. Chem. 1984, 8, 179-252.
(30) Cf.: Wang, D.; Angelici, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 935-
942 and references therein.
(27) Bullock, R. M. In Transition Metal Hydrides; Dedieu, A., Ed.;
VCH: New York, 1992; p 296. See also: Abu-Hasanayn, F.; Krogh-
Jesperson, K.; Goldman, A. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8019-8023
and references therein.
(28) Zhang, K.; Gonzalez, A. A.; Hoff, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989,
111, 3627-3632.
(31) Van Geet, A. L. Anal. Chem. 1970, 42, 679-680.
(32) Anderson, S. N.; Basolo, F. Inorg. Synth. 1963, 7, 214-220.
(33) Brookhart, M.; Grant, B.; Volpe, A. F., Jr. Organometallics 1992,
11, 3920-3922.
(34) Ghilardi, C. A.; Midollini, S.; Sacconi, L. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14,
1790-1795.