2058
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2058-2059
Total Synthesis of the Polyene Macrolide
Roflamycoin
Scott D. Rychnovsky,* Uday R. Khire, and Guang Yang
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of California
IrVine, California 92697-2025
ReceiVed NoVember 1, 1996
Figure 1. Roflamycoin spiroacetal formed irreversibly on treatment
of natural roflamycoin with mild acid.
Roflamycoin is an unusual member of the polyene macrolide
antibiotics as it is the only oxopolyene macrolide that has been
shown to form well-defined ion channels.1 Most oxopolyene
macrolides are simple membrane disrupters, and the other well-
characterized ion-channel forming polyenes belong to the
mycosamine-containing polyene macrolide antibiotics like nys-
tatin and amphotericin B.2 Roflamycoin was isolated from
Streptomyces roseoflaVus as an antifungal agent and initially
named flavomycoin.3 The flat structure was reported in 1981,4
and the absolute configuration was determined in 1994 using
the 13C acetonide method.5 Prior to the stereochemical elucida-
tion, both Lipshutz6 and Rychnovsky7 had developed partial
syntheses of roflamycoin stereoisomers, but no complete
synthesis of roflamycoin or any stereoisomer has been described.
Reported herein is the first total synthesis of natural roflamycoin.
Roflamycoin presents several challenges to synthetic chemists.
In common with other oxopolyene macrolides like mycoticin8
and roxaticin,9 roflamycoin contains a stereochemically complex
polyol chain and a polyene segment that is sensitive both to
light and to many chemical reagents. Unlike these simpler
oxopolyenes, roflamycoin contains a hemiacetal that is trans-
formed to a spiroacetal irreVersibly on treatment with mild acid
(Figure 1).5 All of the synthetic work in this area makes use
of acid labile protecting groups to block the many hydroxyl
groups in the target, so a late-stage acid-catalyzed deprotection
would appear to be unavoidable.10 A two-stage deprotection
strategy was developed for the synthesis of roflamycoin in which
the hydroxyl groups were to be deprotected in the penultimate
step and the ketone would be liberated in the final step by neutral
periodate cleavage of a 1,2-diol. Model studies were successful,
and this deprotection strategy was incorporated into the synthetic
plan for roflamycoin.
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Convergent synthesis of the protected roflamycoin polyol 15
used cyanohydrin acetonide couplings11 and optically pure C2-
symmetric electrophiles12 previously developed in our group.
(1) (a) Schlegel, R.; Grigorjev, P. A.; Thrum, H. Stud. Biophys. 1982,
92, 135-40. (b) Grigorjev, P.; Schlegel, R.; Thrum, H.; Ermishkin, L.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 821, 297-304.
(2) Bolard, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1986, 864, 257-304.
(3) (a) Schlegel, R.; Thrum, H. Experientia 1968, 24, 11-12. (b)
Schlegel, R.; Thrum, H. J. Antibiot. 1971, 24, 368-74. (c) Schlegel, R.;
Thrum, H. J. Antibiot. 1971, 24, 360-7. (d) Afzal, M.; Nimer, N. D.; Nazar,
M. Z. Allg. Mikrobiol. 1983, 23, 411-8.
The major segments of roflamycoin, compounds 6 and 11, were
prepared as outlined in Schemes 1 and 2. The C11-C22
segment 6 was prepared by joining diepoxide 1 and dibromide
4 with a dithiane unit (Scheme 1). To diepoxide 1, prepared
by Noyori hydrogenation of 1,5-dichloro-2,4-pentandione,12 was
added (benzyloxy)methyllithium.13 Monoaddition predominates
when BF3‚OEt2 was used as a promoter.12,14 The 2,2-bis-
(tributyltin)dithiane (2)15 was transmetallated with BuLi and
added to the hydroxy oxirane to give 56% yield of the anti-
diol 3. Acetonide protection, transmetallation, and alkylation
with excess dibromide 4 gave dithiane 5 in 60% overall yield.
The stannylated dithiane was required to facilitate the second
metallation reaction.6b,15 Compound 5 has all of the carbons
(4) Schlegel, R.; Thrum, H.; Zielinski, J.; Borowski, E. J. Antibiot. 1981,
34, 122-3.
(5) (a) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Griesgraber, G.; Schlegel, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 197-210. (b) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Griesgraber, G.; Schlegel,
R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 2623-4.
(6) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Kotsuki, H.; Lew, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986,
27, 4825-8. (b) Lipshutz, B. H.; Moretti, R.; Crow, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1989, 30, 15-18.
(7) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Griesgraber, G.; Kim, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 2621-2.
(8) Synthesis of mycoticin: Poss, C. S.; Rychnovsky, S. D.; Schreiber,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3360-1.
(9) Syntheses of roxaticin: (a) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Hoye, R. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 1753-65. (b) Mori, Y.; Asai, M.; Kawade, J.-I.;
Okumura, A.; Furukawa, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6503-6. (c) Mori,
Y.; Asai, M.; Okumura, A.; Furukawa, H. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 5299-
314. (d) Mori, Y.; Asai, M.; Kawade, J.-i.; Furukawa, H. Tetrahedron 1995,
51, 5315-30.
(12) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Griesgraber, G.; Zeller, S.; Skalitzky, D. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5161-9.
(10) (a) Beau, J. M. In Recent Progress in the Chemical Synthesis of
Antibiotics; Lukacs, G., Ohno, M., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1990; pp 135-
182. (b) Rychnovsky, S. D. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2021-40.
(11) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Zeller, S.; Skalitzky, D. J.; Griesgraber, G. J.
Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5550-1.
(13) Still, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1482-7.
(14) Eis, M. J.; Wrobel, J. E.; Ganem, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
3693-4.
(15) Seebach, D.; Willert, I.; Beck, A. K.; Grobel, B.-T. HelV. Chim.
Acta 1978, 61, 2510-23.
S0002-7863(96)03800-0 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society