RESEARCH
| REPORTS
8-methoxy-1,2,3,4-etrahydroquinoline, based on 13C–
nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of the crude
reaction product (figs. S5 and S6). Secondary al-
cohols likewise participated readily in the Mit-
sunobu and aza-annulation reactions, 9e→10e→11e
(entry 5). This two-step sequence, when con-
ducted using the chiral alcohol 9f, showed no
loss of stereochemical integrity (entry 6). Incor-
poration of a heteroatom into the ring closure, e.g.,
9g→10g→11g (entry 7), did not perturb the che-
mistry and provided easy access to the dihydro-
benzoxazine class of heterocycles. The yield declined
somewhat for making the five-membered dihy-
droindole 11h from alcohol 9h (entry 8), but
improved for the seven-membered tetrahydro-
benzazepine 11i from 9i (entry 9).
As a beginning toward gaining insight into the
mechanism of the amination, a 1:1 mixture of
naphthalene (7q) and 7q-d8 was treated with a
limited amount of amination reagent (4a, 0.5
equiv.) under otherwise standard reaction condi-
tions. Samples were taken and quenched at 10,
20, 30, and 40 min. Analysis via selected ion
monitoring–liquid chromatography–mass spec-
trometry revealed that the product ratios remained
constant at ~1:1, a ratio inconsistent with an orga-
nometallic C-H activation pathway, which would
typically manifest ~3:1 or higher ratios (40, 41).
Based on DFT calculations, we previously sug-
gested that aziridination of alkenes involves the
dirhodium-nitrenoid intermediate B shown in
Fig. 4 that arises from overall NH transfer from the
DPH-aminating reagent to the dirhodium catalyst
(33). In contrast, reaction of O-tosylhydroxylamine
reagents with the dirhodium catalyst favor inter-
mediate A because TsO– is weakly basic and the
equilibrium with intermediate B lies far to the
left. The chemoselectivity might be explained by
the more electrophilic nature of intermediate A
versus nitrenoid B. This preliminary hypothesis
is consistent with the observation that moderate-to-
strong bases such as K2CO3, Et3N, and pyridine
completely inhibit amination, but not aziridina-
tion. Moreover, addition of TsOH (1.5 equiv.) to
the reaction of 1 with 2,4-DNPONHMe (12) pro-
duced only the arene amination adduct 5 and no
aziridine. As an additional control, it was shown
that the presence of 2,4-DNP-OH (1.5 equiv.) did
not alter the reaction manifold in favor of aziridi-
nation when 4a was used as the aminating reagent
and only 5 was observed.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
30. C. Suzuki, K. Hirano, T. Satoh, M. Miura, Org. Lett. 17,
1597–1600 (2015).
31. K. Takamatsu, K. Hirano, T. Satoh, M. Miura, J. Org. Chem. 80,
3242–3249 (2015).
32. N. A. Romero, K. A. Margrey, N. E. Tay, D. A. Nicewicz, Science
349, 1326–1330 (2015).
1. R. Hili, A. K. Yudin, Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 284–287 (2006).
2. A. Ricci, Ed., Amino Group Chemistry: From Synthesis to the
Life Sciences (Wiley-VCH, 2008).
3. R. J. Angelici, Reagents for Transition Metal Complex and
Organometallic Synthesis (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1990), vol. 28.
4. A. Dalla Cort et al., J. Org. Chem. 70, 8877–8883 (2005).
5. N. R. Candeias, L. C. Branco, P. M. P. Gois, C. A. M. Afonso,
A. F. Trindade, Chem. Rev. 109, 2703–2802 (2009).
6. J. F. Hartwig, S. Shekhar, Q. Shen, F. Barrios-Landeros, Chem.
Anilines 1, 455–536 (2007).
7. Y.-S. Xie et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 54, 5151–5154 (2013).
8. J.Yu,P.Zhang, J.Wu, Z.Shang, Tetrahedron Lett. 54, 3167–3170 (2013).
9. T. Daskapan, ARKIVOC 2011, 230–262 (2011).
10. K. Kunz, U. Scholz, D. Ganzer, Synlett (15): 2428–2439 (2003).
11. J. F. Hartwig, Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 1534–1544 (2008).
12. D. S. Surry, S. L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 6338–6361 (2008).
13. N. Xia, M. Taillefer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 337–339 (2009).
14. X. Zeng, W. Huang, Y. Qiu, S. Jiang, Org. Biomol. Chem. 9,
8224–8227 (2011).
15. R. J. Lundgren, M. Stradiotto, Aldrichim Acta 45, 59–65 (2012).
16. T. Maejima et al., Tetrahedron 68, 1712–1722 (2012).
17. H. M. L. Davies, X. Dai, Synthetic reactions via C-H bond
activation: Carbene and nitrene C-H insertion, in
Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III, R. H. Crabtree,
D. M. P. Mingos, Eds. (Elsevier, 2007), vol. 10, pp. 167–212.
18. J. Jiao, K. Murakami, K. Itami, ACS Catal. 6, 610–633 (2016).
19. P. Starkov, T. F. Jamison, I. Marek, Chemistry 21, 5278–5300 (2015).
20. W. C. P. Tsang, N. Zheng, S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
127, 14560–14561 (2005).
21. K. Inamoto, T. Saito, M. Katsuno, T. Sakamoto, K. Hiroya, Org.
Lett. 9, 2931–2934 (2007).
22. G. Brasche, S. L. Buchwald, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 1932–1934 (2008).
23. K. Inamoto, T. Saito, K. Hiroya, T. Doi, J. Org. Chem. 75,
3900–3903 (2010).
33. J. L. Jat et al., Science 343, 61–65 (2014).
34. Z. Yang, Synlett 25, 1186–1187 (2014).
35. O. R. S. John et al., Org. Lett. 9, 4009–4012 (2007).
36. J. Mendiola et al., Org. Process Res. Dev. 13, 263–267 (2009).
37. L. A. Carpino, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 3133–3135 (1960).
38. M. Cherest, X. Lusinchi, Tetrahedron Lett. 30, 715–718 (1989).
39. M. Kawase, Y. Kikugawa, Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 29,
1615–1623 (1981).
40. W. D. Jones, Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 140–146 (2003).
41. E. M. Simmons, J. F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51,
3066–3072 (2012).
42. C. G. Espino, K. W. Fiori, M. Kim, J. Du Bois, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
126, 15378–15379 (2004).
43. L. S. Hegedus, Transition Metals in the Synthesis of Complex Organic
Molecules (University Science Books, 1994), pp. 16–22.
44. C. G. Espino, J. Du Bois, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40, 598–600 (2001).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
J.R.F. thanks NIH (grant HL034300, HL111392, DK038226) and the
Robert A. Welch Foundation (grant I-0011) for funding.
L.K. gratefully acknowledges the generous financial support of Rice
University, NIH (grant R01 GM-114609-01), NSF (CAREER:SusChEM
CHE-1455335), the Robert A. Welch Foundation (grant C-1764),
American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (grant
51707-DNI1), Amgen (2014 Young Investigators’ Award to L.K.),
and Biotage (2015 Young Principal Investigator Award). A
provisional patent application (patent no. 62/360,859) has been
submitted and assigned jointly to University of Texas Southwestern
and Rice University.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
24. R. Shrestha, P. Mukherjee, Y. Tan, Z. C. Litman, J. F. Hartwig,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8480–8483 (2013).
25. Y. Xue et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 7481–7488 (2014).
26. Z. Chen et al., Org. Chem. Front. 2, 1107–1295 (2015).
27. Y. Park, K. T. Park, J. G. Kim, S. Chang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137,
4534–4542 (2015).
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S4
Table S1
References (45–61)
28. K. Shin, H. Kim, S. Chang, Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1040–1052 (2015).
29. F. Sun, Z. Gu, Org. Lett. 17, 2222–2225 (2015).
12 April 2016; accepted 18 August 2016
10.1126/science.aaf8713
ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE
Spatiotemporal microbial evolution
on antibiotic landscapes
Michael Baym,1 Tami D. Lieberman,1* Eric D. Kelsic,1 Remy Chait,1† Rotem Gross,2
Idan Yelin,2 Roy Kishony1,2,3
‡
A key aspect of bacterial survival is the ability to evolve while migrating across spatially
varying environmental challenges. Laboratory experiments, however, often study evolution in
well-mixed systems. Here, we introduce an experimental device, the microbial evolution and
growth arena (MEGA)–plate, in which bacteria spread and evolved on a large antibiotic landscape
(120 × 60 centimeters) that allowed visual observation of mutation and selection in a migrating
bacterial front. While resistance increased consistently, multiple coexisting lineages diversified
both phenotypically and genotypically. Analyzing mutants at and behind the propagating front, we
found that evolution is not always led by the most resistant mutants; highly resistant mutants
may be trapped behind more sensitive lineages.The MEGA-plate provides a versatile platform for
studying microbial adaption and directly visualizing evolutionary dynamics.
It was also instructive to compare our meth-
odology with the intermolecular Rh-catalyzed
amination procedure of Du Bois to gain a perspec-
tive on their respective complementary chemo-
selectivities (Fig. 4) (42). Both have similar efficiency
using p-ethylanisole (13), but the Du Bois procedure
leads to benzylic C-H insertion only, whereas our
methodology gives arene amination exclusively,
providing 15 and 16 in a combined 67% yield.
The influence of ligands and counterions on
the reactivity of organometallics is well prece-
dented (43, 44). However, examples of such drama-
tic bifurcation of the reaction manifold are rare
and warrant closer study to understand the ener-
getics and full synthetic potential of this metalloid-
nitrogen umpolung for direct arene aminations.
he worldwide increase in antibiotic resist-
ance has motivated numerous studies aimed
at understanding the phenotypic and geno-
typic evolution of antibiotic resistance (1–7).
These experiments have shed light on the
and multidrug environments (5, 6, 8, 9). However,
most of our current knowledge about the evolu-
tion of resistance is based on laboratory setups
with well-mixed environments (1–7, 10, 11).
In natural and clinical settings, bacteria migrate
between spatially distinct regions of selection
T
trade-offs constraining adaptive evolution in single-
SCIENCE sciencemag.org
9 SEPTEMBER 2016 • VOL 353 ISSUE 6304 1147