Distortions of Meso-Dialkyl-Substituted Porphyrins
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 37, No. 8, 1998 2011
for C26H24N4Cu‚(H2O)0.25: C, 67.81; H, 5.36; N, 12.16. Found: C,
67.67; H, 5.03; N, 12.01.
Table 1. Data Acquisition and Structure Refinement Parameters
for Cu(dtBuP), Ni(diPrP), and Zn(diPrP)(py)
Zn(dPrP) was prepared using the same procedure as described for
Zn(dPP) and recrystallized from CH2Cl2/cyclohexane. Mp: >300 °C.
NMR: δH (ppm) (CDCl3 + 10 equiv of pyridine) 10.02 (s, 2H, Hmeso),
9.64 (d, 4H, â-H), 9.37 (d, 4H, â-H), 5.08 (t, 4H, R-CH2), 2.58 (m,
4H, â-CH2), 1.31 (t, 6H, CH3). Anal. Calcd for C26H24N4Zn‚-
(H2O)0.5: C, 66.89; H, 5.40; N, 12.00. Found: C, 67.10; H, 5.23; N,
11.73.
Co(diPrP) was prepared using the same procedure as described for
Co(dPP) and recrystallized from CH2Cl2/cyclohexane. Mp: >300 °C.
NMR: δH (ppm) (CDCl3) 27.5 (br, 2H, Hmeso), 16.48 (br, 4H, â-H),
15.32 (br, 4H, â-H), 12.99 (br, 2H, CH), 6.26 (br, 12H, CH3). Anal.
Calcd for C26H24N4Co: C, 69.48; H, 5.36; N, 12.41. Found: C, 69.01;
H, 5.48; N, 12.34.
Cu(dtBuP)
Ni(diPrP)
Zn(diPrP)(py)
empirical formula C28H28N4Cu C26H24N4Ni
C31H29N5Zn
537.0
red
formula wt
cryst color
cryst syst
space group
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
484.1
451.2
red
purple
monoclinic
P21/n
8.026(2)
25.745(5)
10.808(2)
90
92.39(3)
90
2231.4(8)
4
orthorhombic triclinic
Pbca
18.466(4)
12.120(2)
18.493(4)
90
P1h
10.198(3)
15.605(4)
16.815(3)
89.34(2)
79.84(2)
75.85(2)
2552.7(11)
4
R (deg)
â (deg)
90
90
γ (deg)
V (Å3)
4138.9(14)
8
0.046
0.122
0.914
Z
Cu(diPrP) was prepared using the same procedure as described for
Cu(dPP) and recrystallized from CH2Cl2/methanol. Mp: >300 °C.
Anal. Calcd for C26H24N4Cu‚(H2O)0.5: C, 67.15; H, 5.42; N, 12.05.
Found: C, 66.92; H, 5.12; N, 11.80.
R1 (obs. data)
wR2 (all data)
GOF (F2)
0.035
0.084
1.050
0.049
0.126
0.979
Zn(diPrP) was prepared using the same procedure as described for
Zn(dPP) and recrystallized from CHCl3/cyclohexane. Mp: >300 °C.
NMR: δH (ppm) (CDCl3 + 20 equiv of pyridine) 10.03 (s, 2H, Hmeso),
9.82 (d, 4H, â-H), 9.36 (d, 4H, â-H), 5.83 (m, 2H, CH), 2.50 (d, 12H,
CH3). Anal. Calcd for C26H24N4Zn: C, 68.20; H, 5.28; N, 12.24.
Found: C, 68.20; H, 5.60; N, 11.84.
Co(dtBuP) was prepared using the same procedure as described for
Co(dPP) and recrystallized from CH2Cl2/methanol. Mp: >300 °C.
NMR: δH (ppm) (CDCl3) 23.6 (br, 2H, Hmeso), 15.46 (br, 8H, â-H),
5.61 (br, 18H, CH3). Anal. Calcd for C28H28N4NCo: C, 70.14; H,
5.89; N, 11.68. Found: C, 69.35; H, 5.68; N, 11.43.
Cu(dtBuP) was prepared using the same procedure as described
for Cu(dPP) and recrystallized from CHCl3/toluene. Mp: >300 °C.
Anal. Calcd for C28H28N4Cu‚H2O: C, 66.98; H, 6.02; N, 11.16.
Found: C, 66.97; H, 5.68; N, 11.06.
Zn(dtBuP) was prepared using the same procedure as described for
Zn(dPP) and recrystallized from CHCl3/cyclohexane. Mp: >300 °C.
NMR: δH (ppm) 9.62 (d, 4H, â-H), 9.53 (s, 2H, Hmeso), 8.89 (d, 4H,
â-H), 2.43 (s, 18H, CH3). Anal. Calcd for C28H28N4Zn: C, 69.21; H,
5.81; N, 11.53. Found: C, 69.06; H, 5.42; N, 11.80.
Molecular Modeling Studies. Classical molecular mechanics
calculations have previously been used for predicting porphyrin
structures by our group,7,8,11a,13 Munro,14 Marques,15 and Kollman16 et
al. Molecular mechanics calculations were carried out using POLYGRAF
software (Molecular Simulations, Inc.). The porphyrin force field13a
was developed on the basis of the DREIDING II force field17 and the
normal coordinate analysis of NiOEP.18 The unconstrained equilibrium
bond length for the nickel-nitrogen(pyrrole) bond was set to 1.855 Å,
and the other equilibrium bond distances and angles were adjusted so
that the energy-minimized conformation of NiOEP matched the planar
crystal structure of NiOEP19 as closely as possible. This original force
field has been modified as follows: (1) Parameters for additional metals
were obtained by changing the equilibrium M-N bond distance Req
[1.855 Å for Ni(II), 1.930 Å for Co(II), 1.970 Å for Cu(II), and 2.070
Å for Zn(II)], the homonuclear nonbond separation Rnb [2.27 Å for
Ni(II), 3.40 Å for Co(II), 3.40 Å for Cu(II), and 4.54 Å for Zn(II)],
and the atomic mass [58.700 for Ni(II), 58.933 for Co(II), 63.546 for
Cu(II), and 65.380 for Zn(II)].11a Req of the metals is obtained by fitting
planar metalloporphyrin X-ray structures.20 (2) Electrostatic terms were
included in calculating the total energy.21 (3) The van der Waals
potential energy term for hydrogen atoms was changed from a Lennard-
Jones 6-12 to an exponential-6 functional form.22 (4) A cutoff distance
of 50 Å instead of 9 Å was employed when electrostatic and van der
Waals energy terms were calculated.22 (5) DREIDING II parameters
X-ray Crystallography. Crystals were transferred directly from
crystallization tubes to a light hydrocarbon oil (Paratone N), in which
they were examined and cut as necessary. Crystals were mounted on
glass fibers and placed on a Siemens R3 m/V diffractometer equipped
with graphite-monochromated Mo KR radiation from a normal-focus
sealed tube operating at 2.0 kW [Cu(dtBuP) and Zn(diPrP)(py)] or on
a Syntex P21 diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromated
Cu KR radiation from a normal-focus sealed tube operating at 2.0 kWa
[Ni(diPrP)]. The crystals were cooled to 130(2) K using a stream of
anhydrous nitrogen supplied from a locally modified Nonius low-
temperature apparatus (Siemens R3 m/V) or a Syntex LT-1 system
(Syntex P21). Data for Cu(dtBuP) were collected to 2θmax ) 45.0°
with ω scans in the index ranges 0 ) h ) 8, 0 ) k ) 27, -11 ) l )
11. A total of 3253 reflections were collected including 2927
independent reflections (Rint ) 0.023). Data for Zn(diPrP)(py) were
collected to 2θmax of 55.1° with ω scans in the index ranges 0 ) h )
13, -20 ) k ) 20, -21 ) l ) 21, for a total of 11 745 independent
reflections. Data for Ni(diPrP) were collected to 2θmax of 114.1° with
θ/2θ scans in the index ranges 0 ) h ) 14, 0 ) k ) 20, 0 ) l ) 21,
(13) (a) Shelnutt, J. A.; Medforth, C. J.; Berber, M. D.; Barkigia, K. M.;
Smith, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4077. (b) Shelnutt, J. A.;
Majumder, S. A.; Sparks, L. D.; Hobbs, J. D.; Medforth, C. J.; Senge,
M. O.; Smith, K. M.; Miura, M.; Luo L.; Quirke, J. M. E. J. Raman
Spectrosc. 1992, 23, 523. (c) Anderson, K. K.; Hobbs, J. D.; Luo, L.;
Stanley, K. D.; Quirke, J. M. E.; Shelnutt, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1993, 115, 12346. (d) Sparks, L. D.; Anderson, K. K.; Medforth, C.
J.; Smith, K. M.; Shelnutt, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 2297.
(14) (a) Munro, O. Q.; Marques, H. M.; Debrunner, P. G.; Mohanrao, K.;
Scheidt, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 935. (b) Munro, O. Q.;
Bradley, J. C.; Hancock, R. D.; Marques, H. M.; Marsicana, F. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 7218.
(15) (a) Marques H. M.; Munro, O. Q.; Grimmer, N. E.; Levendis, D. C.;
Marsicano, F.; Pattrick, G.; Markonlides, T. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 1995, 91, 1741. (b) Hancock, R. D.; Weaving, F. S.; Marques,
H. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989, 1177.
(16) (a) Kollman, P. A.; Grootenhuis, D. D. J.; Lopez, M. A. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1989, 61, 593. (b) Lopez, M. A.; Kollman, P. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1989, 111, 6212.
for a total of 3187 reflections and 2790 independent reflections (Rint
)
0.008). Structures were solved with direct methods and refined with
a full-matrix least-squares method (based on |F2| and all independent
reflections) using Siemens SHELXTL version 5.03 software. Hydrogen
atom positions were generated using idealized geometries and refined
using riding models. Empirical absorption corrections were applied
(XABS2).12 All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic
thermal parameters. Additional experimental details are presented in
Table 1.
(17) Mayo, S. L.; Olafson, B. D.; Goddard, W. A., III, J. Phys. Chem.
1990, 94, 8897.
(18) (a) Li, X.-Y.; Czernuszewics, R. S.; Kincaid, J. R.; Spiro, T. G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 7012. (b) Li, X.-Y.; Czernuszewics, R.
S.; R. S.; Kincaid, J. R.; Su, Y. O.; Spiro, T. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1990,
94, 31. (c) Li, X.-Y.; Czernuszewics, R. S.; Kincaid, J. R.; Stein, P.;
Spiro, T. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 47. (d) Kitagawa, T.; Abe; M.;
Ogoshi, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69, 4516. (e) Abe, M.; Kitagawa,
T.; Kyogoku, Y. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 69, 4526.
(12) Parkin, S. R.; Moezzi, B.; Hope, H. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1995, 28,
(19) Brennan, T. D.; Scheidt, W. R.; Shelnutt, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 3919.
53.