6630
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6630-6639
Physical Organic Chemistry of Transition Metal Carbene Complexes.
16.1 Reactions of (CO)5MdC(OR)Ph (M ) Cr or W; R ) Me or Et)
with Thiolate Ions in Aqueous Acetonitrile. Complete Kinetic
Dissection of the Two-Step Mechanism
Claude F. Bernasconi,* Kevin W. Kittredge, and Francis X. Flores
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UniVersity of California,
Santa Cruz, California 95064
ReceiVed March 15, 1999
Abstract: A kinetic study of the reactions of (CO)5MdC(OR′)Ph (1a, M ) Cr, R′ ) Me; 1b, M ) W, R′ )
Me; 1c, M ) Cr, R′ ) Et; 1d, M ) W, R′ ) Et) with n-PrS-, HOCH2CH2S-, MeO2CCH2CH2S-, and
MeO2CCH2S- in 50% MeCN-50% water (v/v) at 25 °C is reported. At low [RS-] and relatively low pH the
reaction leads to the nucleophilic substitution products (CO)5MdC(SR)Ph without accumulation of any
intermediate. At high [RS-] and high pH formation of a tetrahedral intermediate, (CO)5Mh C(OR′)(SR)Ph, is
observed. Upon addition of acid the intermediate is converted into the substitution product. For the reactions
of most thiolate ions a detailed kinetic analysis allowed the determination of the rate constants for nucleophilic
attack on the carbene complexes (k1) and its reverse (k-1), the equilibrium constant for nucleophilic addition
(K1 ) k1/k-1), and the rate constants for alkoxide ion departure from the respective intermediates catalyzed by
H+ (kH2 ) and N-methylmorpholinium ion (kB2 H). The dependence of these rate and equilibrium constants on the
metal, the leaving group, and the thiolate ion and comparisons with reactions of thiolate ions with other
electrophiles provide insights into the transition state structure, the resonance effect of the (CO)5M moieties,
the requirements for partial desolvation of the nucleophile prior to entering the transition state, and transition
state imbalances.
Introduction
A major difference between the Fischer carbene complexes
and the carboxylic esters is the much higher reactivity of the
former. The enhanced reactivity can be mainly attributed to
much stronger stabilization of the negative charge in 2 by the
(CO)5M moiety compared to the stabilization of the charge by
oxygen in the corresponding ester tetrahedral intermediate. An
approximate measure of this increased stabilization can be
derived from a comparison of the pKa value of 4a (12.5)9 with
In the presence of bases or nucleophiles, transition metal
carbene complexes of the Fischer type display reactivity patterns
that are similar to those of the isolobal carboxylic esters.2,3
A
prominent example is the substitution of an alkoxy group by
nucleophiles. This process is commonly assumed to involve the
two-step mechanism shown in eq 1. Such reactions have been
that of ethyl acetate (26.5).10 Recently it was shown that in the
reaction of 1a and 1b with MeO- in methanol this enhanced
documented with OH-,4 water,4b amines,2,5 thiolate ions,2,6
carbanions,2,7 and other nucleophiles.2,8
(6) (a) Fischer, E. O.; Leupold, M.; Kreiter, C. G.; Mu¨ller, J. Chem.
Ber. 1972, 105, 150. (b) Lam, C. T.; Senoff, C. V.; Ward, J. E. H. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1974, 70, 273. (c) Aumann, R.; Schro¨der, J. Chem. Ber.
1990, 123, 2053.
(7) (a) Fischer, E. O.; Riedmu¨ller, S. Chem. Ber. 1976, 109, 3358. (b)
Fischer, E. O.; Held, W.; Kreissl, F. R. Chem. Ber. 1977, 110, 3842. (c)
Burkhardt, T. J.; Casey, C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 5833. (d) Fischer,
E. O.; Held, F. R.; Kreissl, F. R.; Frank, A.; Hattner, G. Chem. Ber. 1977,
110, 656. (e) Casey, C. P.; Burkhardt, T. J.; Bunnell, C. A.; Calabrese, J.
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 2127.
(1) Part 15: Bernasconi, C. F.; Ali, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121,
3039.
(2) Do¨tz, K. H.; Fischer, H.; Hofmann, P.; Kreissl, F. R.; Schubert, U.;
Weiss, K. Transition Metal Complexes; Verlag Chemie: Deerfield Beach,
FL, 1983.
(3) Bernasconi, C. F. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1997, 26, 299.
(4) (a) Aumann, R.; Hinterding, P.; Kru¨ger, C.; Goddard, R. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1993, 459, 145. (b) Bernasconi, C. F.; Flores, F. X.;
Kittredge, K. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2103.
(5) (a) Klabunde, U.; Fischer, E. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 7141.
(b) Connor, J. A.; Fischer, E. O. J. Chem. Soc. A 1969, 578. (c) Fischer, E.
O.; Kollmeier, H.-J. Chem. Ber. 1971, 104, 1339. (d) Fischer, E. O.;
Leupold, M. Chem. Ber. 1972, 102, 599. (e) Fischer, E. O.; Heckl, B.;
Werner, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 28, 359. (f) Werner, H.; Fischer,
E. O.; Heckl, B.; Kreiter, C. G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 28, 367. (g)
Bernasconi, C. F.; Stronach, M. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1341.
(8) (a) Fischer, E. O.; Kreis, G.; Kreissl, F. R.; Kreiter, C. G.; Mu¨ller, J.
Chem. Ber. 1973, 106, 3910. (b) Casey, C. P.; Brunsvold, W. P. Inorg.
Chem. 1977, 16, 391. (c) Bell, R. A.; Chisholm, M. H.; Couch, D. A.;
Rankel, L. A. Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 677.
(9) (a) Gandler, J. R.; Bernasconi, C. F. Organometallics 1989, 8, 2282.
(b) Bernasconi, C. F.; Sun, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12526.
(10) Amyes, T. L.; Richard, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3129.
10.1021/ja9908265 CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 07/03/1999