4798 Organometallics, Vol. 20, No. 23, 2001
Yoshida et al.
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a J EOL270 spectrometer
in CDCl3 with tetramethylsilane as the internal standard at
ambient probe temperature (25 °C). Chemical shifts were
reported in δ units.
FD-MS spectra were recorded on an SX-102A from J apan
Electron Optics Laboratory Co., Ltd.
as eluent to afford a flesh-colored solid. Recrystallization from
n-hexane gave 1 as a flesh-colored powder in 65% yield (5.98
1
g, 35.2 mmol). H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 6.30 (dd, J ) 2
Hz, 1H, pyrrole ring aromatic H), 6.69 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, pyrrole
ring aromatic H), 6.89 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, pyrrole ring aromatic
H), 7.1-7.5 (m, 5H, benzene ring aromatic H), 8.29 (s, 1H,
-CHdN-), 9.85 (br s, 1H, pyrrole ring NH). FD-mass: m/z
170. Anal. Calcd for C11H10N2: C, 77.62; H, 5.92; N, 16.46.
Found: C, 77.73; H, 5.84; N, 16.33.
Elemental analysis for CHN was performed by a CHNO type
from Helaus Co.
All calculations were performed using the gradient-corrected
density functional method BLYP, by means of the Amsterdam
Density Functional (ADF ver2.3.0) program.30 For geometry
optimizations, we used a triple-ú basis set on Ti and a double-ú
STO basis set on N, Cl, and atoms constituting the ethylene
and methyl group as a polymer model. A single-ú STO basis
set was employed on the other atoms. For energy calculations,
a triple-ú STO basis set on Ti and a double-ú plus polarization
STO basis set on the other atoms are used and the quasi-
relativistic correction is also added.
[2-(P h NCH)C4H3N]2TiCl2 (1). To a stirred solution of 1a
(1.035 g, 6.08 mmol) in dried diethyl ether (15.5 mL) at -78
°C was added dropwise a 1.54 M n-butyllithium hexane
solution (4.15 mL, 6.38 mmol) over a 5 min period. The mixture
was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. The
resulting mixture was added dropwise over a 30 min period
to a 0.5 M n-heptane solution of TiCl4 (6.08 mL, 3.04 mmol)
in dried diethyl ether (15.5 mL) at -78 °C with stirring. The
mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 12
h. Then, the reaction mixture was filtered through a glass
filter, and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo to give a solid.
Dried diethyl ether (20 mL) was added to the solid, and the
mixture was stirred for 10 min and filtered. The filtrate was
concentrated in vacuo to yield a black solid. CH2Cl2 (5 mL)
and n-hexane (10 mL) were added to the solid, and the mixture
was stirred for 1 h and then filtered. Evaporation of the solvent
gave 1 (1.10 g, 2.40 mmol) as a black solid in 79% yield. 1H
NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 6.0-7.9 (m, 6H, pyrrole ring
aromatic H + 10H, benzene ring aromatic H), 7.80 (s, 2H,
-CHdN-). FD-mass: m/z 456 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C22H18N4-
TiCl2: C, 57.80; H, 3.97; N, 12.25. Found: C, 58.29; H, 3.95;
N, 12.62.
Single crystals of complex 1, 2, and 4 suitable for X-ray
analysis were grown from hexane/CH2Cl2 solutions. Details of
the crystal data are listed in Table 1.
Data collection for complex 1 was performed on a Rigaku
AFC7R diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo KR
radiation at 296 K. The data were corrected for Lorentz and
polarization effects, but no decay collection was applied. The
structure was solved by direct methods (SIR92)31 and expanded
using Fourier techniques (DIRDIF94).32 The non-hydrogen
atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were
refined isotropically.
Data collections for complex 2 and 4 performed made on a
Rigaku RAXIS-IV imaging plate diffractometer with graphite-
monochromated Mo KR radiation at 150 K. The data were
corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects, but no decay
collection was applied. The structure was solved by heavy-atom
Patterson methods (PATTY)33 and expanded using Fourier
techniques (DIRDIF94).32 The non-hydrogen atoms were re-
fined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were included but not
refined.
All calculations were performed using the teXsan crystal-
lographic software package34 of Molecular Structure Corp.
Intrinsic viscosity [η] was measured in decalin at 135 °C
using an Ubbelohde viscometer (polyethylene 25 mg/decalin
25 mL). Viscosity average molecular weight (Mv) values of
polyethylenes were calculated from the equation [η] ) (6.2 ×
10-4)Mv0.7. The molecular weight distribution (Mw/ Mn) value
of polyethylene was determined using a Waters 150-C gel
permeation chromatograph at 145 °C using polyethylene cali-
bration and equipped with three TSKgel columns (two sets of
TSKgelGMHHR-H(S)HT and TSKgelGMH6-HTL). o-Dichloro-
benzene was employed as a solvent at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/
min.
Com plex Syn th esis. 2-(P h NCH)C4H3NH (1a). To a stirred
solution of pyrrole-2-carboxyaldehyde (5.07 g, 53.3 mmol) in
dried ethanol (150 mL), aniline (4.96 g, 53.3 mmol) and formic
acid (1 mL), as a catalyst, were added. The reaction mixture
was stirred for 72 h at room temperature. Evaporation of the
ethanol gave a solid residue, which was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel using hexane/ethyl acetate (9/1)
2-(EtNCH)C4H3NH (2a ). 2a was prepared using a proce-
dure similar to that for 1a . 1H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3, δ): 1.26
(t, J ) 7 Hz, 3H, CH3-), 3.56 (q, J ) 7 Hz, 2H, -CH2-), 6.26
(dd, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, aromatic H), 6.43 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, aromatic
H), 6.89 (d, J ) 2 Hz 1H, aromatic H), 8.13 (s, 1H, -CHdN-
), 9.20 (br s, 1H, pyrrole ring NH). FD-mass: m/z 122. Anal.
Calcd for C7H10N2: C, 68.82; H, 8.25; N, 22.93. Found: C,
68.39; H, 8.30; N, 23.12.
[2-(EtNCH)C4H3N]2TiCl2 (2). 2 was prepared using a
procedure similar to that for 1. 1H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3, δ):
1.05 (t, J ) 7 Hz, 6H, CH3-), 3.09 (q, J ) 7 Hz, 4H, -CH2-),
6.30 (dd, J ) 2 Hz, 2H, aromatic H), 6.58 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 2H,
aromatic H), 7.80 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 2H, aromatic H), 8.00 (s, 2H,
-CHdN-). FD-mass: m/z 360 (M+). Anal. Calcd for C14H18N4-
TiCl2: C, 46.57; H, 5.02; N, 15.52. Found: C, 47.01; H, 4.97;
N, 15.94.
2-(n -h exyl-NCH)C4H3NH (3a ). 3a was prepared using a
1
procedure similar to that for 1a . H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3,
δ): 0.90 (d, J ) 7 Hz, 3H, CH3-), 1.30 (m, 6H, n-hexyl H),
1.65 (dd, J ) 7 Hz, 2H, n-hexyl H), 3.52 (t, 2H, J ) 7 Hz,
n-hexyl H), 6.24 (dd, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, aromatic H), 6.45 (d, J )
2 Hz, 1H, aromatic H), 6.88 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, aromatic H),
8.08 (s, 1H, -CHdN-), 9.48 (br s, 1H, pyrrole ring NH). FD-
mass: m/z 178. Anal. Calcd for C11H18N2: C, 74.11; H, 10.18;
N, 15.71. Found: C, 73.95; H, 10.93; N, 15.99.
[2-(n -h exyl-NCH)C4H3N]2TiCl2 (3). 3 was prepared by the
procedure outlined for 1. The yield was 37%. 1H NMR (270
MHz, CDCl3, δ): 0.8-1.6 (m, 22H, n-hexyl H), 2.7-3.3 (m, 4H,
n-hexyl H), 6.30 (dd, J ) 2 Hz, 2H, aromatic H), 6.58 (d, J )
2 Hz, 2H, aromatic H), 7.80 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 2H, aromatic H),
7.88 (s, 2H, -CHdN-). FD-mass: m/z 472 (M+). Anal. Calcd
for C22H34N4TiCl2: C, 55.83; H, 7.24; N, 11.84. Found: C,
55.49; H, 7.04; N, 12.23.
(30) Guerra, C. F.; Snijders, J . G.; te Velde, G.; Baerends, E. J . Theor.
Chem. Acta 1998, 99, 391.
(31) SIR92: Altomare, A.; Cascarano, M.; Giacovazzo, C.; Guagliardi,
A. J . Appl. Crystallogr. 1994, 26, 343.
(32) DIRDIF94: Beurskens, P. T.; Admiraal, G.; Beurskens, G.;
Bosman, W. P.; de Gelder, R.; Israel, R.; Smits, J . M. M. In The
DIRDIF-94 Program System; Technical Report of the Crystallography
Laboratory; University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1994.
(33) PATTY: Beurskens, P. T.; Admiraal, G.; Beurskens, G.; Bos-
man, W. P.; de Gelder, R.; Israel, R.; Smits, J . M. M. In The DIRDIF-
94 Program System; Technical Report of the Crystallography Labo-
ratory; University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 1994.
(34) teXsan: Crystal Structure Analysis Package; Molecular Struc-
ture Corpo., The Woodlands, TX, 1985 and 1999.
2-(cycloh exyl-NCH)C4H3NH (4a ). 4a was prepared using
a procedure similar to that for 1a . 1H NMR (270 MHz, CDCl3,
δ): 1.1-1.9 (m, 10H, cyclohexyl H), 3.0-3.2 (m, 1H, cyclohexyl
H), 6.21 (dd, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, aromatic H), 6.48 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H,
aromatic H), 6.89 (d, J ) 2 Hz, 1H, aromatic H), 8.13 (s, 1H,
-CHdN-), 8.35 (br s, 1H, pyrrole ring NH). FD-mass: m/z: