Scheme 1. Enantioselective Synthesis of Bicyclic â-Lactones
via the Nucleophile-Catalyzed Aldol Lactonization (NCAL)
Process
Table 1. Stereochemical Invertive Ring Cleavage of [3.2.0]
Bicylic â-Lactone (+)-1 with Various Alkyl Cuprates
cyclohexyl carboxylic acids, useful building blocks for
natural and unnatural product synthesis. Pioneering studies
of this process by Fujisawa, Normant, and subsequently
Vederas focused primarily on cuprate additions to monocy-
clic â-lactones.6 In these and more recent studies,7 aryl
cuprate addition was often compromised by lower conversion
and 1,2-addition.8 Herein, we report the reactivity of both
alkyl and aryl cuprates with bicyclic â-lactones and the
important impact of MgBr2 concentration on the efficiency
of addition, an observation previously noted by Vederas6g
but apparently overlooked in more recent studies.9
a Conditions: RMgBr (6.0 equiv), CuBr‚DMS (3.0 equiv), TMSCl (1.5
equiv), THF, -42 to -5 °C, 2 h. b i-PrMgCl was employed instead of
i-PrMgBr. c The reaction was warmed to 10 °C over 4 h. d Yields refer to
isolated (silica gel), purified product. e dr >19:1, minor diastereomers could
1
not be detected in crude reaction mixtures (500 MHz H NMR).
We intiated our studies with bicyclic â-lactone (+)-11f and
screened a variety of alkyl cuprates under standard condi-
tions.10 Starting with methyl cuprate, it was determined that
3.0 equiv of cuprate were necessary for optimal conversion.
Use of only 1.5 equiv led to incomplete reaction even upon
warming to ambient temperature (Table 1, entry 1). Interest-
ingly, reaction with i-PrMgCl-derived cuprate was complete
within 30 min at -42 °C (Table 1, entry 2). When the bulky
t-BuMgBr-derivedcupratewasemployed, onlymodestconver-
sion (25%) was observed even when the reaction was warmed
to ambient temperature (Table 1, entry 3). While use of
BnMgBr-derived cuprate required warming to 10 °C for com-
plete consumption of starting material, this cuprate gave the
most efficient conversion to alkylated product (Table 1, entry
4).
Two results mirror those previously observed during
studies of additions to monocyclic â-lactones (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Divergent Reactivity with Vinyl and Allyl
Cuprates
(3) (a) Cortez, G. S.; Tennyson, R. L.; Romo, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 7945. (b) Cortez, G. S.; Oh, S. H.; Romo, D. Synthesis 2001,
1731. (c) See also ref 1f.
(4) Riyad, H.; Lee, C. S.; Purohit, V.; Romo, D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4363.
(5) For additions of heteroatom nucleophiles to bicyclic â-lactones, see:
(a) Yokota, Y.; Cortez, G. S.; Romo, D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7075. For
other examples of additions to monocyclic-â-lactones, see: (b) ref 2. (c)
Nelson, S. G.; Spencer, K. L; Cheung, W. S.; Mamie, S. J. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 7081.
First, the allylmagnesium chloride-derived cuprate led to
exclusive double 1,2-addition providing keto diol (+)-3.7a,11
Second, use of vinyl cuprate gave a tandem 1,2/1,4 addition
leading to ketone (-)-4 in high yield.7b
(6) (a) Normant, J. F.; Alexakis, A.; Cahiez, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980,
21, 935. (b) Sato, T.; Kawara, T.; Kawashima, M.; Fujisawa, T. Chem.
Lett. 1980, 571. (c) Sato, T.; Kawara, T.; Nishizawa, A.; Fujisawa, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3377. (d) Fujisawa, T.; Sato, T.; Kawara, T.;
Ohashi, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 4823. (e) Sato, T.; Naruse, K.;
Fujisawa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3587. (f) Sato, T.; Itoh, T.; Hatori,
C.; Fujisawa, T. Chem. Lett. 1983, 1391. (g) Arnold, L. D.; Kalantar, T.
H.; Vederas, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 7105. (h) Arnold, L. D.;
Kalantar, T. H.; Vederas, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 4649. (i)
Kawashima, M.; Sato, T.; Fujisawa, T. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 403.
(7) (a) Nelson, S. G.; Wan, Z.; Stan, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4680.
(b) Smith, N. D.; Wohlrab, A. M.; Goodman, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 255.
(8) The report from the Goodman group (ref 7b) made extensive use of
chloro Grignard-derived cuprates but no rationalization was provided.
(9) For recent reports of invertive cleavage of â-lactones with various
nucleophiles, see: (a) Castagnani, R.; De Angelis, F.; De Fusco, E.;
Giannessi, F.; Misiti, D.; Meloni, D.; Tinti, M. O. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
8318. (b) Bernabei, I.; Castagnani, R.; De angelis, F.; De Fusco, E.;
Giannessi, F.; Misiti, D.; Muck, S.; Scafetta, N.; Tinti, M. O. Chem. Eur.
J. 1996, 2, 826. (c) Nelson, S. G.; Spencer, K. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2000, 39, 1323. (d) Reference 5.
We then studied aryl cuprates beginning with phenyl
cuprate and again found that stoichiometry was crucial for
optimal conversion. However, application of the optimized
conditions developed for alkyl cuprate additions gave only
poor yields of the phenyl adduct 5a, which was isolated as
ester (+)-6a following esterification with diazomethane
(Table 2). After careful separation and analysis, a major
byproduct was identified as the somewhat unstable â-bromo
acid 7, which was more readily isolated after esterification
to provide methyl ester (+)-8.12 Unreacted starting material
could also be recovered; however, 1,2-addition was not
observed. By increasing the amount of cuprate to 5.0 equiv,
conversion was improved and ester (+)-6a was isolated in
(10) Nelson previously employed similar conditions for additions to
monocyclic-â-lactones, see ref 7a.
(11) In this instance, the dioxolane was prone to hydrolysis during
reaction workup.
2112
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 11, 2007