J. Biała et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 13 (2002) 1021–1023
1023
Table 1. Diastereoselectivity of lortalamine analogs
129.29, 129.18, 128.58, 128.46, 127.36, 127.23, 124.98,
122.03, 121.87, 120.63, 117.52, 117.28, 83.34, 64.00, 63.77,
62.21, 61.36, 61.32, 53.57, 53.54, 51.10, 51.01, 50.50,
48.51, 47.43, 46.21, 37.28, 36.92, 35.61, 35.43, 18.69,
13.79; EI 70 eV m/z (%): 420 (65), 405 (80), 374 (20), 347
(45), 315 (35), 289 (25), 200 (50), 184 (25), 105 (100).
7. X-Ray intensity data for 10 and 15a: Measurements were
completed at T=293 K on a Kuma KM4CCD k-axis
formation13
Entry
Diastereomers
Yield (%)
Selectivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
14aa:14ba
15a:15b
16a:16b
17a:17b
18a:18b
19a:19b
89
91
78
92
95
77
48:52
62:38
40:60
29:71
23:77
84:16
,
diffractometer with Mo Ka radiation (u=0.71073 A).
2120 frames were collected at 0.9° intervals with a count-
ing time of 5 s for 15a (656 frames and 0.7° for 10,
respectively). The data were corrected for Lorentz and
polarization effects. No absorption corrections were
applied. The structures were solved by direct methods
from SHELXS11 and refined using SHELXL software.12
Crystal data for compound 10: C25H24Cl2N2O4, M=
487.36, monoclinic space group P21; a=12.910(3), b=
a a, less polar; b, more polar diastereomer on silica plate.
14a, the chiral auxiliary was subsequently removed by
hydrogenolysis over Pd/C and the secondary amine
thus formed was subsequently N-methylated using
formaldehyde–sodium borohydride to afford (+)-2 in
enantiomerically pure form.
,
14.020(3), c=12.920(3) A, i=91.00(3)°, V=2338.1(8)
,
3
A , Z=4 and Dcalcd=1.384 Mg/m3. Colorless crystal, v
(Mo Ka)=0.313 mm−1, F(000)=1016, 4727 reflections
collected. Least squares on F2 (all reflections), R=0.0633,
wR2=0.1795 (observed).
We observed that whereas the modification of the cou-
marin component affected the diastereomeric ratio
slightly (Table 1, entries 1–3), a more profound influ-
ence on the stereoselectivity could be noticed when a
more sterically demanding amine was applied as the
chiral auxiliary. Thus, when ketone 7 derived from
(R)-(+)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethylamine5 was used, we
observed an increase of the selectivity to around 23:77
or even 84:16 (Table 1, entries 4–6).
8. Selected data for 14a: [h]2D0=+31.6 (c 2.05, CHCl3); mp
156–157°C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): l 7.30–6.78
(9H, m), 6.51 (1H, s), 3.41 (2H, ABq, J=13.5), 2.90 (2H,
br d, J=5.5 Hz), 2.79–2.70 (2H, m), 2.60 and 2.56 (1H,
two s), 2.36–2.32 (2H, m), 1.98–1.95 (1H, m), 1.92–1.86
(2H, m), 1.80 (1H, br s), 1.28 (3H, d, J=6.0 Hz); 13C
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 171.22, 149.87, 144.58, 129.14,
128.63, 128.33, 127.31, 126.92, 123.28, 121.72, 117.32,
81.45, 64.06, 48.73, 47.46, 42.26, 38.04, 36.53, 32.83,
19.00; EI 70 eV 8 kV m/z (%): 348 (75), 333 (100), 243
(50), 271 (8), 200 (18), 105 (62), 91 (10), 77 (12); IR (KBr,
cm−1) 3450, 3200, 2800, 1680, 1580.
The preliminary results described above show that pop-
ular chiral, non-racemic 1-arylethyl amines may also
serve as good chiral inductors in the diastereoselective
synthesis of benzopyranopyridine derivatives.
9. Selected data for 14b: [h]2D3=−27 (c 2.0, CHCl3); mp
218–220°C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz): l 7.29–6.78
(9H, m), 6.56 (1H, s), 3.44 (2H, ABq, J=5.5), 2.76–2.70
(2H, m), 2.60–2.51 (2H, m), 2.39–2.24 (2H, m), 2.11 (1H,
d, J=13.5 Hz), 2.00 (1H, br s), 1.80–1.75 (1H, t, J=11.5
Hz), 1.33 (3H, d, =5.5 Hz); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3): 171.18, 149.82, 129.15, 128.59, 128.40, 127.29,
126.97, 123.24, 121.70, 117.29, 81.37, 64.45, 51.14, 45.35,
42.20, 37.90, 36.53, 32.58, 20.01; EI 70 eV 8 kV m/z (%):
348 (85), 333 (100), 243 (60), 271 (10), 200 (25), 105 (65),
91 (10); IR (KBr, cm−1) 3400, 3200, 3000–2700, 1510.
10. Crystal data for compound 15a: C23H26N2O3, M=378.46,
References
1. Bruno, O.; Schenone, S.; Ranise, A.; Barocelli, E.; Chi-
avarini, M.; Ballabeni, V.; Bertoni, S. Arzneimittel-
Forsch. 2000, 50, 140–147.
2. Hadfield, J. A.; Pavlidis, V. H.; Perry, P. J.; McGown, A.
T. Anti-Cancer Drug 1999, 10, 591–595.
3. Sanger, D. J.; Depoortere, R.; Perrault, G. Behav. Phar-
macol. 1996, 7, 477–482.
4. Briet, P.; Berthelon J. J.; Depin J. C. US Patent
4,201,783, 1980.
monoclinic space group C2, a=31.122(6), b=9.761(2),
5. Kuehne, M. E.; Matson, P. A.; Bornmann, W. G. J. Org.
Chem. 1991, 56, 513–528.
3
,
,
c=7.8290(16) A, i=97.19(3)°, V=2359.6(8) A , Z=4
and Dcalcd=1.065 Mg/m3. Clear colorless crystal, v (Mo
Ka)=0.071 mm−1, F(000)=808, 21246 reflections col-
lected, 5754 [R(int)=0.0310], 5072 observed [I>2|(I)].
Least squares on F2 (all reflections), R=0.0584, wR2=
0.1556 (observed).
6. Typical preparation of b-keto ester 8: A mixture of N-
[(S)-a-methylbenzyl]-4-piperidone 6 (0.70 g, 3.4 mmol),
ethyl coumarin-3-carboxylate 3 (0.75 g, 3.4 mmol) and
ammonium acetate (1.32 g, 17.2 mmol) in anhydrous
ethanol (7 ml) was stirred for 90 h at room temperature.
Alcohol was removed under reduced pressure and after
addition of water (20 ml), the mixture was extracted with
chloroform. Column chromatography on 230/400 mesh
silica gel (chloroform/methanol 99:1) and recrystalliza-
tion (ethanol/ether) gave 8 as white crystals (89% yield).
[h]D20=−10.5 (c 1.4, CHCl3); mp 172–178°C; 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3, most of the signals are doubled): l
168.48, 168.43, 167.26, 150.64, 129.80, 129.76, 129.54,
11. Sheldrick, G. M. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, A46, 467–473.
12. Sheldrick G. M. SHELXL-97. Program for the Refine-
ment of Crystal Structures. University of Go¨ttingen, Ger-
many.
13. HPLC analyses were performed on a Knauer (model 64)
apparatus, using 4×250 mm (5 mm) Li-Chrosorb Si-60
silica column with gradient ratio of dichloromethane/
methanol.