7878
R. W. Kinas et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 7875–7879
Table 1. Reactions of alkali metal salts of diethyl phosphite 1 with diethyl phosphorochloridate 2
Entry
Counter-ion of 1
Solvent and molar concentration of 1
Additives or reaction conditions
Yield of 3a (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Na+ (c)
Na+ (c)
Na+ (c)
Na+ (c)
Li+ (d)
Na+ (c)
K+ (e)
Toluene, 1.2
Toluene, 1.2
Toluene, 1.2
Toluene, 1.2
THF, 2.4
THF, 2.4
THF, 2.4
Acetonitrile, 1.2
None
74
44
28
73
0
2
17
29
Galvinoxylb
PDBb
Reaction in the dark
None
None
None
None
Na+ (f)
a Yields were determined by integration of 31P NMR spectra and calculated as a percentage of conversion of 2 to 3.
b 0.132 molar equiv. of galvinoxyl or PDB was added into suspension of 1.
Elemental sodium(c), butyllithium(d), potassium tert-butoxide(e) and sodium hydride(f) were used for diethyl phosphite salt generation prior to its
reaction with 2.
the reaction of sodium diethyl phosphite 1 with diethyl
phosphorochloridate 2 could be an example of a single
electron transfer process. The electron transfer nature
of this reaction should then be a function of the oxy-
genation potential of diethyl phosphite salt and the
solvent. Indeed, while sodium and potassium phos-
phites 1 gave observable yields of tetraethyl hypophos-
phate 3 when the reaction was performed in THF
solution (Table 1, entries 6 and 7), under identical
(Scheme 2, path a) to form the final product—tetra-
ethyl hypophosphate 3.
Acknowledgements
Studies described in this report were financially assisted
by the State Committee for Scientific Research (KBN).
experimental conditions formation of
3 was not
observed with lithium salt (entry 5), otherwise known
to undergo electrochemical oxidation at higher anodic
potential than sodium salt.17 No influence on the yield
of hypophosphate formation was observed when reac-
tion was carried out in the dark in toluene solution
(entry 4).
References
1. Michalski, J.; Zwierzak, A. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Ser.
Sci. Chim. 1965, 13, 253.
2. Stec, W. J.; Zwierzak, A. Can. J. Chem. 1967, 45, 2513.
3. Stec, W. J.; Zwierzak, A.; Michalski, J. Bull. Acad. Polon.
Sci., Ser. Sci. Chim. 1970, 18, 23.
Higher yields of the hypophosphate 3 were obtained in
aprotic nonpolar solvents (benzene, toluene) than in
aprotic polar ones (acetonitrile, THF). The absence of
doubly labeled 18O-hypophosphate 3 in experiments
with oxygen labeled 1, its nearly the same isotope
enrichment as that of the substrate 1, as well as the lack
of photostimulation and lowering of the yield of the
hypophosphate 3 in the presence of free radical scav-
engers suggest, that non-chain process occurs inside the
solvent cage, and no radical intermediates are left free
in solution. On the basis of product analysis, 18O
isotope scrambling, and the results of trapping experi-
ments, one can postulate that two parallel processes
occur in the reaction of diethyl phosphorochloridate 2
with sodium diethyl phosphite 1. One is ionic nucle-
ophilic substitution with diethyl phosphite anion acting
as a nucleophile, which leads to the formation of
diethyl phosphorochloridite 9 and diethyl phosphate 7
as primary products, and formation, in subsequent
reactions, anhydrides 4, 5 and 6. Another one is a single
electron transfer pathway, which may be induced by
ion-complexing properties of tetraethyl pyrophosphite 4
formed in the aforementioned ionic reaction. The SET
pathway, with diethyl phosphorochloridate 2 and
diethyl phosphite anion 1 acting as electron acceptor
and electron donor, respectively, involves the formation
of radical–radical ion EDA-type complex 10/11, which
undergoes recombination within the solvent cage
4. Stec, W. J.; Zwierzak, A.; Michalski, J. Bull. Acad. Polon.
Sci., Ser. Sci. Chim. 1969, 17, 587.
5. Diethyl phosphorochloridate was added portionwise, at
the temperature ranging from −50 to −60°C, into the
stirred suspension of sodium diethyl phosphite prepared
by reaction of equimolar amount of elemental sodium
with a toluene solution of diethyl phosphite (1.2 M, 25
mL). Samples (0.4 mL) were collected after partial addi-
tion of 2, allowed to warm up to room temperature,
diluted with C6D6 and analyzed by 31P NMR (Bruker AC
200). Products of the reaction were identified by their
chemical shifts, coupling constants, and comparison with
genuine samples obtained on independent ways.
6. Suzuki, N.; Kawai, T.; Inoue, S.; Sano, N.; Izawa, Y.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 53, 1421.
7. Romakhin, A. S.; Zagumennov, V. A.; Nikitin, E. V.
Rus. J. Gen. Chem. 1997, 67, 1022.
8. Levin, Y. A.; Il’yasov, A. V.; Goldfarb, E. I.; Vorkunova,
E. I. Org. Magn. Res. 1973, 5, 487.
9. (a) Russell, G. A.; Hershberger, J. Chem. Commun. 1980,
216; (b) Russell, G. A.; Danen, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1968, 90, 5663; (c) Russell, G. A.; Danen, W. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 374; (d) Russel, G. A.; Pecararo, J.
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3331; (e) Russell, G. A.;
Ros, F.; Hershberger, J.; Tashtoush, H. J. Org. Chem.
1982, 47, 1480.
10. (a) Bunnett, J. F.; Creary, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39,
3612; (b) Hoz, S.; Bunnett, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977,