276
E. Martin et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 363 (2010) 275–278
2.3. Crystallographic analysis
Colourless blocks of [Li(OEt2)4][B(C6F5)4] (1a) suitable for X-ray
diffraction were obtained by cooling the solution obtained in 2.2.
to À28 °C overnight.
2.3.1. Crystal data
ꢀ
C16H40O4Li, C24F20B, M = 982.5. Triclinic, space group P1 (no. 2),
Scheme 1. Preparation of 1.
a = 11.1432(2), b = 11.1625(2), c = 17.8069(4) Å,
86.058(2),
= 89.857(2)°, V = 2166.97(7) Å3. Z = 2, Dc = 1.506 g
cmÀ3, F(000) = 1000, T = 140(1) K, ) = 1.53 cmÀ1, k(Mo
(Mo K
) = 0.71073 Å.
Crystals of [Li(OEt2)4][B(C6F5)4] (1a) were examined under per-
a = 78.734(2), b =
c
l
a
diethyl ether and light petroleum [12]. When a B(C6F5)3 solution
in diethyl ether was added at À78 °C to a solution of C6F5Li in a
1:1 mixture of diethyl ether and light petroleum and the reaction
mixture allowed to warm up slowly to room temperature, a micro-
crystalline solid precipitated, which after drying corresponds to a
75% yield of [Li(OEt2)3][B(C6F5)4]. The 19F NMR of the precipitate
indicated very high (>98%) anion purity. Apparently any impurities
and by-products remain in solution under these conditions
(Scheme 1).
Ka
fluoropolyether oil, one, ca 0.56 Â 0.44 Â 0.21 mm, was mounted
on a glass fibre and fixed in the cold nitrogen stream on an Oxford
Diffraction Xcalibur-3 CCD diffractometer equipped with Mo K
radiation and graphite monochromator. Intensity data were mea-
sured by thin-slice - and u-scans. Total no. of reflections re-
corded, to hmax = 25.0°, was 39729 of which 7618 were unique
(Rint = 0.038); 5670 were ‘observed’ with I > 2 (I).
a
x
r
The number of associated diethyl ether molecules was deter-
Data were processed using the CRYSALIS-CCD and -RED [6] programs.
The structure was determined by the direct methods routines in
the SHELXS program [7a] and refined by full-matrix least-squares
methods, on F2’s, in SHELXL [7b]. The non-hydrogen atoms were re-
fined with anisotropic thermal parameters. Hydrogen atoms were
included in idealised positions and their Uiso values were set to ride
on the Ueq values of the parent carbon atoms. At the conclusion of
the refinement, wR2 = 0.102 and R1 = 0.070 [7b] for all 7618 reflec-
mined by comparing results for integrating the 1H and 19F NMR
spectra of 1 using ca 0.02 mL
a,a,a-trifluoro-p-xylene (F3CC6-
H4CH3) as a reference (the spectra are given in the Supplementary
Information). The number of diethyl ether molecules coordinated
to the lithium cation (n) was found to be three, which is in good
agreement with the results of the elemental analysis.
tions weighted w = [r +
2(F2o) + (0.049P)2 + 0.667P]À1 with P = (Fo2
3.2. Molecular structure
2F2)/3; for the ‘observed’ data only, R1 = 0.041.
c
In the final difference map, the highest peak (ca 0.59 e ÅÀ3) was
close to C71.
In order to better understand the composition of 1, its solid
state structure was determined. To the best of our knowledge,
the solid state structure of a material with the formulation
[Li(Et2O)n][B(C6F5)4] has not been reported. There are six crystal
structures of lithium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate salts in
the Cambridge Structural Database, but none with diethyl ether
donors [13,14].
Crystallisation of 1, from a saturated diethyl ether solution at
À28 °C, yielded crystals which were very sensitive to solvent loss
and required storage under the mother liquor.
Scattering factors for neutral atoms were taken from reference
[8]. Computer programs used in this analysis have been noted
above, and were run through WINGX [9] on a Dell Precision 370 PC
at the University of East Anglia.
Selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table 1.
3. Results and discussion
The structure was determined to be [Li(OEt2)4][B(C6F5)4] (1a) in
which the asymmetric unit consists of an ion pair (Fig. 1). Both ions
have a tetrahedral distribution of ligands around the central
atoms; bond lengths and angles are reported in Table 1. There is
nothing exceptional about the molecular structures of the cation
and anion, which closely resemble those previously reported
[14,15] and there is no close contact between the lithium centre
and the anion.
Evidently, in diethyl ether solution, the lithium cation of lithium
tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate is fully solvated with four coor-
dinated molecules of diethyl ether. This salt can be crystallized
from diethyl ether solution. The facile loss of a solvent as volatile
as diethyl ether leading to crystal degeneration is a common phe-
nomenon but in this case it is not lattice solvent molecules but
those donors associated with the cation that are lost. In our hands
simple drying of the solid under vacuum at room temperature re-
sults in the loss of one molecule of diethyl ether per lithium centre
giving [Li(OEt2)3][B(C6F5)4]. Presumably continued vacuum-drying
perhaps at elevated temperatures might result in the slow loss of
further molecules of diethyl ether.
3.1. Synthesis
Since its discovery, and because of its importance, there have
been numerous revised syntheses of lithium tetrakis(pentafluor-
ophenyl)borate [10]. We required a convenient laboratory route
to a material with high anion purity and well defined stoichiome-
try. Song et al. reported that an ether-free salt could be obtained by
treating B(C6F5)3 with C6F5Li in light petroleum [11]. However, in
our hands this method yielded an off-white solid with several sets
of 19F resonances indicating poor purity. Marks has shown that re-
lated anions can be prepared cleanly using a solvent mixture of
Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) for [Li(OEt2)4][B(C6F5)4] (1a).
B–C11
B–C41
B–C31
B–C21
1.651(3)
1.653(3)
1.654(3)
1.658(3)
C11–B–C41
C11–B–C31
C41–B–C31
C11–B–C21
C41–B–C21
C31–B–C21
114.46(17)
101.85(16)
113.49(17)
113.17(17)
101.60(16)
112.77(17)
Close inspection of the supramolecular architecture of 1a
(Fig. 2) reveals a lattice structure consisting of layers of the anion
alternating with layers of the cation along the b-axis parallel to
the (1 0 1) plane. These oppositely charged layers are attracted
by coulombic interactions, there are no short charge-assisted C–
HÁÁÁF–C hydrogen bonds.
Li–O8
Li–O5
Li–O7
Li–O6
1.936(4)
1.942(4)
1.951(4)
1.957(4)
O8–Li–O5
O8–Li–O7
O5–Li–O7
O8–Li–O6
O5–Li–O6
O7–Li–O6
104.20(18)
109.49(18)
109.0(2)
110.3(2)
116.90(19)
106.80(19)