1466
P. P. M. A. Dols et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 1461–1467
Table 4.
R8
R7
O
N
H
H
N
CF3
R6
O
Compound
R6
R7
R8
PRB luciferase
EC50 (nM)
i.a.
IC50 (nM)
i.a.
9a
9g
9i
H
Cl
H
H
Cl
H
Cl
H
H
H
H
H
10.6
198
38
0.63
0.73
0.47
0.96
0.17
0.87
43
730
318
0.27
0.20
0.28
H
F
Cl
H
Cl
9j
Cl
H
1.6
9k
9l
H
Cl
993
19
2220
0.62
H
9m
9n
9o
9p
H
Vinyl
COMe
H
>1000
258
0.81
0.96
H
0.47
1.26
0.93
Vinyl
COMe
H
tion. The other enantiomer (1R,14bS) showed a more
than 15-fold reduction in potency (Table 2).
Investigation of substitution on the aromatic A ring
indicated that small polar and non-polar groups (e.g.,
chlorine (9l), vinyl (9o), acetyl (9p)) are permitted in
the 6 position (R6), resulting in potent agonists. 6,7-
Disubstitution resulted in the potent agonist 9j. For
the 7 position (R7) we clearly see that chlorine (9a) is still
the most active substituent, followed by fluorine (9g).
Substitution at this position by an acetyl (9n) or vinyl
(9m) moiety diminished the potency. Substitution of
the 8 position (R8) with chlorine (9k, 9i) is not favoured,
which might be an indication for restricted space at this
area of the receptor site.
To date, we have not been able to obtain an X-ray dif-
fraction structure of any of the ligands described above
bound to PR. In order to assess the positioning of the
tetracyclic scaffold in the progesterone receptor, a dock-
ing experiment was performed (see Supplementary
material). Compound 9a was selected as the model com-
pound. Figure 1 shows these minimal-energy poses for
the two orientations. When the two eutomers are com-
pared, orientation 2 (COCF3 group coinciding with
the C20 carbonyl) has a slightly lower interaction en-
ergy. This would seem to make orientation 2 more
likely. However, if we compare the resulting space occu-
pied within PR between the two orientations, we observe
that in orientation 1 (COCF3 group coinciding with the
C3 carbonyl), aromatic ring C occupies the space above
C10 and C11 in steroids. Indeed, active progestagens
with rather large 11b substituents are known.9 On the
contrary, in orientation 2, ring C occupies a space below
and beyond C7 and C8, and only slightly touches the
pocket frequently postulated10 below ring D of steroids.
Based on these data, an unequivocal choice between the
two orientations is hardly possible.
In conclusion, we have identified a novel series of po-
tent progesterone receptor agonists, the 2,3,4,14b-tet-
rahydro-1H-dibenzo[b,f]pyrido[1,2-d][1,4]oxazepines. SAR
studies demonstrated the importance of a 6- and/or
7-substituent for activity. Incorporation of a trifluoro-
acetamide or a trifluorothioamide substituent at the
N-1 position significantly improved the potency in this
series, producing the very potent agonists 9a, 9o, 9p
and 11. Probably these two functionalities, 6- or 7-
substituent and trifluoroacetamide or trifluorothioa-
mide, mimic the two carbonyl groups of progesterone.
Further developments of this series will be published
in due course.
Investigation of the bridgehead atom by compounds
9c–e demonstrated that C, S, O and N are all well tol-
erated but that CH2 and S are more potent than O
and NMe. Although X = O was not the most potent
option in the bridgehead position, the difference with
either methylene or sulfur is not substantial. There-
fore, we decided to keep oxygen as the most preferred
bridgehead, both for reasons of synthetic feasibility as
well as because of the fact it is expected to be less
prone to metabolic conversions or instability as is
known by potential oxidation of S and N and radical
formation of CH2.
Acknowledgments
The following co-workers are acknowledged for their
contribution to this project: Ingrid Zanders-van der
Ley, Arnold Broess, Ruud Tas, Robert Lazeroms, Co
Peters, Hemen Ibrahim, Rinie Bouwman, Abasin Mo-
mand, Lian de Bruin-Timmerman, Irene Korbl-Gol-
stein, Dirk de Weys, Jeffry Wisse, Marcel van der Rijst
and Marjo Schepers.