Bifunctional Catalysts Stabilized on Nanocrystalline Magnesium Oxide
FULL PAPERS
olefin, trans-stilbene, NMO and the mixture was stirred for
References
24 h. No stilbene diol was formed. Furthermore, no osmium
was detected in those filtrates by the SEM-EDX. These results
strongly suggest that the OsO4 is bound to the support during
the reaction when all the constituents are present. It appears
that during oxidation with NMO the anionic form of OsO4
transforms into an Os(VIII) species, but is bound on MgO
through some other electrostatic interaction that includes hy-
drogen bonding interaction with the Bronsted hydroxyl groups
of MgO. From the above results we have observed that no Os
was leached during the reaction.
Experiment 3: A mixture of Mg-OsO4 and NMO in H2O-
CH3CN-acetone was stirred for 24 h at room temperature
and filtered. To the filtrate was added a-methylstyrene and
the mixture was stirred for 8 h. The diol was formed in good
yields. The result clearly shows that the catalyst suffers from
leaching of osmium upon treatment with cooxidant in the ab-
sence of olefin.
Experiment 4: Mg-OsO4 was stirred with NMO for 24 h in t-
BuOH-H2O. trans-Stilbene was then added and the mixture
was stirred for 10 h. After completion of the reaction, the cat-
alyst was removed by filtration. Two separate experiments
were conducted both with the recovered catalyst and the fil-
trate as described. A mixture of the recoveredcatalyst, a-meth-
ylstyrene and NMO in t-BuOH-H2O was stirred for 8 h. The
diol was obtained in 10% yield. To the filtrate,a-methylstyrene
and NMO were added and stirred at room temperature for 8 h.
The diol was obtained in good yield.
[1] a) A. Domling, I. Ugi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993,
32, 563–564; b) C. A. Roessner, A. I. Scott, Chemistry
and Biology 1996, 3, 325–330; c) P. A. Wender, S. T.
Handy, D. L. Wright, Chem. Ind. 1997, 766–769; d) J. S.
Kingsbury, S. B. Garber,J. M. Giftos, B. L. Gray, M. M.
Okamoto, R. A. Farrer, J. T. Fourkas, A. H. Hoveyda,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4251–4256; e) J. Louie,
C. W. Bielawski, R. H. Grubbs, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2001,
123, 11312–11313.
[2] a) N. Jeon, S. D. Seo, J. Y. Shin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 10220–10221; b) D. J. Kopecky, S. D. Rychnovsky, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8420–8421; c) Y. Guindon, K.
Houde, M. Prevost, B. Cardinal-David, S. K. Landry, B.
Daoust, M. Bencheqroun, B. Guerin, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 8496–8501; d) S. Yamasaki, M. Kanai,
M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1256–1257;
e) R. Annunziata, M. Benaglia, M. Cinquini, F. Cozzi,
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 1045–1048.
[3] H.-B. Yu, Q. -S. Hu, L. Pu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
6500–6501.
[4] a) H. C. Kolbe, M. S. VanNieuwenhze, K. B. Sharpless,
Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2483; b) . J. S. M. Wai, I. E. Marko,
J. S. Svendsen, M. G. Finn, E. N. Jacobsen, K. B. Sharp-
less, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1123; c) . Z.-M.
Wang, K. B. Sharpless, J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 8302;
d) X. Lu, Z. Xu, G. Yang, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2000,
4, 575;e) S. Nagayama, M. Endo, S. Kobayashi, J . Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 6094–6095; f) S. Kobayashi, M. Endo,
S. Nagayama, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11229–
11230; g) S. Kobayashi, T. Ishida, R. Akiyama, Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 2649–2652; h) T. Ishida, R. Akiyama, S.
Kobayashi, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 576–579.
[5] a) B. M. Choudary, N. S. Chowdari, K. Jyothi, M. L.
Kantam, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5341–5345; b)
B. M. Choudary, N. S. Chowdari, M. L. Kantam, K. V.
Raghavan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9220–9221;
c) B. M. Choudary, N. S. Chowdari, S. Madhi, M. L.
Kantam, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4620–4623.
[6] A. Severeyns, D. E. De Vos, L. Fiermans, F. Verpoort,
P. J. Grobet, P. A. Jacobs, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 586–589.
These results strongly suggest that the leached Os species on
treatment with NMO in the absence of olefin could not be re-
exchanged on the support during the reaction after the addi-
tion of olefin.
Experiment 5: Whenthe reaction was conducted with the fil-
trate obtained by the treatment of the catalyst, Mg-PdOs and
Mg-OsW, in a solvent system used as described above, for a
prolonged time, no product formation was observed and recon-
firmed by SEM-EDAX.
These results as presented here indicate that the palladium,
osmium and tungsten metals remained bound on the MgO ma-
trix throughout the reaction
Iodometry Test
Theabsence of osmium inthe filtrate is further confirmed using
the iodometry test. The iodometry test was performed the
treatment of the catalyst in H2O-CH3CN-acetone (1:1:1) sol-
vent system. The catalyst was filtered and the filtrate was treat-
ed with potassium iodide and HCl. The solution was titrated
with sodium thiosulfate in the presence of starch, and no for-
mation of iodine was observed.
[7] a) K. Bergstad, S. Y. Jonsson, J.-E. Bäckvall, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10424–10425; b) S. Y. Jonsson,
K. Farnegardh, J.-E, Bäckvall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 1365–1371; c) S. Y. Jonsson, H. Adolfsson, J.-E,
Bäckvall, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 3463–3466; d) A. H. Ell,
S. Y. Jonsson, A. Borje, H. Adolfson, J.-E. Bäckvall, Tet-
rahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2569–2571.
[8] B. M. Choudary, K. Jyothi, M. L. Kantam, B. Sreedhar,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 45–48.
[9] a) R. Richards, W. Li, S. Decker, C. Davidson, O. Koper,
V. Zaikovski, A. Volodin, T. Rieker, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 4921–4925; b) M. Utiyama, H. Hattori, K. Ta-
nabe, J. Catal. 1978, 53, 237; c) A. Pelmenschikov, G. Mo-
rosi, A. Gamba, S. Coluccia, J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99,
15018–15022.
Acknowledgements
K. Jyothi thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Re-
search (CSIR) India, and Moumita Roy thanks University
Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi for the award of a re-
search fellowship.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1471–1480
asc.wiley-vch.de
ꢀ 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1479