C. Liu, E. Iwanowicz / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 1409–1411
1411
increased significantly to 20:1 and 14:1, respectively.
When the adduct of phenyl isothiocyanate and sodium
hydrogencyanamide was reacted with phenyl hydrazine
and EDC, triazoles 1d19 and 2d were obtained in a ratio
of 19:1 (entry 4). A very similar selectivity (1j:2j=20:1)
was observed in entry 10, where an aliphatic isothio-
cyanate was used. The very high preference of forma-
tion of 1d and 1j in entries 4 and 10 can be understood
because the phenyl moiety makes the directly connected
nitrogen of the hydrazine not only more hindered but
also less electron rich. Entry 5 showed that when the
phenyl was substituted with a 4-trifluoromethyl elec-
tron-withdrawing group, nucleophilicity of the more
hindered nitrogen was further reduced and conse-
quently the regioselectivity could be further improved.
In this case, triazole 1e was the only detected product.
In entry 6, an electronic donating 4-methoxy would be
expected to offset, to some extent, the electronic effect
produced by the phenyl itself. As a result, a poorer
selectivity for 1f over 2f (12:1) was encountered.
4. Gespach, C.; Menez, I.; Emami, S. Biosci. Rep. 1983, 3,
871–878.
5. Steck, E. A.; Brundage, R. P.; Fletcher, L. T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 3929–3931.
6. Wu, M. T. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1977, 14, 443–444.
7. Reiter, J.; Pongo´, L.; Somorai, T.; Dvortsa´k, P. J. Hete-
rocyclic Chem. 1986, 23, 401–408.
8. Webb, R. L.; Labaw, C. S. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1982,
19, 1205–1206.
9. Webb, R. L.; Eggleston, D. S.; Labaw, C. S.; Lewis, J. J.;
Wert, K. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1987, 24, 275–278.
10. Garratt, P. J.; Thorn, S. N.; Wrigglesworth, R. Tetra-
hedron 1993, 49, 165–176.
11. Dunstan, A. R.; Weber, H.-P.; Rihs, G.; Widmer, H.;
Dziadulewicz, E. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7983–
7986.
12. Atwal, K. S.; Ahmed, S. Z.; O’Reilly, B. C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 7313–7316.
13. Compound 1a: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): l 8.72 (1H, s), 7.51
(2H, d, J=7.9 Hz), 7.17 (2H, dd, J=7.9, 7.2 Hz), 6.74
(1H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 6.31 (2H, s), 4.08 (2H, t, J=6.4 Hz),
2.92 (2H, t, J=6.4 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): l 157.6,
154.4, 142.6, 128.8, 119.0, 118.9, 116.0, 41.4, 17.7.
14. Compound 2a: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): l 8.78 (1H, s), 7.57
(2H, d, J=7.7 Hz), 7.26 (2H, dd, J=7.7, 6.9 Hz), 6.89
(1H, t, J=6.9 Hz), 5.26 (2H, s), 4.17 (2H, t, J=6.0 Hz),
2.93 (2H, t, J=6.0 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): l 161.2,
150.4, 143.2, 141.2, 129.0, 120.9, 119.0, 117.4, 41.4, 17.9.
15. Compound 1b: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): l 8.60 (1H, s), 7.48
(2H, d, J=7.8 Hz), 7.15 (2H, dd, J=7.8, 7.8 Hz), 6.70
(1H, t, J=7.3 Hz), 6.04 (2H, s), 3.91 (1H, m), 1.83–1.64
(7H, m), 1.34 (2H, m), 1.18 (1H, m); 13C NMR (DMSO-
d6): l 156.9, 152.9, 143.0, 128.7, 118.5, 115.7, 53.8, 32.0,
25.4, 25.3.
In conclusion, we have reported a convenient synthesis
of 1,2,4-triazole-3,5-diamine derivatives from isothio-
cyanates, sodium hydrogencyanamide, and hydrazines.
This procedure has the advantage of one-pot operation
that gives the desired products in high yields. The
method has particular utility for the preparation of
triazole 1 and is far more convenient and efficient than
previously reported methods.
A representative procedure is demonstrated by the prepa-
ration of 1b and 2b: To a solution of phenyl isothio-
cyanate (0.276 g 2.00 mmol) in dry DMF was added
sodium hydrogencyanamide (0.137 g, 2.10 mmol) at
room temperature in one portion. The mixture was
heated at 60°C for 1 h before triethylamine (0.50 mL,
3.59 mmol), cyclohexyl hydrazine hydrochloride (0.452
g, 3.00 mmol), and EDC (0.479 g, 2.50 mmol) were
added at room temperature. The mixture was heated at
60°C for an additional 1 h, and diluted with ethyl
acatate (100 mL), washed with water (3×25 mL) and
10% lithium chloride solution (3×30 mL). The organic
solution was dried over anhydrous MgSO4. A mixture
of 1b and 2b (0.424 g, 82% yield) was isolated as a
white solid by chromatography (silica gel, 5%
methanol/chloroform). Analytical samples of 1b and 2b
were obtained by preparative HPLC.
16. Compound 2b: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): l 8.50 (1H, s), 7.52
(2H, d, J=7.8 Hz), 7.23 (2H, dd, J=7.8, 7.8 Hz), 6.84
(1H, t, J=7.3 Hz), 5.04 (2H, s), 4.12 (1H, m), 1.81–1.64
(7H, m), 1.36 (2H, m), 1.16 (1H, m); 13C NMR (DMSO-
d6): l 160.5, 148.8, 141.8, 128.9, 120.4, 117.1, 53.8, 32.4,
25.4, 25.3.
17. Compound 1c: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): l 8.57 (1H, s), 7.49
(2H, d, J=8.0 Hz), 7.14 (2H, dd, J=8.0, 7.2 Hz), 6.70
(1H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 5.78 (2H, s), 1.52 (9H, s); 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6): l 155.2, 152.9, 143.0, 128.7, 118.5, 115.7,
56.6, 28.9.
1
18. Compound 2c: H NMR (DMSO-d6): l 7.65 (1H, s), 7.18
(2H, dd, J=8.5, 7.3 Hz), 7.08 (2H, d, J=8.5, 7.2 Hz),
6.79 (1H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 5.04 (2H, s), 1.52 (9H, s); 13C
NMR (DMSO-d6): l 159.6, 148.4, 143.8, 128.9, 119.9,
116.6, 57.8, 29.6.
References
19. Compound 1d: 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): l 8.92 (1H, s),
7.60–7.48 (6H, m), 7.29 (1H, t, J=7.2 Hz), 7.20 (2H, dd,
J=7.2, 7.2 Hz), 6.77 (1H, t, J=7.2), 6.75 (2H, s); 13C
NMR (DMSO-d6): l 158.0, 153.5, 142.4, 138.1, 129.6,
128.9, 126.0, 122.0, 119.2, 116.2.
1. Liu, C.; Dhar, T. G. M.; Gu, H. H.; Iwanowicz, E. J.;
Leftheris, K.; Pitts, W. J. US Patent 6,399,773, 2002.
2. Stemp, G.; Burrell, G. US Patent 5,232,938, 1993.
3. Cornu, P.-J.; Perrin, C.; Dumaitre, B.; Streichenberger,
G. US Patent 4,569,933, 1986.