Cu r ved Ha m m ett P lot in Alk a lin e Hyd r olysis of O-Ar yl
Th ion oben zoa tes: Ch a n ge in Ra te-Deter m in in g Step ver su s
Gr ou n d -Sta te Sta biliza tion
Ik-Hwan Um,* J i-Youn Lee, Han-Tae Kim,† and Sun-Kun Bae†
Department of Chemistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea
ihum@mm.ewha.ac.kr
Received December 22, 2003
Second-order rate constants have been measured for alkaline hydrolysis of O-aryl thionobenzoates
(X-C6H4-CS-OC6H4-Y) in 80 mol % H2O-20 mol % DMSO at 25.0 ( 0.1 °C. The Hammett plot for
the reaction of O-4-nitrophenyl X-substituted thionobenzoates (X-C6H4-CS-OC6H4-NO2, 1a -e)
exhibits a downward curvature. However, a possible traditional explanation in terms of a change
in the rate-determining step (RDS) has been considered but rejected. The proposed explanation
involves stabilization of the ground-state (GS) through-resonance interaction between the electron-
donating substituent X and the thionocarbonyl functionality on the basis of the linear Yukawa-
Tsuno plot obtained for the same reaction. The Brønsted-type plot for the reaction of O-aryl
thionobenzoates (C6H5-CS-OC6H4-Y, 2a -i) is linear but exhibits many scattered points with a small
âlg (-0.35). The Hammett plot for the same reaction shows rather poor correlation with σ- constants
but much better correlation with σ° constants. The alkaline hydrolysis of O-aryl thionobenzoates
(1a -e and 2a -i) has been proposed to proceed through an addition intermediate in which bond
formation is the RDS.
In tr od u ction
to proceed in a stepwise manner with one or two inter-
mediates.1-7 Castro et al. have reported that the reaction
of aryl 4-nitrophenyl thionocarbonates with weakly basic
amines (e.g., piperazinium ion and 1-formylpiperazine)
proceeds through two intermediates (e.g., a zwiterionic
T( and its deprotonated anionic T-), while the corre-
sponding reaction with strongly basic amines (e.g., pip-
eridine and piperazine) proceeds through one interme-
diate (T().1,2 Lee et al. have suggested that the nature of
reaction medium is also an important factor to determine
the reaction mechanism, since the deprotonation process
from T( to T-, which has often been observed as the rate-
determinining step for the reaction in H2O, is absent for
aminolysis of aryl dithioacetates and their related esters
in MeCN.3a However, we have recently reported that the
reaction of O-4-nitrophenyl thionobenzoate with alicyclic
secondary amines proceeds through two intermediates
regardless of amine basicity and the nature of the
reaction medium.4a
On the other hand, the reactions of thionocarbonyl
derivatives with anionic nucleophiles have been sug-
gested to proceed either in a stepwise manner with one
intermediate or in a concerted manner without an inter-
mediate.8,9 Castro et al. have proposed that the reactions
of bis(4-nitrophenyl) and methyl 4-nitrophenyl thiono-
carbonates with substituted phenoxides proceed in a
stepwise manner with a change in the rate-determining
Nucleophilic substitution reactions of thionocarbonyl
derivatives (e.g., R-CS-OR′, R-CS-SR′, RO-CS-OR′,
RO-CS-SR′ etc.) have intensively been investigated in
recent years.1-5 Reactions of thionocarbonyl compounds
with amine nucleophiles have generally been understood
† Department of Chemistry, Kunsan National University, Kunsan
573-701, Korea.
(1) Castro, E. A. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3505-3524.
(2) (a) Castro, E. A.; Bessolo, J .; Aguayo, R.; Santos, J . G. J . Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 8157-8161. (b) Casto, E. A.; Galvez, A.; Leandro, L.;
Santos, J . G. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4309-4315. (c) Castro, E. A.;
Leandro, L.; Quesieh, N.; Santos, J . G. J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6130-
6135. (d) Castro, E. A.; Garcia, P.; Leandro, L.; Quesieh, N.; Rebolledo,
A.; Santos, J . G. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 9047-9053. (e) Castro, E. A.;
Leandro, L.; Santos, J . G. Int. J . Chem. Kinet. 1999, 31, 839-845. (f)
Castro, E. A.; Saavedra, C.; Santos, J . G.; Umana, M. I. J . Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 5401-5407.
(3) (a) Oh. H. K.; Woo, S. Y.; Shin, C. H.; Park, Y. S.; Lee, I. J . Org.
Chem. 1997, 62, 5780-5784. (b) Song, H. B.; Choi, M. H.; Koo, I. S.;
Oh, H. K.; Lee, I. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2003, 24, 91-94. (c) Oh, H.
K.; Ku, M. H.; Lee, H. W.; Lee. I. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8995-8998.
(d) Oh, H. K.; Ku, M. H.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. J . Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
3874-3877. (e) Oh, H. K.; Lee, Y. J .; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. New J . Chem.
2002, 26, 473-476. (f) Lee, I.; Lee, H. W.; Lee. B. C.; Choi, J . H. Bull.
Korean Chem. Soc. 2002, 23, 201-204. (g) Oh, H. K.; Kim, S. K.; Lee,
H. W.; Lee, I. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 1753-1757. (h)
Oh, H. K.; Kim, S. K.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. New J . Chem. 2001, 25, 313-
317. (i) Oh, H. K.; Kim, S. K.; Choi, I. H.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. J . Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 2306-2310. (j) Oh, H. K.; Lee, Y. H.; Lee,
I. Int. J . Chem. Kinet. 2000, 32, 131-135.
(4) (a) Um, I. H.; Seok, J . A.; Kim, H. T.; Bae, S. K. J . Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 7742-7746. (b) Um, I. H.; Lee, S. E.; Kwon, H. J . J . Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 8999-9005. (c) Um, I. H.; Kwon, H. J .; Kwon, D. S.
J . Chem. Res. Synop. 1995, 301.
(5) (a) Humeres, E.; Soldi, V.; Klug, M.; Numes, M.; Oliveira, C. M.
S.; Barrie, P. J . Can. J . Chem. 1999, 77, 1050-1056. (b) Faissat, L.;
Chavis, C.; Monetero, J . L.; Lucas, M. J . Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
2002, 1253-1259. (c) Rajarathnam, D.; Babu, J .; Nadar, P. A. Int. J .
Chem. Kinet. 2002, 34, 18-26.
(6) Campbell, P.; Lapinskas, B. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
5378-5382.
(7) (a) Hupe, D. J .; J encks, W. P. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 451-
464. (b) Pohl, E. R.; Wu, D.; Hupe, D. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
2759-2762. (c) Pohl, E. R.; Hupe, D. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102,
2763-2768.
10.1021/jo035854r CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/03/2004
2436
J . Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2436-2441