CROP PROTECTION RESEARCH
719
CHIMIA 2003, 57, No.11
[9] P. Schäfer, G. Hamprecht, E. Heistracher,
H. König, R. Klintz, P. Münster, H. Rang,
K.-O. Westphalen, M. Gerber, H. Walter,
‘Substituted 2-fused Phenylpyridines with
Herbicidal Activity’ (BASF AG), WO
95/02590, 1995.
[10] Y.C. Martin, ‘Quantitative Drug Design:
A Critical Introduction’ in ‘Medicinal
Research’, Ed. G.L. Grunewald, Marcel
Dekker, Inc., New York, 1978.
[11] C. Hansch, A. Leo, D. Hoekman, ‘Explor-
ing QSAR. Hydrophobic, Electronic, and
Steric Constants’, American Chemical
Society, Washington, 1995.
parine), tall morning glory (Pharbitis pur- tion – apparently decrease herbicidal activ-
purea), and ladysthumb (Polygonum persi- ity. The (1,4-benzoxazin-3-one-6-yl)-pyri-
caria)
dine m,p-anellation 30 is herbicidally more
active than the (benzoxazole-7-yl)-pyridine
derivative 31 with o,m-anellation.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Structure–Activity
Relationships (SAR)
3.1.1. Pyridine Moiety
4. Conclusion
Novel phenylpyridines were conceived
Electron-withdrawing substituents in based on molecular modeling-oriented
the pyridine moiety (Fig. 2) change the her- design – superposition of herbicidal N-
bicidal activity of the phenylpyridines in phenylimides and diarylethers. Their syn-
question. In position R1 trifluoromethyl thesis via Suzuki-coupling is the method of
roughly has the same steric requirement choice for obtaining high yields.
[12] P. J. Dehlinger, JPTOS 1992, 74, 463.
and lipophilicity as chlorine, but due to its
Phenylpyridines are potent inhibitors of
stronger electron-withdrawing properties is protoporphyrinogen-IX oxidase in plants,
herbicidally much more active. Difluoro- where they constitute a new herbicidal lead.
methylderivatives and methyl sulfonyl are They have strong herbicidal activity against
in between, either because of less electron- a broad range of grasses and broadleaf
withdrawing character and lipophilicity or weed species. Structure-activity relation-
as a result of just too much bulkiness in the ship studies show that the optimum sub-
methyl sulfonyl case [11][12]. Additional- stitution pattern of the pyridine ring is
ly, in position R2 electron-withdrawing 3-chloro-5-trifluormethyl. The phenyl ring
substituents are required. Chlorine and should be 4-chloro-2-fluoro-substituted
fluorine show comparable herbicidal activ- with an additional (high variable) sub-
ity, better than trifluoromethyl and superior stituent in the 5-position.
to methyl and ether substituents, which are
excessively electron-donating.
Most active side chains in the 5-position
of the phenyl ring are the N-methyl-N-
(alkoxy-carbonyl)alkyl sulfonamides, the
alkyl and (alkoxycarbonyl)alkyl carboxy-
3.1.2. Phenyl Moiety
In the phenyl moiety (Fig. 2) herbicidal lates, as well as the propargyl ether. Among
activity decreases in the R3 position on the benzanellated derivatives, the (1,4-ben-
passing from fluorine to hydrogen and zoxazin-3-one-6-yl)-pyridine substitution
chlorine by about a factor of 3 to 4. The R4 shows the strongest herbicidal activity.
position, on the other hand, is highly flexi- Phenylpyridines are also very good pre-
ble.
emergent herbicides (data not shown).
Received: September 15, 2003
3.1.3. SAR of the Phenyl Side Chain
The phenyl side chain in position R4
(Fig. 3) is highly variable and at a rate of
31.25 g/ha a.i. shows the same herbicidal
activity on broadleaf weeds, irrespective of
the electronic and steric character of the
chosen chain. But differences become evi-
dent upon examination of grass activity.
The most active is the sulfonamide side
chain 21, followed by esters like 18 and 19
and the ether 23. With propanoic esters 20
and oximes 22 grass activity falls into the
70% range. The methyl pyridyl sulfon 24
has insufficient grass activity.
[1] ‘Peroxidizing Herbicides’, Eds. P. Böger,
K.Wakabayashi, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,
Heidelberg, 1999.
[2] M. Matringe, R. Scalla, Brit. Crop Prot.
Conf. -Weeds-, 1987, Vol. 3, 981.
[4] S.O. Duke, J. M. Becerril, T. D. Sherman,
J. Lydon, H. Matsumoto, Pestic. Sci. 1990,
30, 367.
[5] R. Scalla, M. Matringe, J.-M. Camadro,
P. Labbe, Z. Naturforsch. 1990, 45c, 503.
[6] J. M. Jacobs, N. J. Jacobs, T. D. Sherman,
[7] P. Böger, K. Wakabayashi, Z. Naturforsch.
1995, 50c, 159.
3.1.4. SAR of Anellation
in Comparison
When anellation in the 3,4-phenyl posi-
tion is investigated, the 1,4-benzoxazin-3-
one heterocycle 26 is about twice as strong
on grasses as the 3,4-dihydro-1H-quinolin-
2-one type 25 or the related 1,4-benzoth-
iazin-3-one 27. Lowest grass activity is
shown by the 1,3-dihydro-indol-2-one type
28. Predetermined breaking points in the
heterocyclic nucleus – prone to metaboliza-
[8] P. Schäfer, G. Hamprecht, E. Heistracher,
H. König, R. Klintz, P. Münster, H. Rang,
K.-O. Westphalen, M. Gerber, H. Walter,
‘Substituted 2-Phenylpyridines with Her-
bicidal Action’ (BASF AG), WO
95/02580, 1995.