6594
M. R. Kaller et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 6591–6594
range. For example, phenylsulfone derived compounds 17 and 18
displayed IC50 values of 3.3 nM and 1.4 nM, respectively. It is worth
noting that the arylsulfone replacements greatly improved the po-
tency of molecules with less than ideal groups at the 2 position.
This was illustrated by compound 19 which displayed >150-fold
improvement in potency than the corresponding 4-pyridyl inhibi-
tor 16.
The arylsulfone derived inhibitors were very potent; however,
they gave lower brain exposure (17, 44 ng/g at 0.5 h, 2 mg/kg IV
dose in rats) in comparison to the 4-pyridyl substituted molecules.
This is not that surprising considering the higher polar surface area
for these compounds along with lower permeability (typically 2–
6 Â 10À6 cm/s) these compounds demonstrated in comparison to
the 4-pyridyl substituted molecules. Therefore, we focused our fur-
ther exploration on the pyridyl compounds. Table 3 shows selected
examples where the 2 position of the 4-pyridyl was substituted.
Initially, this position was explored to mitigate possible CYP 450
inhibition due to the 4-pyridine; however it was soon evident that
this additional substitution could also offer other benefits. The
chloro derivative 20 had comparable potency to parent molecule
4, while the aminopyridine compound 21 gave a sixfold improve-
ment in activity. Although inhibitor 23 showed comparable activ-
ity to 4, the other two alkylaminopyridine compounds 22 and 24
demonstrated a 10- and 5-fold increase in potency, respectively.
In contrast to the aminopyridines, alkoxypyridines, such as 25,
proved to be less potent.
Table 4 summarizes the effects of replacing the ethyl ester. It
should be noted here that these esters can be viewed as vinylogous
carbamates and therefore are more stable than typical esters. This
is consistent with the observation that the hydrolysis of these es-
ters required very forcing conditions during synthesis (KOH,
5 equiv, in aqueous EtOH for 10 min at 120 °C in the microwave
synthesizer). Based on this observation, we reasoned that it was
worth exploring a variety of ester analogs. We quickly found that
the hydrophobic alkyl ester analogs, exemplified by the phenethyl
ester 26, provided no improvement in potency in comparison to
the ethyl ester. Drawing analogy to the SAR in the acyclic thiazole
urea series for improving potency and solubility, we incorporated
alkylamino groups into the ester sidechain. We found that a large
number of substituted or ring constrained aminoethyl esters were
potent CDK5 inhibitors (27 and 29–31, Table 4). Interestingly,
substituted aminopropyl ester 32 was found to be a potent inhib-
itor, while its ring constrained variant 28 was 13-fold less potent.
Based on previous crystal structures of 1 and molecular model-
ing of 2 we propose that the 6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine series
binds in a similar U-shape configuration where in the 6-oxo-1,6-
dihydropyridine is involved in a donor-acceptor hydrogen bonding
network with Leu83 (Fig. 2). In this model, the thiazole-pyridine
extends down to make an interaction with the Lys33-Asp145 salt
bridge of the ATP binding site. In addition, Lys89 also makes a
hydrogen bond with the carbonyl of the ester. These binding inter-
actions reconcile well with the observed SAR in this series.
In summary, guided by an active site homology model and SAR
from our early studies in the 3,4-dihydro-1H-quinazolin-2-one and
quinilon-2H-ones series,7,8 we were able to develop a new series of
6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridines as potent CDK5 inhibitors. We ex-
plored the 2 position of the 6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine core and
determined that small alkyl substituents were optimal. Further-
more, we found that the 4-pyridyl group on the thiazole ring was
a good compromise for maximizing potency and maintaining ade-
Figure 2. A proposed binding mode for 6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridine (27)–CDK2
complex. Nitrogen atoms are shown in blue, oxygen atoms are shown in red, sulfur
atoms are shown in yellow, and carbon atoms of active site residues are shown in
gray. Carbon atoms of compounds 27 are shown in green.
quate brain exposure. The initial ethyl ester could be replaced with
esters that also provided modestly improved potency and im-
proved solubility.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Vellarkad Viswanadhan and Kristin Andrews
for their modeling support. In addition, the authors would like to
thank Jiandong Zhang and Timothy Osslund, of the molecular
structure group, for their support.
References and notes
1. Dhavan, R.; Tsai, L.-H. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 749.
2. Smith, D. S.; Tsai, L.-H. TRENDS Cell Biol. 2002, 12, 28.
3. (a) Tsai, L.-H.; Lee, M.-S.; Cruz, J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1697, 137–142; (b)
Maccioni, R. B.; Otth, C.; Concha, I. I.; Munoz, J. P. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268,
1518.
4. Patzke, H.; Tsai, L.-H. Trends Neurosci. 2002, 25, 8.
5. (a) Wang, J.; Lui, S.; Fu, Y.; Wang, J. H.; Lu, Y. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6, 1039; (b)
Weishaupt, J. H.; Kussmaul, L.; Grotsch, P.; Heckel, A.; Rohde, G.; Romig, H.;
Bahr, M.; Gillardson, F. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2003, 24, 489; (c) Wang, F.; Corbett,
D.; Osuga, H. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22, 171; (d) Osuga, H.; Osuga, S.;
Wang, F.; Fetni, R.; Hogan, M. J.; Slack, R. S.; Hakim, A. M.; Ikeda, J. E.; Park, D. S.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2000, 97, 10254.
6. Santora, V.; Askew, B.; Ghose, A.; Hague, A.; Kim, T. S.; Laber, E.; Li, A.; Lian, B.;
Liu, G.; Norman, M. H.; Smith, L.; Tasker, A.; Tegley, C.; Yang, K. International
Patent WO 02/014311, 2002.
7. Rzasa, R. M.; Kaller, M.; Liu, G.; Magal, E.; Nguyen, T.; Osslund, T. D.; Powers, D.;
Santora, V. J.; Wang, H.-L.; Xiaoling Xiong, X.; Zhong, W.; Norman, M. H. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 6574.
8. Zhong, W.; Liu, H.; Kaller, M.; Henley; Charles; Magal; Ella; Nguyen, T.;
Osslund, T. D.; Powers, D.; Rzasa, R.; Wang, H.-L.; Wang, W.; Xiaoling Xiong, X.;
Zhang, J.; Norman, M. H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 5384.
9. Mosti, L.; Schenone, P.; Iester, M.; Dorigo, P.; Gaion, R. M.; Fraccarollo, D. Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 1993, 28, 853.
10. Nomura, M.; Shuto, S.; Matsuda, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5016.
11. Miletin, M.; Hartl1, J.; Dolezal, M.; Odlerova, Z.; Kralova, K.; Machacek, M.
Molecules 2000, 5, 208.
12. Lipinski, C.; LaMattina, J.; Hohnke, L. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 1628.
13. Huang, Q.; Kaller, M.; Nguyen, T.; Norman, M. H.; Rzasa, R.; Wang, H.-L.; Zhong,
W. Int. Patent WO 03/101985, 2003.