Rigid Cone Calix[4]arene Dimers
Exp er im en ta l Section
The tetraamine 113,23 and the tetratolylurea calix[4]arenes
2a
3a (Y ) C5H11
,
C10H211c) were synthesized in accordance with
the published procedures.
5,11,17,23-Tetr a tolylu r ea -25,27,26,28-biscr ow n -3-ca lix-
[4]a r en e (2a ). Tolyl isocyanate (0.193 g, 1.45 mmol) was added
to a solution of amine 1 (0.280 g, 0.447 mmol) in chloroform
(20 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at 20
°C. Methanol (50 mL) was added, and a white precipitate
formed was filtered off, washed with methanol (3 × 10 mL),
and crystallized additionally from
a chloroform/methanol
mixture, yielding a white crystalline compound (0.310 g,
60%): mp >300 °C dec; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.41
(s, 4H, NH), 8.17 (s, 4H, NH), 7.27 (d, 8H, 3J H,H ) 8.3 Hz, CH),
3
7.11 (br d, 4H, CHcal), 7.08 (br d, 4H, CHcal), 7.03 (d, 8H, J H,H
2
) 8.3 Hz, CH), 4.92 and 3.19 (two d, 4H, J H,H ) 11.7 Hz,
2
ArCH2Ar), 4.40 and 2.92 (two d, 2H, J H,H ) 11.8 Hz, ArCH2-
Ar), 4.20-4.13 (m, 12H, OCH2CH2O), 3.64-3.59 (m, 4H, OCH2-
1
CH2O), 2.21 (s, 12H); H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, integration
is given for a dimeric species): δ 9.35 (s, 2H, NH), 9.26 (s, 2H,
F IGURE 5. High-field window of 1H NMR spectra (600 MHz,
chloroform-d, 25 °C) recorded for ureas 2a and 3a in the
presence of mixtures of the indicated guest and methylcyclo-
pentane. The signals of the methyl group of the included
methylcyclopentane are indicated (b). [Host] ) 1 mM, [guest]
) 20 mM, [methylcyclopentane] ) 20 mM.
4
NH), 9.22 (s, 2H, NH), 9.13 (s, 2H, NH), 7.80 (d, 2H, J H,H
)
2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.78 (d, 2H, 4J H,H ) 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.72-7.67 (m,
16H, ArH), 7.64 (d, 2H, 4J H,H ) 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.61 (d, 2H, 4J H,H
) 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.38 (s, 2H, NH), 7.23-7.06 (m, 22H, ArH
4
4
and NH), 5.98 (d, 2H, J H,H ) 2.0 Hz, ArH), 5.94 (d, 2H, J H,H
) 2.0 Hz, ArH), 5.92 (d, 2H, 4J H,H ) 2.0 Hz, ArH), 5.86 (d, 2H,
4J H,H ) 2.0 Hz, ArH), 4.69 (d, 2H, J H,H ) 11.8 Hz, ArCH2Ar),
2
TABLE 1. Rela tive Bin d in g Con sta n ts KG/KM of Dim er s
of Rigid a n d F lexible Tetr a u r ea Ca lix[4]a r en es 2a a n d 3a
(Y ) C10H21) for Differ en t Gu ests vs Meth ylcyclop en ta n ea
2
4.67 (d, 2H, J H,H ) 11.6 Hz, ArCH2Ar), 4.23-3.94 (m, 28H,
2J H,H ) 11.8 Hz, ArCH2Ar and OCH2), 3.65-3.56 (m, 8H,
OCH2), 2.88-2.77 (m, 8H, ArCH2Ar), 2.26 (s, 24H, ArCH3);
13C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 153.4; 151.2, 149.6, 138.1,
136.0, 135.4, 134.7, 131.1, 129.9, 129.4, 120.3, 119.3, 118.9,
77.3, 74.9, 21.1; ESI/MS m/z (relative intensity, %) 1179.5 (M
+ Na+, 100).
guest
2a ‚2a
3a ‚3a
4-methylcyclohexanone
3-methylcyclohexanone
2-methylcyclohexanone
3-methylcyclopentanone
2,2-dimethylcyclopentanone
2-methylcyclopentanone
0.28
1.10
0.60
0.59
2.00
1.50
1.10
0.71
0.76
1.10
1.90
2.60
4-[Tr is(4′-ter t-bu tylp h en yl)m eth yl]p h en yl Ca r ba m ic
Acid 4-Nitr op h en yl Ester (4b). A solution of 4-(tris(4′-tert-
butyl-phenyl)methyl)aniline24 (1.525 g, 3.03 mmol) and 4-ni-
trophenylchloroformiate (0.671 g, 3.33 mmol) in chloroform (20
mL) was stirred for 3 h at 20 °C. Then hexane (50 mL) was
added, and the precipitate formed was filtered off, washed with
hexane (3 × 10 mL), and dried, yielding a white crystalline
compound (1.59 g, 78%): mp 218-223 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
a
[host] ) 1 mM, [guest] ) 20 mM, [methylcyclopentane] ) 20
mM; KG and KM ) binding constants for the guest and for
methylcyclopentane, respectively.
values collected in Table 1 show the differences in the
relative binding constants for calixarenes 2a and 3a ,
which, however, are difficult to rationalize. Most probably
they are not only caused by differences in size and shape
of the cavity due to the different flexibility of the host.
From the chemical shift of the methyl signals also
changes in the preferred orientations of the guest can be
deduced that cause differences in the magnetic shielding
experienced by the guest. These factors cannot be teased
apart.
3
DMSO-d6) δ 8.26 and 7.36 (two d, 4H, J H,H ) 8.8 Hz), 7. 29
3
and 7.20 (two d, 4H, J H,H ) 8.9 Hz), 7.25 and 7.08 (two d,
3
12H, J H,H ) 8.5 Hz), 6. 95 (s, 1H), 1.30 (s, 27H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ ) 155.40, 150.07, 148.51, 145.03,
143.84, 143.70, 134.15, 132.07, 130.66, 125.21, 124.16, 122.08,
117.70, 63.30, 34.29, 31.36. ESI/MS m/z (relative intensity, %)
691.5 (M + Na+, 25).
5,11,17,23-Tet r a {4-[t r is(4′-ter t-b u t ylp h en yl)m et h yl]-
p h en yl}u r ea -25,27,26,28-biscr ow n -3-ca lix[4]a r en e (2b).
Diisopropylethylamine (76 µL, 0.411 mmol) was added in one
portion to a solution of tetraamine 1 (42.8 mg, 0.069 mmol)
and active urethane 4b (229 mg, 0.343 mmol) in DMF (25 mL)
and chloroform (1 mL). The solution was stirred at 70 °C for
15 h. After cooling to room temperature, a precipitate was
filtered off, washed with DMF (3 × 5 mL), and dried. The
resulting solid was dissolved in chloroform (2 mL) and
precipitated by adding methanol (20 mL). A white crystalline
compound was filtered off, washed with methanol (4 × 5 mL),
and dried, yielding 66.5 mg (35%) of the desired compound:
mp >330 °C dec; 1H NMR (400 MHz, benzene-d6, integration
is given for a dimeric species) δ 9.88 (s, 2H, NH), 9.86 (s, 2H,
NH), 9.62 (s, 2H, NH), 9.60 (s, 2H, NH), 8.18 and 5.94 (two d,
Con clu sion s
Rigidification of the calix[4]arene skeleton by two di-
(ethylene glycol) bridges between adjacent oxygen atoms
leads to remarkable changes in the properties of the
respective tetraurea derivatives. Dimeric capsules formed
by 2a and 2b show increased thermodynamic and kinetic
stabilities in comparison with the more flexible analogues
3a and 3b. In both pairs the stability is higher for bulky
urea residues (2b/3b vs 2a /3a ). Differences in the selec-
tivity of guest inclusion are also noticed between both
types of tetraurea calix[4]arenes. Most remarkable is the
exclusive formation of both homodimers and the complete
absence of heterodimers in a solution containing a 1:1
mixture of a flexible and a rigidified tetraurea. This
observation will be further discussed in the sequel.
4
4
4H, J H,H ) 1.8 Hz, CHcal), 8.14 and 5.91 (two d, 4H, J H,H
)
3
1.8 Hz, CHcal), 8.07 and 7.55 (two d, 8H, J H,H ) 8.8 Hz, CH),
8.07 and 7.51 (two d, 8H, J H,H ) 8.8 Hz, CH), 7.97 and 5.81
3
(23) Arduini, A.; Mirone, L.; Paganuzzi, D.; Pinalli, A.; Pochini, A.;
Secchi, A.; Ungaro, R. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 6011-6018.
(24) Gibson, H. W.; Lee, S.-H.; Engen, P. T.; Lecavalier, P.; Sze, J .;
Shen, Y. X.; Bheda, M. J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3748-3756.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 18, 2004 6119