of the nitrogen centred radical created in this case. Only lactam 21
(55%) was produced from allylsulfonamide 20, and substrate 22
gave rise to 2 : 3 mixture of epimeric lactams 23 and 24 in 57%
yield. This latter example contrasts with that of 14 which gave 16
as only one epimer. The presence of the aromatic ring allowed one
further twist in the radical sequence when the open chain precursor
25 was subjected to the same reaction conditions. The reaction
produced polycyclic derivative 28 in 58% yield. The “normal”
lactam 27 was not observed even though it could be formed during
the reaction but then converted into 28 through the reversible
exchange of the xanthate group. The presence of the xanthate group
is a powerful asset in view of the numerous possible further
transformations.4,5
In summary, these preliminary results demonstrate the potential
of this process for generating amidyl and perhaps other types of
nitrogen centred radicals. The precursors are readily available and
stable and the cyclisation can be easily incorporated into various
tandem sequences, thus opening a straightforward access to a
variety of complex structures. Further studies aimed at improving
the yield and extending the scope are under way.
We thank Rhodia for generous financial support to one of us
(CM), Dr Ghenwa Bouhadir for a preliminary experiment, and Drs
Jean-Marc Paris and François Metz of Rhodia for friendly
discussions.
Notes and references
†
Typical experimental procedure:
Synthesis of N-allylsulfonamides: Triethylamine (1–1.2 eq.) and isobutyl
chloroformate (1–1.2 eq.) were added to an ice cold solution of the
carboxylic acid (1 eq.) in dry THF (5.0 ml per mmole of acid) under an inert
atmosphere. In parallel, a solution of butyllithium in hexanes (1.25 M;
1.05–1.2 eq.) was added to a cold (278°C) solution of the allysulfonamide
(1.0 eq.) in dry THF (5.0 ml per mmole) under an inert atmosphere. After
15 minutes, the second solution was cannulated into the first. The resulting
mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and then left stirring for
18 hours. Water and ether were then added and the layers separated. The
aqueous layer was further extracted with ether and the combined organic
layers combined, washed with brine, and dried over magnesium sulfate.
Filtration and evaporation gave a residue that was purified by flash
chromatography on silica (eluent: ether–petroleum ether mixtures) to give
the respective N-allylsulfonylamides.
Radical cyclisation: a solution of the N-allylsulfonylamide in 1,2-di-
chloroethane (0.5 M) and xanthate 10 (1.2 eq.) was refluxed for 15 minutes
under an inert atmosphere. Lauroyl peroxide was added in small portions
every 90 minutes (first 0.1 eq. then 0.05 eq.), until almost complete
disappearance of the starting material. Evaporation of the solvent and
purification of the residue by chromatography on silica gel (elutent: ether–
petroleum ether mixtures) gave the lactams and/or cyclic N-sulfonyl
lactams.
Scheme 3 Generation and cyclisation of amidyl radicals.
1 For a review, see: S. Z. Zard, Synlett, 1996, 1148.For more recent work,
see: J. Boivin, A.-M. Schiano, S. Z. Zard and H. Zhang, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1999, 40, 4531; F. Gagosz and S. Z. Zard, Synlett, 1999, 1978; F.
Gagosz, C. Moutrille and S. Z. Zard, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 2707; D. Gennet,
S. Z. Zard and H. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2003, 1870.
2 For recent work by other groups, see: L. El Kaim and C. Meyer, J. Org.
Chem., 1996, 61, 1556; X. Lin, D. Stien and S. M. Weinreb, Org. Lett.,
1999, 1, 637; X. Lin, D. Stien and S. M. Weinreb, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2000, 41, 2333.
3 J. Cassayre, F. Gagosz and S. Z. Zard, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41,
1783; J. Cassayre and S. Z. Zard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 6072; X.
Hoang-Cong, B. Quiclet-Sire and S. Z. Zard, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40,
2125.
4 For a review, see: F. Bertrand, F. Leguyader, L. Liguori, G. Ouvry, B.
Quiclet-Sire, S. Seguin and S. Z. Zard, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 2001, II4,
547.
5 For general reviews see: S. Z. Zard, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997,
36, 672; S. Z. Zard, Xanthates and Related Derivatives as Radical
Precursors, in Radicals in Organic Synthesis, (Eds P. Renaud, M. P.
Sibi), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, vol. 1, 90–108.
6 F. Montermini, E. Lacoˆte and M. Malacria, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 921; M.
L. E. N. da Mata, W. B. Motherwell and F. Ujjainwalla, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1997, 38, 137; 141; P. Bougeard and M. D. Johnson, J. Organomet.
Chem., 1981, 206, 221; M. S. Kharasch and R. A. Mosher, J. Org. Chem.,
1952, 17, 453.
7 M. Adamczyk, Y.-Y. Chen, P. G. Mattingly, J. F. Moore and K. Shreder,
Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 10899; P. Dauban and R. H. Dodd, Org. Lett.,
2000, 2, 2327.
Scheme 4 Generation and cyclisation of N-phenylamidyl radicals.
8 G. Binot, B. Quiclet-Sire, T. Saleh and S. Z. Zard, Synlett, 2003, 382.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 8 4 8 – 1 8 4 9
1849