be readily prepared by multicomponent ZrfZn methodol-
ogy.8 These compounds should also exhibit the structural
rigidity that is paramount to the conformational mimicry of
the peptide strand.
group (HCl, MeOH) and precipitation with Et2O provided
the hydrochloride salts 8a and 8b. N-Protection (Cbz-Cl,
NaHCO3) led to the fully protected amino acids 9a and 9b
(Scheme 2).
Our initial approach to R,â-cyclopropyl-γ-amino acids
failed as the conversion of propargylic ether 1 stopped at
the allylic amine 2 (Scheme 1). Only traces of C-cycloprop-
ylalkyl amide product could be isolated after prolonged
reaction times.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Cbz-dl-∆Phg-OMe and
Cbz-dl-∆Me∆Phg-OMe
Scheme 1. Propargyl Ether Approach
In contrast, the TBDPS-protected C-cyclopropylalkyl-
amides 4a and 4b were readily prepared on gram scale from
homopropargylic ethers 3a and 3b, respectively. Desilylation
(TBAF/AcOH) afforded 76% and 96% of alcohols 5a and
5b. Unfortunately, after conversion to the intermediate
selenide, oxidation and elimination9 afforded the desired
vinyl cyclopropanes 6a and 6b in poor yields. However, a
modification developed by Reich10 which involved oxidation
of the intermediate selenide with m-CPBA at low temperature
(-40 °C) followed by elimination in the presence of 5 equiv
of diisopropylamine afforded these alkenes in excellent yields
(82-88%, two steps). Ozonolysis in the presence of basic
methanol11 followed by N-deprotection of the phosphinoyl
R
The synthesis of the Me∆Phg residue necessitated the
combination of the water-accelerated methylalumination12
reaction with the Simmons-Smith cyclopropanation (Scheme
3).13 Carboalumination of 3a (Me3Al, Cp2ZrCl2, H2O)
followed by microwave-accelerated addition to diphenylphos-
phinoyl imine14 afforded the allylic amide 10. Treatment of
10 with Zn(CH2I)2‚DME complex15 afforded the desired
C-cyclopropylalkylamide 4c in excellent yield and dia-
stereoselectivity (>19:1 by 1H NMR). Desilylation (TBAF,
AcOH) followed by modified Grieco elimination led to 6c
which was transformed into the Cbz-protected 9c after
ozonolysis and an N-protective group switch.
(3) (a) Wipf, P.; Kendall, C.; Stephenson, C. R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5122. (b) Wipf, P.; Kendall, C.; Stephenson, C. R. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 761. (c) Wipf, P.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 2449. (d) Wipf, P.; Janjic, J.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2004, 2, 443.
(4) Wipf, P.; Kendall, C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2773.
(5) Wipf, P.; Stephenson, C. R. J.; Okumura, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 14694.
(6) For reviews on the synthesis of cyclopropyl amino acids, see (a)
Stammer, C. H. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2231. (b) Burgess, K.; Ho, K.-K.;
Moye-Sherman, D. Synlett 1994, 575.
(7) For examples of the use of cyclopropane-containing amino acids as
peptide mimics, see: (a) Burgess, K.; Ho, K.-K.; Pal, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 3808. (b) Martin, S. F.; Dorsey, G. O.; Gane, T.; Hillier,
M. C.; Kessler, H.; Baur, M.; Matha, B.; Erickson, J. W.; Bhat, T. N.;
Munshi, S.; Gulnik, S. V.; Topol, I. A. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 1581. (c)
North, M. J. Peptide Sci. 2000, 6, 301. (d) Martin, S. F.; Dwyer, M. P.;
Hartmann, B.; Knight, K. S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1305. (e) Hillier, M.
C.; Davidson, J. P.; Martin, S. F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1657. (f) Davidson,
J. P.; Lubman, O.; Rose, T.; Waksman, G.; Martin, S. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 205. (g) Reichelt, A.; Gaul, C.; Frey, R. R.; Kennedy, A.;
Martin, S. F. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4062. (h) Headley, A. D.; Ganesan,
R.; Nam, J. Biorg. Chem. 2003, 31, 99.
(8) We selected the ∆-prefix to indicate amino acid residues that have a
cyclopropane ring inserted into the backbone chain between carbonyl-C
and R-C.
(9) (a) Sharpless, K. B.; Young, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 947.
(b) Grieco, P. A.; Gilman, S.; Nishizawa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1485.
(c) Kutney, J. P.; Singh, A. K. Can. J. Chem. 1983, 61, 1111.
(10) (a) Reich, H. J.; Renga, J. M.; Reich, I. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975,
97, 5434. (b) Reich, H. J.; Wollowitz, S.; Trend, J. E.; Chow, F.;
Wendelborn, D. F. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 1697.
To examine the structural features of these new building
blocks in dipeptide conjugates, we prepared enantiomerically
pure derivatives by resolution of amine salts (Scheme 4).16
Hydrogenolysis (H2, Pd/C, MeOH) of 9a and 9c followed
(12) (a) Wipf, P.; Lim, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1068.
(b) Wipf, P.; Ribe, S. Chem. Commun. 2001, 299.
(13) (a) Simmons, H. E.; Smith, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5323.
(b) Simmons, H. E.; Smith, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 4256. (c)
Charette, A. B.; Beauchemin, A. Org. React. 2001, 58, 1. (d) Lebel, H.;
Marcoux, J.-F.; Molinaro, C.; Charette, A. B. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 977.
(14) For the diastereoselective addition of alkenylalanes to N-sulfin-
ylimines using conventional reaction conditions, see: Wipf, P.; Nunes, R.
L.; Ribe, S. HelV. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 3478. Microwave reactions were
performed in sealed tubes in a Biotage Emrys Optimizer at 300 W.
(15) Charette, A. B.; Prescott, S.; Brochu, C. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
1081.
(11) (a) Marshall, J. A.; Garofalo, A. W.; Sedrani, R. C. Synlett 1992,
643. (b) Marshall, J. A.; Garofalo, A. W. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3675.
1138
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 6, 2005