VOL. 49, 2005
Test agent
NEW QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES AGAINST L. CHAGASI
TABLE 1. Effect of novel quinoline compounds on L. chagasi and mammalian cytotoxicitya
1077
S.I.
IC50 (g mlϪ1) (95% C.I.)b for:
Cytotoxicity; IC50 (g mlϪ1
)
(95% C.I.)
Promastigotes Amastigotes
3a
0.79 (0.45–1.37)
0.091 (0.06–0.13)
18.78 (8.02–44.00)
1.79 (0.73–4.23)
Ͼ15
3.55 (3.34–3.78)
31.60 (19.82–50.38)
26.89 (20.47–35.34)
13.77 (10.75–17.62)
22.00 (16.24–29.80)
Ͼ100
3b
7.57
4a
Ͼ15
Ͼ15
4b
Sb Vc
29.55 (28.09–31.09)
Ͼ3.38
Pentamidine
2.02 (1.75–2.35)
2.57 (2.23–2.96)
a Promastigotes were incubated with compounds and standard drugs for 24 h at 24°C. RAW 264.7 cells were incubated for 48 h at 37°C, and the viability of both
parasite and RAW cells was determined using the MTT assay.
b C.I., confidence interval.
c Sb V, pentavalent antimony.
was determined at 540 nm using a Multiskan MS (Uniscience) microplate
reader.
Drug synthesis. Ethyl-2-acetylpent-4-enoate (compound 1a) and ethyl-(4E)-2-
concentrations, in a dose-dependent manner. A strong anti-
acetyl-5-phenylpent-4-enoate (compound 1b) were obtained by a previously de-
determined against L. chagasi promastigotes. Table 1 shows
that three of these compounds killed promastigotes at low
parasitic effect was observed for compounds 3b and 3a (IC50 Ͻ
0.8 g mlϪ1) compared to the standard drug, pentamidine,
which had an IC50 of 2.02 g mlϪ1. All compounds killed 100%
of parasites at the maximal concentration of 50 g mlϪ1; how-
ever, compound 4a was the least potent (IC50 ϭ 18.78 g
mlϪ1) and the most toxic against mammalian cells. Compound
4b showed a significant antiparasitic activity with an IC50 of
1.79 g mlϪ1, being at least 8.5-fold less toxic for mammalian
cells than the standard drug pentamidine.
scribed method (1, 2). Ethyl-(2Z)-2-(1-anilinoethylidene)pent-4-enoate (compound
2a) and ethyl-(2Z,4E)-2-(1-anilinoethylidene)-5-phenylpent-4-enoate (compound
2b) were obtained from ketoester 1a or 1b and excess of aniline in the presence
of molecular sieves: 5 Å (0.1 g/mmol) at 60°C for 24 h (16). 3-Substituted
4-hydroxyquinolines (compounds 3a and 3b) and 3-substituted 4-chloroquino-
lines (compounds 4a and 4b) were obtained by a previously described method (6,
7, 15).
(i) 3-Allyl-2-methylquinolin-4-ol (compound 3a). The yield was 1.494 g (75%)
of a pale yellow solid with a melting point of 244°C to 245°C. 1H nuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR) (DMSO-d6): 2.25 (s, 3H), 3.18 (d, 2H, J ϭ 6.0 Hz),
4.81 (d, 1H, J ϭ 9.3 Hz), 4.86 (d, 1H, J ϭ 15.2 Hz), 5.73 (ddt, 1H, J ϭ 15.2, J ϭ
9.3, and J ϭ 6.0 Hz), 7.16 (t, 1H, J ϭ 7.8 Hz), 7.37 (d, 1H, J ϭ 7.8 Hz), 7.48 (t,
1H, J ϭ 7.8 Hz), 7.95 (d, 1H, J ϭ 7.8 Hz), 11.37 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):
17.3, 28.7, 114.0, 116.1, 117.5, 122.4, 123.3, 125.1, 131.0, 136.4, 139.1, 146.7, 175.1.
MS (m/z): 199 [M]ϩ, 184, 92, 77. Analysis calculated for C13H13NO (199.25): C,
78.37; H, 6.58; N, 7.03. Found: C, 78.17; H, 6.39; N, 7.11.
(ii) 2-Methyl-3-[(2E)-3-phenylprop-2-enyl]quinolin-4-ol (compound 3b). The
yield was 1.542 g (56 %) of a yellow solid with a melting point of 238°C to 240°C.
1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 2.33 (s, 3H), 3.35 (d, 2H, J ϭ 5.6 Hz), 6.18 (dt, 1H, J ϭ
16.0 and J ϭ 5.7 Hz), 6.29 (d, 1H, J ϭ 16.0 Hz), 7.07 (t, 1H, J ϭ 7.1 Hz), 7.10 to
7.15 (m, 4H), 7.25 (d, 1H, J ϭ 7.2 Hz), 7.40 (d, 1H, J ϭ 8.0 Hz), 7.50 (t, 1H, J ϭ
7.5 Hz), 7.99 (d, 1H, J ϭ 7.9 Hz), 11.43 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): 17.5,
27.8, 116.3, 117.5, 122.4, 123.4, 125.1, 125.4, 125.7, 126.7, 128.4, 128.9, 131.0,
137.2, 139.1, 146.8, 175.2. MS (m/z): 275 [M]ϩ, 184, 92, 77. Analysis calculated for
(ii) Intracellular amastigotes. Peritoneal macrophages were
infected with L. chagasi amastigotes and treated with the test
compounds over the concentration range of 15 to 0.117 g
mlϪ1 (twofold dilution) for 120 h. Only compound 3b showed
a significant reduction in the number of intracellular amasti-
gotes, with an IC50 of 3.55 g mlϪ1. The sigmoid dose-response
curve showed 100% parasite inhibition for macrophages
treated with a drug concentration of less than 8.0 g mlϪ1 (Fig.
1). Despite the susceptibility of mammalian cells (RAW 264.7)
to the quinoline compounds in a range of 13 to 32 g mlϪ1
,
the S.I. of compound 3b was 7.5 (Table 1). Compound 3b
C
19H17NO (275.35): C, 82.88; H, 6.22; N, 5.09. Found: C, 82.57; H, 6.29; N, 5.01.
(iii) 3-Allyl-4-chloro-2-methylquinoline (compound 4a). The yield was 2.068 g
(95%) as a brown solid with a melting point of 140°C. 1H NMR (CDCl3): 3.23 (s,
3H), 3.86 (d, 2H, J ϭ 7.0 Hz), 4.98 (d, 1H, J ϭ 17.1 Hz), 5.23 (d, 1H, J ϭ 10.2 Hz),
5.93 (m, 1H), 7.89 (t, 1H, J ϭ 7.4 Hz), 8.02 (t, 1H, J ϭ 8.4 Hz), 8.39 (d, 1H, J ϭ
8.5 Hz), 9.06 (d, 1H, J ϭ 8.5 Hz). 13C NMR (CDCl3): 19.2, 33.6, 118.2, 122.2,
125.0, 125.9, 130.3, 130.8, 131.6, 134.1, 137.7, 150.6, 157.0. MS (m/z): 219, 217
[M]ϩ, 184, 182, 169, 167, 77. Analysis calculated for C13H13NCl (217.69): C,
71.73; H, 5.55; N, 6.43, Cl, 16.29. Found: C, 71.28; H, 5.39; N, 6.61, Cl, 16.59.
(iv) 4-Chloro-2-methyl-3-[(2E)-3-phenylprop-2-enyl]quinoline (compound
4b). The yield was 2.203 g (75%) as a brown solid with a melting point of 108°C.
1H NMR (CDCl3): 2.84 (s, 3H), 3.93 (d, 2H, J ϭ 3.4 Hz), 6.26 to 6.39 (m, 1H),
6.30 (d, 1H, J ϭ 15.9 Hz), 7.19 to 7.29 (m, 5H), 7.61 (t, 1H, J ϭ 8.3 Hz), 7.74 (t,
1H, J ϭ 8.3 Hz), 8.11 (d, 1H, J ϭ 8.3 Hz), 8.23 (d, 1H, J ϭ 8.3 Hz). 13C NMR
(CDCl3): 23.6, 33.63, 124.4, 124.7, 125.6, 125.9, 126.1, 127.3, 127.5, 128.0, 129.8,
130.2, 131.7, 136.7, 145.8, 158.7. MS (m/z): 295, 293 [M]ϩ, 260, 258, 182, 180, 77.
Analysis calculated for C19H16NCl (293.799): C, 77.68; H, 5.49; N, 4.77; Cl, 12.06.
Found: C, 77.38; H, 5.31; N, 4.62; Cl, 11.59.
Statistical analysis. Data represent the mean and standard deviation of du-
plicate or triplicate samples from two or three independent assays. The IC50s
were calculated using sigmoid dose-response curves in Graph Pad Prism 3.0
software, and the 95% confidence intervals are included in parentheses.
FIG. 1. Determination of the IC50 of compound 3b against L. cha-
gasi-infected macrophages. Pentavalent antimony was used as a stan-
dard drug. Macrophages were treated for 120 h at 37°C with drugs, and
the number of infected macrophages in Giemsa-stained glass cover-
slips was determined by light microscopy. Dose-response curves were
obtained in GraphPad Prism 3.0 software. Data are mean and standard
deviation.
RESULTS
Determination of the IC50. (i) Promastigotes. The antileish-
manial activity of the four quinoline compounds was initially