A R T I C L E S
Abe et al.
To make clear the influences of the protonation on poly-
(m-ethynylpyridine)s, rather higher basicity is required for the
pyridine moieties. Thus, we decided to develop a highly basic
poly(m-ethynylpyridine) by introducing dialkylamino groups to
each pyridine ring on the polymer.
Among a variety of pyridine derivatives, one of the well-
known compounds for its high basicity is 4-(dimethylamino)-
pyridine (DMAP), which is often utilized as a catalyst in organic
syntheses.13 This utility is largely due to the virtue of the
dialkylamino group that can stabilize the cationic conjugate acids
and electrophile adducts of the pyridine ring. For the design of
new highly basic polymer 2, we anticipated that the adoption
of a DMAP-like unit structure gives new properties and
functions of the polymer. Recently, Heemstra and Moore et al.
studied pyridine-containing m-phenylene ethynylene oligomers,
which showed interesting features due to the helix stabilization
by N-protonation or -methylation.14
Figure 1. Structure of poly(m-ethynylpyridine) 1 and its conformation
change induced by complexation with a saccharide guest (butoxy groups
were omitted).
In the molecular structure of 2, the DMAP-like 4-(N-methyl-
N-octylamino)pyridine units work as the centers for hydrogen
bonding and the octyl chains improve the solubility of the
polymer in organic media. The DMAP-like units are expected
to be quantitatively protonated by treatment with the proper acid
to alter the characteristics of 2. The protonation of pyridine into
pyridinium (1) converts the hydrogen-bonding mode of the ring
from acceptor to donor, (2) gives a cationic nature to the ring,
and (3) inverts the direction of the local dipole moment on the
ring. As a result, the supramolecular characteristics of polymer
2, e.g., the recognition ability for saccharides and the higher
order structure of the complex, will be affected.
Preparation of Basic Polymer 2. The targeted basic polymer
2 was prepared mainly by repeating the Sonogashira reaction
as shown in Scheme 1. To obtain a clean polymer of enough
length, trimer 11 was chosen as the synthetic unit for polym-
erization. First, commercially available 2,6-dibromopyridine (3)
was converted into 2,6-dibromo-4-nitropyridine (4) by the
procedure in the literature.15 The electron-deficient 4 was treated
with N-methyloctylamine to give 2,6-dibromo-4-(N-methyl-N-
octylamino)pyridine (5). Sonogashira reaction of 5 with excess
(trimethylsilyl)acetylene yielded 6, and the following protiode-
silylation afforded diethynylpyridine 7. On the other hand,
copper-mediated halogen exchange16 of 5 gave diiodopyridine
8. Diiodo trimer 9 was obtained by a coupling reaction using 7
and an excess amount of 8. Sonogashira reaction using (trim-
ethylsilyl)acetylene and an excess amount of 9 gave 10, and
the following protiodesilylation yielded 11, which was applied
to the final polymerization to 2. Before the protiodesilylation
of 10, the copper salt must surely be removed by washing with
aqueous 1,2-diaminoethane; otherwise Glaser coupling leads to
a byproduct diyne. For the polymerization to 2, a diluted solution
of 11 in DMF/i-Pr2NH was treated under the Sonogashira
reaction conditions to afford a crude mixture containing 2 after
Figure 2. Structures of basic poly(m-ethynylpyridine) 2 and DMAP.
polymers absorb. At this point, considering the basicity of the
pyridine moieties in the polymers, one may remark on the
possibility that protonation on the nitrogen atoms can alter the
nature of the ring moieties. The conversion of pyridine into
pyridinium will locally change the hydrogen-bonding and
electric properties of the rings and eventually influence the
higher order structures of the polymers. Herein we report the
development of (4-dialkylamino-2,6-pyridylene)ethynylene poly-
mer 2, saccharide binding of which is regulated by H+-induced
stabilization of the helical conformation (Figure 2).
Results
Molecular Design for Basic Poly(m-ethynylpyridine) 2. We
have expected that protonation would be effective for the
regulation of the properties and the structures for poly-
(m-ethynylpyridine)s. However, we were afraid that the basicity
of polymer 1 was not high enough to capture many protons on
the pyridine sites quantitatively. As protons are added one by
one to the polymer, the basicity of the intermediate conjugate
acids of the polymer becomes weaker. Therefore, one must use
a large excess amount of acid, which may behave as an inhibitor
for the hydrogen bonding between the polymer and saccharides.
(11) For reviews on helical foldamers and polymers, see: Hill, D. J.; Mio, M.
J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3893-
4011. Nakano, T.; Okamoto, Y. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 4013-4038.
Cornelissen, J. J. L. M.; Rowan, A. E.; Nolte, R. J. M.; Sommerdijk, N. A.
J. M. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 4039-4070. Schmuck, C. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2448-2452. See also ref 6. For artificial oligohydrazide
foldamers which recognize saccharides, see: Hou, J.-L.; Shao, X.-B.; Chen,
G.-J.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Jiang, X.-K.; Li, Z.-T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
12386-12394.
(12) Oligo(m-ethynylpyridine) derivatives are known to form double- or triple-
stranded helicates by complexing with a Cu(I) or Ag(I) ion. See: Kawano,
T.; Nakanishi, M.; Kato, T.; Ueda, I. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 350-351.
Kawano, T.; Kato, T.; Du, C.-X.; Ueda, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
6697-6700. Orita, A.; Nakano, T.; An, D. L.; Tanikawa, K.; Wakamatsu,
K.; Otera, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10389-10396. Orita, A.;
Nakano, T.; Yokoyama, T.; Babu, G.; Otera, J. Chem. Lett. 2004, 1298-
1299. Potts, K. T.; Horwitz, C. P.; Fessak, A.; Keshavarz-K, M.; Nash, K.
E.; Toscano, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10444-10445.
(13) Spivey, A. C.; Arseniyadis, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5436-
5441. Murugan, R.; Scriven, E. F. V. Aldrichimica Acta 2003, 36, 21-27.
Grondal, C. Synlett 2003, 1568-1569. Scriven, E. F. V. Chem. Soc. ReV.
1983, 12, 129-162. Ho¨fle, G.; Steglich, W.; Vorbru¨ggen, H. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17, 569-583. Shinkai, S.; Tsuji, H.; Hara, Y.; Manabe,
O. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1981, 54, 631-632.
(14) (a) Heemstra, J. M.; Moore, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 9234-9237. (b)
Heemstra, J. M.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1480-1481. (c)
Heemstra, J. M.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1648-1649.
(d) Goto, H.; Heemstra, J. M.; Hill, D. J.; Moore, J. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
889-892. (e) Heemstra, J. M.; Moore, J. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 659-662.
(15) Neumann, U.; Vo¨gtle, F. Chem. Ber. 1989, 122, 589-591.
(16) Suzuki, H.; Kondo, A.; Inouye, M.; Ogawa, T. Synthesis 1986, 121-122.
9
16190 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 46, 2005