3
OH
OH
OH
OMe
OH
OH
OMe
O
O
ii
i
OMe
OMe
O
O
O
OMe
O
O
H
H
H
H
14
11
randaiol
i
11
15
O
O
16
iii
ii
iii
O
O
O
OH
O
O
MeO
12
-myrcene
OMe
17
O
iv
1
HO
magterpenoid C
O
O
O
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (i) NaBH4, ethanol, 0 °C,
10 min., 99 % (ii) AlCl3, Me2S, 0 °C-rt, 2 h, 50% (iii) NaIO4,
MeOH:H2O (2:1), 0 °C, 10 min, 95 %. (iv) a) SiO2-gel, 2.5 h (b)
MnO2, dry DCM, reflux, 4 h, 67% over 2 steps.
18
OMe
O
O
MeO
13
CCDC 1940335
Scheme 5. Reagents and conditions: (i) MeOH, 0 °C, 1 h, 85%
(ii) (a) toluene, reflux, 12 h (b) dry DCM, MnO2, 5 h, 40% over 2
steps (iii) xylene, reflux, 12 h, 55%.
Finally with quinone 1 we executed its DA reaction with β-
myrcene as well as subsequent aromatization of the resultant
cycloadduct in a single pot under the best condition mentioned in
Table 1 to finally accomplish the synthesis of magterpenoid C in
a regioselective manner. The NMR spectral data of the synthetic
sample was found to be in good agreement with those reported
for the natural product (refer Supporting Information).5
of magterpenoid B via a protective DA reaction couldn’t
materialize, we look forward for the development of an alternate
approach. Efforts in this direction are currently underway in our
laboratory.
Next, attention was turned towards magterpenoid B and for
accomplishing its synthesis via the biosynthetic route the first
synthetic demand was to subdue the reactivity of unsubstituted
quinone double bond in order to reverse the regioselectivity in
the DA reaction of β-myrcene with quinone 11/1. Therefore, in
this context we decided to use a protective DA reaction using
cyclopentadiene (CP) as the protective diene to block the more
reactive unsubstituted quinone double bond which can be
disposed off at later stage after executing the desired DA reaction
on the phenyl substituted double bond of quinone 11/1. To test
the viability of the synthetic tactic as captured in Scheme 5,
initially we chose quinone 11 for the DA reaction with CP to
arrive at the cycloadduct 15 in a highly regio- as well as
stereoselective manner. However, all our efforts to execute the
next DA reaction on 15 with β-myrcene at phenyl substituted
double bond were unfruitful, as the investigated thermal
condition only resulted in swapping of the CP protection with β-
myrcene through a retro DA reaction resulting in expulsion of CP
followed by addition of β-myrcene on the unsubstituted quinone
double bond to offer the cyloadduct 12 which on oxidative
aromatization offered the undesired 13. Also, our efforts to
execute the DA reaction on 15 with β-myrcene under typical
Lewis acid catalyzed condition involving AlCl3 as well as
BF3.OEt2 meet similar fate. Disappointed with the expulsion of
CP under drastic thermal DA reaction conditions as well as under
Lewis acid conditions which were explored for addition of β-
myrcene on the phenyl substituted double bond of quinone 11,
we next thought of replacing CP with anthracene. Indeed, the
reaction of 11 with anthracene was executed in refluxing xylene,
however to arrive at 18 instead of the desired cycloadduct 17.
Also, the structure of 18 was confirmed through its single crystal
X-ray diffraction studies.11 Although 18 was not serviceable in
context of further elaboration of the natural product, we tried the
DA reaction of β-myrcene with 18 but we again failed to arrive at
any cycloadduct. Henceforth, we look forward to explore an
alternative synthetic route to access magterpenoid B.
Acknowledgments
T. K. gratefully acknowledges the financial support from
CSIR, India (Sanction No. 02(0320)/17/EMR-II) as well as
SERB, DST, India (Sanction No. EMR/2014/000826). D.K. is
thankful to UGC, India for the SRF. V.K and A.S. are thankful to
MHRD and CSIR, India respectively for the financial support.
Also, IIT Bhubaneswar is thanked for the financial and
infrastructural support.
References and notes
1.
2.
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission, Pharmacopoeia of the
People's Republic China, China Medical Science Press, Beijing,
China, 2015; vol. 1, pp. 251–252.
(a) Greenberg, M.; Dodds, M.; Tian, M. J. Agric. Food. Chem.
2008, 56, 11151–11156; (b)Tang, S. Y.; Whiteman, M.; Peng, Z.
F.; Jenner, A.; Yong, E. L.; Halliwell, B. Free Radical Bio. Med.
2004, 36, 1575–1587; (c) Zhao, C. & Liu, Z. Q. Biochimie, 2011,
93, 1755–1760; (c) Chao, L. K. et al. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2010,
58, 3472–3428; (d) Kuo, W. L.; Chung, C. Y.; Hwang, T. L.;
Chen, J. J. Phytochemistry 2013, 85, 153–160; (e) Maruyama, Y.,
Kuribara, H., Morita, M., Yuzurihara, M. & Weintraub, S. T. J.
Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 135–138; (f) Watanabe, K. Gendai Toyo
Igaku 1986, 7, 54–59; (g) Liu, Y. et al. Scientific Reports 2013, 3,
3098–3105; (h) Lin, Y. R.; Chen, H. H.; Ko, C. H.; Chan, M. H.
Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 537, 64–69; (i) Jennifer, H.; Ho, C. &
Hong, C. Y. J. Biomed. Sci. 2012, 19, 70–78.
3.
(a) Zhang, B. B.; Wang, H.; Chen, S. Z. J. Chi. Pharm. Sci. 2013,
22, 420–426; (b) Yahara, S.; Nishiyori, T.; Kohda, A.; Nohara, T.;
Nishioka, I. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 2024–2036; (c) Yan, R.
Y.; Liu, H. L.; Zhang, J. Y.; Yang B. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res.
2014, 16, 400–405; (c) Guo, Z. F.; Wang, X.-B.; Luo, J.-G.; Luo,
J.; Wang, J.-S.; Kong, L.-Y. Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 637–641; (d)
Yu, S. X., Yan, R. Y., Liang, R. X., Wang, W. & Yang, B.
Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 356–361.
4.
5.
6.
Greenberg, M., Urnezis, P. & Tian, M. J. Agric. Food Chem.
2007, 55, 9465–9469.
Li, C.; Li, C.-J.; Ma, J.; Chen, F.-Y.; Li, L.; Wang, X.-L.; Ye, F.;
Zhang, D.-M. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3682−3686.
Kumar, D.; Das, O.; Kaurav, M. S.; Khan, T. RSC Advances 2017,
7, 36844–36851.
In summary, we have successfully demonstrated the
implementation of the biomimetic DA approach for the first total
synthesis of magterpenoid C from cheap and readily accessible
starting material. As extension of similar approach for synthesis