Desymmetrizing Heck Cyclizations
A R T I C L E S
Lewis acidic cations. To test for this, we chose LiBF4 as the
source of the Lewis acid since large quantities are soluble in
THF; therefore, Heck cyclizations (E,E)-9 f (R,E,E)-13 were
conducted in homogeneous THF solution using Et3N as the base
(reference reaction: 84% ee and 70% yield at 60 °C). In a series
of experiments with variable equivalents of LiBF4 (based on
cyclization precursor (E,E)-9), a distinct effect on the level of
enantioselection was found (Figure 2). The enantiomeric excess
(∼80% ee) remained nearly unchanged in the presence of 1.0-
2.5 equiv of LiBF4; at higher concentrations of Lewis acidic
lithium cations (3.0-5.0 equiv), the enantiomeric excess (∼20%
ee) collapsed. Conversely, KBF4 (1.0-5.0 equiv) had no effect
whatsoever on the stereochemical outcome of this transformation
(∼85% ee). These results imply that, at high lithium(I)
concentrations, the Lewis basic sites at oxygen are not available
for palladium(II) coordination. Less Lewis-acidic potassium(I)
is not capable of coordinatively saturating the oxygen donor.
Figure 2. Desymmetrizing Heck cyclization of (E,E)-9 in the presence of
variable amounts of Lewis acid. Reaction conditions: (E,E)-9, Pd(OAc)2,
(R)-BINAP, LiBF4 or KBF4, Et3N, THF, 60 °C.
2.1.2. Control Experiment II. Influence of the Counter-
anion. Cationic versus Neutral Pathway. In a vast oversim-
plification, there are two mechanistic scenarios commonly
presumed to govern Heck reactions.19 These, termed cationic
and neutral pathways, refer to the formal charge at palladium-
(II) after oxidative addition/alkene coordination prior to migra-
tory insertion and are dependent on the counteranions present.
The nature of the counteranion determines the reaction path-
way:19 weakly or noncoordinating anions such as the triflate
anion will dissociate, thereby creating a vacant coordination site
at palladium(II) (cationic pathway). On the other hand, strongly
coordinating anions such as halides will remain coordinated at
palladium(II) throughout the catalytic cycle (neutral pathway).
As verified in several asymmetric Heck reactions using bidentate
ligands, this has strong implications on the enantioselectivity-
controlling alkene capture/migratory insertion process.7,20 The
latter is believed not to proceed through a pentacoordinate
alkene-palladium(II) complex.21
The desymmetrizing Heck cyclization of aryl triflate (E,E)-9
(and (E,E)-11) should proceed by the cationic pathway. Con-
sequently, oxidative addition followed by dissociation provides
a vacant Lewis acidic site at palladium(II) capable of coordinat-
ing a proximal Lewis basic oxygen donor. Starting from the
corresponding aryl bromide (E,E)-7, a neutral pathway should
be followed. On the basis of these considerations, we predicted
poor enantiocontrol for the cyclization of (E,E)-7, yet the first
experiment in this survey seemed to show the opposite (Table
2, entry 1). A closer look revealed, though, that (R,E,E)-13 was
formed with 86% ee at 5% yield which, in turn, corresponded
to a single turnover using 5.0 mol % Pd(OAc)2. At higher
temperature, conversion was raised and enantiomeric excesses
decreased to almost zero (Table 2, entries 2 and 3). From these
experiments, we concluded that stereoinduction is dependent
on bromide concentration, which gradually increases with
conversion.
was isolated in poor yield and with completely eroded enan-
tiomeric excess (Table 1, entry 4)!
This pronounced effect indicated that a suitably located
oxygen donor in the cyclization precursor might be decisive
for enantiocontrol. Aware of the precedent of a hydroxy-directed
Heck reaction,16-18 we suspected that the hydroxy group in
(E,E)-9 might interact with the palladium(II) center during the
catalytic cycle. Steric demand as well as attenuated Lewis
basicity of the oxygen donor in (E,E)-10 might account for our
experimental finding.
This hypothesis was then substantiated by an extensive survey
of the enantioselective desymmetrization of the corresponding
methyl ether (E,E)-11 (Table 1, entries 5-11). Cyclization of
(E,E)-11 under the initial reaction conditions cleanly provided
(R,E,E)-15 with an enantiomeric excess (Table 1, entry 5), which
compared well with the data obtained from the cyclization of
(E,E)-9 (Table 1, entry 1). As anticipated, the decomposition-
free ring closure of (E,E)-11 was now possible at remarkably
low temperatures; enantiomeric excesses of 92% ee at 50 °C
and 96% ee at 35 °C were high, yet chemical yields were
moderate (Table 1, entries 6-7). Importantly, substantially
higher yields and again improved enantioselectivities were
obtained by exchanging K2CO3 for TMP (Table 1, entries
8-11), a base that had been less efficient in the cyclization of
(E,E)-9 (Table 1, entry 3). Under optimized reaction conditions,
(E,E)-11 was cyclized in 98% yield and 97% ee (Table 1, entry
10).
With strong evidence for a pivotal role of oxygen in the Heck
reaction, we performed the Heck cyclization of deoxygenated
(E,E)-12 under conditions identical to those for (E,E)-9 and
(E,E)-11. In agreement with our proposal, less reactive cycliza-
tion precursor (E,E)-12 gave tetralin (S*,E,E)-16 in almost
racemic form (Table 1, entries 12 and 13).
2.1.1. Control Experiment I. Influence of Excess Lewis
Acidic Cations. We reasoned that the proposed coordination
of the oxygen donor, -OH or -OMe, to weakly Lewis acidic
palladium(II) might be severely disturbed by addition of external
(19) Cabri, W.; Candiani, I. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 2-7.
(20) (a) Ashimori, A.; Bachand, B.; Overman, L. E.; Poon, D. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 6477-6487. (b) Ashimori, A.; Bachand, B.; Calter, M.
A.; Govek, S. P.; Overman, L. E.; Poon, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 6488-6499.
(16) Kao, L.-C.; Stakem, F. G.; Batel, B. A.; Heck, R. F. J. Org. Chem. 1982,
47, 1267-1277.
(21) (a) Thorn, D. L.; Hoffmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2079-2090.
(b) Samsel, E. G.; Norton, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5505-
5012. (c) Goossen, L. J.; Koley, D.; Hermann, H., Thiel, W. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 2141-2143 (d) Goossen, L. J.; Koley, D.; Hermann, H.;
Thiel, W. Organometallics 2005, 24, 2398-2410. (e) Goossen, L. J.; Koley,
D.; Hermann, H.; Thiel, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11102-11114.
(17) Bernocchi, E.; Cacchi, S.; Ciattini, P. G.; Morera, E.; Ortar, G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1992, 33, 3073-3076.
(18) Kang, S.-K.; Jung, K.-Y.; Park, C.-H.; Namkoong, E.-Y.; Kim, T.-H.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6287-6290.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 44, 2007 13457