C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
NMR data (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the
Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
(
1) (a) Cram, D. J. Science 1983, 219, 1177-1183. (b) Dalcanale, E.; Soncini,
P.; Bacchilega, G.; Ugozzoli, F. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1989,
5
00-502. (c) Soncini, P.; Bonsignore, S.; Dalcanale, E.; Ugozzoli, F. J.
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4608-4612.
(2) (a) Atwood, J. L.; Szumna, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10646-
1
0647. (b) Ballester, P.; Shivanyuk, A.; Far, A. R.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14014-14016.
(3) See, for example, (a) Casnati, A.; Jacopozzi, P.; Pochini, A.; Ugozzoli,
F.; Cacciapaglia, R.; Mandolini, L.; Ungaro, R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
5
91-598. (b) Lehn, J.-M.; Meric, R.; Vingeron, J. P.; Cesario, M.;
Figure 2. 1H NMR study of the inclusion complex PNPCC@Zn-1 (600
MHz, CD2Cl2, 300 K). (a) Guest-free cavitand Zn-1. (b) Inclusion complex
PNPCC@Zn-1 with 1 equiv of PNPCC. (c) Same as (b) with 2.4 equiv of
PNPCC (encapsulated PNPCC signals in red and free PNPCC signals in
blue).
Guilheim, J.; Pascard, C.; Asfari, Z.; Vicens, J. Supramol. Chem. 1995,
5, 97. (c) Schneider, H.-J.; Schneider, U. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 1613-
1615. (d) Murayama, K.; Aoki, K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1997,
119-120. (e) Sarri, P.; Venturi, F.; Cuda, F.; Roelens, S. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 3654-3661. (f) Kubik, S.; Goddard, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 311-322. (g) Roberts, S. L.; Furlan, R. L. E.; Cousins, G. R. L.;
Sanders, J. K. M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2002, 938-939.
4) Cuevas, F.; Di Stefano, S.; Magrans, J. O.; Prados, P.; Mandolini, L.; de
Mendoza, J. Chemistry 2000, 6, 3228-3234.
(
as a catalyst is actually slower than the reaction performed with
Zn-2. The cavitand Zn-1 has no affinity for 3 and only the outer
face of the salen ligand seems to be accessible to the substrate.
Accordingly, the reaction of 3 with Zn-2 is approximately twice
as fast as that of 3 with Zn-1. (See Supporting Information.)
The reaction is slow enough without buffer at millimolar
concentrations that the formation of the PNPCC@Zn-1 complex
(5) Gissot, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7424-7425.
(
6) For reviews, see: (a) Jacobsen, E. N.; Wu, M. H. In ComprehensiVe
Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.;
Springer: New York, 1999; Chapter 18.2, pp 649-677. (b) Katsuki, T.
In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Ojima, I., Ed.; Wiley-VCH:
New York, 2000; Chapter 6B, pp 287-325. (c) Krause, N.; Hoffmann-
R o¨ der, A. Synthesis 2001, 171-186.
(7) (a) Renslo, A. R.; Rebek, J., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3281-
3
283. (b) Tucci, F. C.; Renslo, A. R.; Rudkevich, D. M.; Rebek, J., Jr.
1
13
can be observed by H NMR spectroscopy (Figure 2). The PNPCC
signals are shifted upfield, and separate sets of signals for the free
and bound host appear. When more than 1 equivalent of PNPCC
is present, the free guest signals are observed (Figure 2c). When 1
equiv of PNPCC is used, no free guest can be detected (Figure
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1076-1079.
(8) Morris, G. A.; Zhou, H.; Stern, C. L.; Nguyen, S. T. Inorg. Chem. 2001,
40, 3222-3227.
(9) Moran, J. R.; Karbach, S.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
5826-5828.
(
10) Rudkevich, D. M.; Hilmersson, G.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
41, 9911-9912.
2
b), indicating a high affinity of acetylcholine derivatives for the
(11) (a) Dougherty, D. A. Science 1996, 271, 163-168. (b) Ma, J. C.;
Dougherty, D. A. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 1303-1324 and references therein.
14
host Zn-1. In Figure 2c, it is also possible to observe the formation
of the choline@Zn-1 complex, due to the hydrolysis of the PNPCC.
Nevertheless, the choline produced in the course of the reaction
seems to be a weak inhibitor, and at the micromolar concentrations
(
c) Schneider, H.-J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1417-1436
and references therein. (d) Re, S.; Nagase, S. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 2004, 658-659.
(
(
2 2
12) Fischer Scientific’s CH Cl UN1593 HPLC-GC/MS grade.
13) See Supporting Information for kinetic curves, ln[PNPCC] vs time plots,
15
1
used in the kinetic experiments guest dissociation is facile.
control experiments, and the H NMR study.
1
(
14) It is not possible to detect free acetylcholine or free choline by H NMR
The present system resembles another case in which a reaction
inside a cyclophane with one closed end and a well-positioned
functional group at the other offers unusual reactivity. Catalysis
when 1 equiv of guest is used. The binding of choline derivatives in related
4
-1
a
deep cavitands show K ’s of >10 M .
(
15) No exchange rate constants are available with the PNPCC due to the
hydrolysis of this guest by the cavitand Zn-1 on the time needed for 2D
NOESY acquisition.
1
6
based on molecular recognition with functionalized crown ethers,
17
18
19
(16) (a) Cram, D. J.; Sogah, G. D. Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981,
25-628. (b) Lehn, J.-M.; Ball, P. In The New Chemistry; Hall, N., Ed.;
Cambridge University Press: New York, 2000; Chapter 12, pp 300-
51.
cyclodextrins, cyclophanes, and other open ended or open
sided20 synthetic receptors is well-known. Rarely do these cases
fix the reactive site of the substrate, and even more rarely do they
properly position the catalyst’s functional group. When both are
present, these features appear optimal for catalysis. The exclusion
of bulk solvent can also play a role. We intend to test these notions
on more difficult reactions with these functionalized cavitands.
6
3
(
17) (a) Breslow, R.; Schmuck, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6601-6605.
(b) Yang, J.; Gabriele, B.; Belvedere, S.; Huang, Y.; Breslow, R. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 5057-5067. For “capped” versions, see: (c) Yuan, D.-
Q.; Koga, K.; Fujita, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 7593-7596. (d)
Engeldinger, E.; Poorters, L.; Armspach, D.; Matt, D.; Toupet, L. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 634-635 and references therein.
(
18) (a) Mattei, P.; Diederich, F. HelV. Chim. Acta 1997, 80, 1555-1588. (b)
Habicher, T.; Diederich, F.; Gramlich, V. HelV. Chim. Acta 1999, 82,
Acknowledgment. We are grateful to the Skaggs Foundation
and the National Institutes of Health (GM 27932) for financial
support and B. Purse for experimental assistance. S.R. is a Lavoisier
Postdoctoral Fellow of the Minist e` re des Affaires Etrang e` res de
France.
1066-1095.
(19) (a) Tecilla, P.; Chang, S. K.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
1
12, 9586-9590. (b) Chen, J.; Korner, S.; Craig, S. L.; Rudkevich, D.
M.; Rebek, J., Jr. Nature 2002, 415, 385-386.
(20) (a) Magrans, J. O.; Ortiz, A. R.; Molins, M. A.; Lebouille, P. H. P.;
Sanchez-Quesada, J.; Prados, P.; Pons, M.; Gago, F.; de Mendoza, J.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1712-1715. (b) Wolfe, J.; Nemeth,
D.; Costero, A.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 983-984.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, full
synthetic procedures, characterization of new compounds, kinetic, and
JA045167X
J. AM. CHEM. SOC.
9
VOL. 126, NO. 50, 2004 16281