COMMUNICATIONS
chromatography on silica gel (CH2Cl2 as eluant) gave a cis/trans mixture of
4-phenyl-1-cyclohexanol (159 mg, 0.91 mmol, 91% yield; cis:trans
23:77).
The Family Approach to the Resolution of
Racemates **
Ton Vries,* Hans Wynberg,* Erik van Echten,
Jan Koek, Wolter ten Hoeve, Richard M. Kellogg,
Quirinus B. Broxterman,* Adri Minnaard, Bernard
Kaptein, Sietse van der Sluis,* Lumbertus Hulshof, and
Jaap Kooistra
Received: March 31, 1998 [Z11667IE]
German version: Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2524 ± 2526
Keywords: aluminum ´ asymmetric synthesis ´ homogene-
ous catalysis ´ oxidations ´ reductions
A cornerstone of stereochemistry is the resolution of
tartaric acid by Louis Pasteur.[1, 2] This conversion of a
racemate with a chiral resolving agent and subsequent
separation of the mixture of diastereomers formed is known
as the ªclassical method of resolutionº,[3] and remains, 150
years after Pasteur, a paradigm of trial and error.[4] Despite
many attempts,[3] neither computer-assisted modeling,[5] de-
tailed examination of the crystal structure data of diastereo-
meric salts,[6] study of the energy differences of diastereomeric
salts,[7] nor empirical correlations[8] have led to a hypothesis,
let alone a theory, on which to base a predictable resolution
technique.
All too aware of these problems on the basis of long ex-
perience and motivated by a need to develop fast and reliable
protocols, we considered the combinatorial approach, a recent
technique that has shown promise in the search for lead com-
pounds in drug design.[9] A rudimentary application of such
methodology led to the remarkable results reported here.
The standard technique for the resolution of a racemate
entails the addition of one chiral resolving agent to a racemate
followed by a suitable waiting period in order to observe
crystallization of one diastereomeric salt. We hoped that the
simultaneous addition of several resolving agents might
shorten the time required for the hit-and-miss method of
finding a resolving agent. The addition of more than one
resolving agent could result in the precipitation of the least
soluble diastereomeric salt, thus obviating the need for
repetition of the process of resolution with one resolving
agent at a time. To our great surprise, the simultaneous
addition of more than one member of a ªfamilyº of resolving
agents (for a definition, see below) to a solution of a racemate
usually causes very rapid precipitation of a crystalline
diastereomeric salt in good to high enantiomeric purity and
yield. The results from some of the more than two hundred
successful experiments carried out during the past year[10] are
listed in Tables 1 and 2. In virtually all cases examined both
the yields and enantiomeric excesses (ee) were superior to
those obtained by the classical approach (compare entry 55
with entry 53).
[1] H. Meerwein, R. Schmidt, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1925, 444, 221.
[2] a) A. Verley, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1925, 37, 537; b) A. Verley, Bull. Soc.
Chim. Fr. 1925, 37, 1871; c) A. Verley, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1927, 41, 788.
[3] W. Ponndorf, Angew. Chem. 1926, 39, 138.
[4] Reviews: a) A. L. Wilds, Org. React. 1944, 2, 178; b) R. M. Kellogg in
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol.
8 (Eds.: B. M. Trost, I.
Fleming), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, p. 88.
[5] C. De Graauw, J. Peters, H. Van Bekkum, J. Huskens, Synthesis 1994,
1007.
[6] W. Tischtschenko, Chem. Zentralbl. 1906, 77, 1309.
[7] a) H. Kagan, J. Namy, Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 6573; b) J. Huskens, C.
De Graauw, J. Peters, H. Van Bekkum, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas
1994, 1007.
[8] D. Barbry, S. Torchy, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2959.
[9] a) K. G. Akamanchi, N. R. Varalakshmy, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
3571; b) K. G. Akamanchi, N. R. Varalakshmy, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 5085; c) K. G. Akamanchi, N. R. Varalakshmy, B. A. Chaudhari,
Synlett 1997, 371.
[10] a) T. Ooi, M. Takahashi, K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
11307; b) T. Ooi, E. Tayama, M. Takahashi, K. Maruoka, Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 7403; c) T. Ooi, A. Saito, K. Maruoka, Tetrahedron Lett.,
in press.
[11] The reduction of benzaldehyde with Al(OiPr)3 (1 equiv) in 2-propanol
did not proceed at room temperature.
[12] Our system surely takes advantage of the lower susceptibility of both
acetone and acetophenone toward the MPV reduction with the
reduction products as a hydride source. Indeed, attempted reaction of
acetone with 4-phenylcyclohexanol (1 equiv) in the presence of 1
(5 mol%) in CH2Cl2 at room temperature for 1 h gave rise to 4-
phenylcyclohexanone in only 8% yield.
[13] J. D. Morrison, H. S. Mosher, Asymmetric Organic Reactions, Amer-
ican Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1976, p. 160. Evans et al.
reported the first catalytic and highly enantioselective MPV reduction
with a chiral Sm complex: D. A. Evans, S. G. Nelson, M. R. Gagne,
A. R. Muci, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9800.
[14] The enantiomeric excess of 7 was determined by comparison of the
optical rotation with that of commercially available 7 (98% ee). In the
reaction with (R)-()-sec-o-bromophenethyl alcohol the ee value was
measured after conversion into the corresponding styrene oxide: H. C.
Kolb, K. B. Sharpless, Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 10515.
[15] Unfortunately, the asymmetric MPV reduction of dialkyl ketones
gave unsatisfactory results in terms of reactivity and selectivity. For
example, reaction of 2-undecanone under similar conditions with (R)-
()-sec-o-bromophenethyl alcohol afforded 2-undecanol in 11% yield
with less than 25% ee.
[16] R. V. Oppenauer, Recl. Trav. Chim. 1937, 56, 137.
[17] For a recent modification, see K. G. Akamanchi, B. A. Chaudhari,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6925.
[18] Commercially available cholesterol was further dried according to the
literature procedure: J. F. Eastham, R. Teranishi, Org. Synth. Coll. Vol.
1963, 4, 192.
[*] Dr. T. Vries, Prof. Dr. H. Wynberg, E. van Echten, J. Koek,
Dr. W. ten Hoeve, Prof. Dr. R. M. Kellogg
Syncom BV
Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen (The Netherlands)
Fax: (31)50-363-4875
Dr. Q. B. Broxterman, Dr. A. J. Minnaard, Dr. B. Kaptein
Organic Chemistry & Biotechnology Section, DSM Research
P.O. Box 18, 6160 MO Geleen (The Netherlands)
Dr. S. van der Sluis, Prof. Dr. L. Hulshof, Dr. J. Kooistra
P.O. Box 81, 5900 AB Venlo (The Netherlands)
[**] Dr. Ton Vries is the discoverer of this new method.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, No. 17
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 1998
1433-7851/98/3717-2349 $ 17.50+.50/0
2349