Organic Process Research & Development 2004, 8, 372−375
The Transesterification of Dimethyl Carbonate with Phenol over
Mg-Al-hydrotalcite Catalyst
Mei Fuming, Pei Zhi, and Li Guangxing*
Department of Chemistry, Huazhong UniVersity of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, P.R. China
4
Abstract:
Tundo et al. reported that the equilibrium constant for
-
4
The production of diphenyl carbonate (DPC) by the transes-
terification of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) with phenol was
performed using a variety of solid catalysts. Mg-Al-hydrotalcite
was found to have a high activity for this transesterification. A
eq 1 was 3 × 10 at 180 °C. This indicates that the
transesterification reactions are thermodynamically unfavor-
able, while the O-methylation reaction is thermodynamically
favorable due to the production of gaseous CO
2
. To overcome
1
4.7% yield of DPC and an 11.6% yield of methylphenyl
the thermodynamic limitation of the transesterification reac-
5-12
carbonate (MPC) based on DMC were obtained in the presence
of Mg-Al-hydrotalcite catalyst. The optimum experimental
temperature for this transesterification reaction was between
tions, many processes have been proposed.
Catalysts are
also very important for transesterification reactions. Tradi-
tionally, the homogeneous catalysts for the transesterification
of DMC with phenol are Sn, Ti, Al, and Fe organometallic
1
60 and 180 °C, which was in agreement with the thermody-
1
3-16
namic analysis. When the transesterification of DMC with
phenol was performed at the molar ratio of phenol to DMC of
compounds,
the heterogeneous catalysts are mainly Mo,
1
7-20
Ti, Si, and rare earth metal oxides.
The homogeneous
2
:1, reaction time 10 h, 1.0% of 2:1 Mg-Al-hydrotalcite based
catalysts are unstable and are not easy to separate from the
products in this reaction system. The heterogeneous catalysts
have low catalytic activities and selectivities. We have found
that samarium trifluoromethanesulfonate is an efficient
heterogeneous catalyst for the transesterification of DMC
with phenol, but it is expensive in commercial application.
Therefore, it is desirable to find more efficient and cheap
catalysts for transesterification of DMC with phenol in the
application of commercial production.
on the total weight of reactants, and 160-180 °C, the total yield
and selectivity for DPC and MPC were 26.3 and 82.4%,
respectively. The yield of anisole was 5.6%.
21
1
. Introduction
Transesterification is an important organic transformation
and provides essential synthons for a number of applications
in organic processes. The synthesis of aromatic carbonates
Hydrotalcite-like compounds (HTLCs) consist of brucite-
like layers with positively charged metal oxide or hydroxide
layers with anions located interstitially. HTLCs catalyze
many organic reactions, such as the aldol and Knoevenagel
1
from dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and phenols is one of the
most important tranesterification reactions. It is thought to
be the most effective method now, because DMC is
achieving increasing importance and interest in the chemical
industry, mainly for its versatility as both reagent and solvent
and its nontoxicity for human health and the environment.
Meanwhile, aromatic carbonates, especially diphenyl carbon-
ate (DPC), are precursors for the production of aromatic
2
2,23
24
condensations,
Michael reactions, cyanoethylation of
25
26
27
alcohols and nitroaldol reactions. Watanabe and Tatsumi
found that hydrotalcite-type materials as base catalysts were
2
(
4) Tundo, P.; Trotta, F.; Moraglio, G.; Ligorati, F. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988,
7, 1565-1571.
5) Nishihira, K.; Tanaka, H.; Yoshida, S. JP 07101908, 1995.
2
(
polycarbonates by the melt polymerization process which is
(6) Inaba, M.; Kohei, S.; Tanaka, T. JP 08188558, 1996.
(7) Murata, K.; Kawahashi, K.; Watabiki, M. EP 591923, 1994.
now the highlight in the polycarbonate industry.3
(8) Inaba, M.; Sawa, K.; Tanaka, T. JP 0959225, 1997.
The reactions of DMC with phenol involved in the
transesterification reactions are shown in eqs 1-3, and the
O-methylation reaction is showed in eq 4:
(9) Harrison, G. E.; Dennis, A. J. WO 18458, 1992.
10) Fukuoka, S.; Tojo, M.; Kawamura, M. JP 04235951, 1992.
11) Kawamura, K. JP 07330687, 1995.
12) Inaba, M.; Hasegawa, K.; Sawa, K. JP 0940616, 1997.
13) Inaba, M.; Sawa, K.; Tanaka, T. JP 09110805, 1997.
14) Idemitsu Kosan Co. Ltd. JP 09169703, 1997.
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
15) Tatsuya, N. JP 0407035, 1992.
16) Nobuo, F.; Fumio, O.; Tetsuo, I.; Takahito, F. JP 08239347, 1996.
17) Zihua, F.; Yoshio, O. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1997, 118, 293-299.
18) Kim, W. B.; Lee, J. S. J. Catal. 1999, 185, 307-313.
19) Hideaki, T.; Masaru, K.; Kenichi, W.; Yoshiyuki, O. WO 9517371, 1995.
20) Terunobu, Y.; Takashi, Y. JP 0959223, 1997.
21) Mei, F.; Li, G.; Nie, J.; Xu, H. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2002, 184, 465-
468.
(22) Rao, K. K.; Gravelle, M.; Valente, J. S.; Figueras, F. J. Catal. 1998, 173,
115-121.
(23) Kantam, M. L.; Choudary, B. M.; Reddy, C. V.; Rao, K. K.; Figueras, F.
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: ligxabc@public.wh.hb.cn.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1998, 439, 1033-1034.
(24) Choudary, B. M.; Kantam, M. L.; Reddy, C. V.; Rao, K. K.; Figueras, F.
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 146, 279-284.
(25) Krumbhar, P. S.; Valente, J. S.; Figueras, F. J. Chem Soc., Chem. Commun.
1998, 39, 1091-1092.
(
(
(
1) Otera, J. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 1449-1470.
2) Shaikh Abbs-Alli, G.; Sivaram, S. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 951-975.
3) Delledonne, D.; Rivetti, F.; Romano, U. Appl. Catal., A 2001, 221, 241-
2
51.
3
72
•
Vol. 8, No. 3, 2004 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op0302098 CCC: $27.50 © 2004 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/17/2004