C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
complexes, which is proposed as a critical step in the NOR catalytic
cycle.1 It is remarkable that this N-N bond is easily cleaved by
oxidation and regenerated again by reduction. Interestingly, trans-
formation of the N-N coupled complexes into the oxo-bridged
dinuclear complexes with the evolution of N2O was observed. This
observation would provide significant information regarding the
mechanism of NO reduction to N2O by NOR. Studies to find the
optimized reaction conditions for generation of the oxo-bridged
complexes and evolution of the N2O gas and also to complete the
NO reduction cycle like NOR are currently underway.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of 5b, H-atoms are not shown. CHCl3 solvent
molecules in the structure of 5b are omitted.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (No. 19028053, “Chem-
istry of Concerto Catalysis”) and Young Scientists (B) (No.
18750050) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology, Japan. We thank Prof. K. Tatsumi and Dr. Y.
Ohki (Nagoya University) and also Prof. R. E. Cramer (Hawaii
University) for their useful discussions on the X-ray analyses of
2b and 2c.
Scheme 2
Supporting Information Available: Full experimental and spec-
troscopic details for all new compounds, ORTEP drawing of 2b,
depiction of HOMO for the calculated complex 2c, cyclic voltammetry
diagram of 2a, and X-ray structural data for complexes 2b, 2c, 4a, and
5b (PDF and CIF). This material is available free of charge via the
References
band appears at 1930 cm-1, which is comparable to that of 1. The
(1) (a) Wasser, I. M.; de Vries, S.; Moe¨nne-Loccoz, P.; Schro¨der, I.; Karlin,
K. D. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1201-1234. (b) Lee, D.-H.; Mondal, B.;
Karlin, K. D. Nitrogen Monooxide and Nitrous Oxide Binding and
Reduction. In ActiVation of Small Molecules; Tolman, W. B., Ed.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; pp 43-79. (c) Averill, B. A. Chem.
ReV. 1996, 96, 2951-2964. (d) Girsch, P.; de Vries, S. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 1997, 1318, 202-216. (e) Moe¨nne-Loccoz, P.; de Vries, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5147-5152. (f) Moe¨nne-Loccoz, P.; Richter, O.-
M. H.; Huang, H.-W.; Wasser, I. M.; Ghiladi, R. A.; Karlin, K. D.; de
Vries, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9344-9345. (g) Pinakoulaki, E.;
Gemeinhardt, S.; Saraste, M.; Varotsis, C. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277,
23407-23413. (h) Collman, J. P.; Yan, Y.-L.; Lei, J.; Dinolfo, P. H. Inorg.
Chem. 2006, 45, 7581-7583.
(2) (a) Arikawa, Y.; Nishimura, Y.; Kawano, H.; Onishi, M. Organometallics
2003, 22, 3354-3356. (b) Arikawa, Y.; Nishimura, Y.; Ikeda, K.; Onishi,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3706-3707. (c) Nishimura, Y.; Arikawa,
Y.; Inoue, T.; Onishi, M. Dalton Trans. 2005, 930-937. (d) Arikawa,
Y.; Asayama, T.; Onishi, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 194-200.
(e) Arikawa, Y.; Ikeda, K.; Asayama, T.; Nishimura, Y.; Onishi, M.
Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13, 4024-4036.
(3) (a) Lipscomb, W. N. J. Chem. Phys. 1971, 54, 3659-3660. (b) Lipscomb,
W. N.; Wang, F. E. Acta Cryst. 1961, 14, 1100-1101. (c) Dulmage, W.
J.; Meyers, E. A.; Lipscomb, W. N. Acta Cryst. 1953, 6, 760-764.
(4) (a) Feig, A. L.; Bautista, M. T.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35,
6892-6898. (b) Ju, T. D.; Woods, A. S.; Cotter, R. J.; Moe¨nne-Loccoz,
P.; Karlin, K. D. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 297, 362-372. (c) Wasser, I.
M.; Martens, C. F.; Verani, C. N.; Rentschler, E.; Huang, H.-W.; Moe¨nne-
Loccoz, P.; Zakharov, L. N.; Rheingold, A. L.; Karlin, K. D. Inorg. Chem.
2004, 43, 651-662. (d) Wasser, I. M.; Huang, H.-W.; Moe¨nne-Loccoz,
P.; Karlin, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3310-3320.
(5) Lide, D. R., Ed. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 72nd ed.; CRC
Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1991-1992.
(6) For Ru-complex, see: Bo¨ttcher, H.-C.; Graf, M.; Mereiter, K.; Kirchner,
K. Organometallics 2004, 23, 1269-1273.
(7) The reaction is complicated, and several other uncharacterized complexes
were also produced.
(8) Complex 3a was contaminated by trace amounts of inseparable impurities.
(9) Whitten, D. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 83-90.
(10) Two-electron redox between 2a and 4a was confirmed by their peak
separation between oxidation and reduction waves in the cyclic voltam-
mogram and also by their controlled potential coulometry.
(11) In the protonation reaction of 2a, it seems that protonated species on the
bridging oxygen atom of 5a would be formed, and then removal of the
proton would occur in the step of chromatographic separation to release
5a.
- +
FAB-MS spectra exhibit the signal [4a + BF4
] at m/z 878.1,
and moreover the structure of 4a‚(BF4)2 was X-ray crystallographi-
cally confirmed.
The crystal structure of 4a‚(BF4)2 (Figure 1) verified the presence
of two {TpRu(NO)} units bridged by chloride and pyrazolate,
accompanied by two BF4-. Bonding interaction between two NO
nitrogen atoms is no longer observable as exemplified by N‚‚‚N
separation of 3.006(8) Å. The N-O bond distances are 1.169(9)
and 1.131(8) Å, and expansion of the Ru-N-O angles (169.7(6)
and 165.4(6)°) compared with those of 2b and 2c is evident.
Comparison of 4a‚(BF4)2 with 2b and 2c clearly shows the
shortening of the Ru-NO bond lengths.
Oxidation of 2a induced cleavage of the N-N bond. The
reversibility of this N-N bonding was supported by the cyclic
voltammogram of 2a, which is featured by a reversible two-electron
redox couple at 0.389 V (E1/2 vs Ag/AgCl).10 Actually, reductive
treatment of 4a‚(BF4)2 with Zn cleanly reformed complex 2a (70%
yield).
Isolation of 2 led us to inquire as to whether N2O can be produced
from 2 and then the corresponding oxo-bridged dinuclear complex
can be formed similarly to the proposed mechanism for the NOR
catalytic cycle.1 To check this possibility, we preliminarily examined
the reaction conditions and found that complex 2a was transformed
into the oxo-bridged dinuclear complex (TpRu)2(µ-Cl)(µ-pz)(µ-O)
(5a) (21% yield) besides 4a‚(BF4)2 (43% yield), by treatment with
HBF4‚OEt2 in CH2Cl2 (Scheme 2).11 Concomitantly, the evolution
of N2O was gas-chromatographically detected.12 Unfortunately, the
yields of complex 5a and the evolved N2O gas were relatively low
in these reaction conditions. Complex 5a was characterized by
spectral data (NMR, IR, and EI-MS) and elemental analysis, and
the structure was confirmed by the X-ray diffraction observation
of the bromo derivative 5b (Figure 2).
(12) N2O was detected in 25% yield on the basis of the separated complex 5a;
1
that is, about
/
mole of N2O gas per 1 mole of 5a.
4
In conclusion, we have communicated an example of unprec-
edented N-N coupling of the two nitrosyl ligands on dinuclear
JA0763504
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 46, 2007 14161