ChemComm
Communication
involving one of the cyanophenylene groups, and then it is
relaxed to the S0 state through radiative decay. In this case, the
lifetime of the CT state is controlled by the rate at which the
phenyl group rotates (tunnelling); the higher the rotations
the lower the CT state stability and vice versa. For instance,
dCN and tCN show nearly two times longer fluorescence
lifetime in acetonitrile and DMSO when compared to non-
polar solvent, toluene and ethyl acetate. This feature is
ascribed to the stabilization of the CT state, which sub-
sequently prevents the destabilization process by hindering the
inter-conversion between the charge resonance structures by means
of phenylene rotation. In order to confirm this hypothesis we have
obtained the optimized geometry of the first excited state were one
of the N–C bonds has more double bond character for dCN and tCN
when compared to the ground state (ESI,† Tables S7 and S8). Thus,
based on the above facts we can conclude that although the
quadrupolar and octupolar molecules form the symmetry broken
CT state, the lifetime of the thus formed state is significantly
influenced by the remaining acceptor moieties that are not part of
the CT state.
In summary, the quadrupolar and octupolar molecules with
triphenylamine as donor and cyano group as an acceptor form
an emissive, long-lived, symmetry broken intramolecular
charge transfer state similar to the dipolar molecule. The
radiative rate constant of the CT state becomes highly sensitive
to the number of donor–acceptor pairs. The formation of the
charge transfer state can be manipulated by controlling the
rotational motion of the phenylene moiety.
We thank CSIR-TAPSUN (NWP-54) and the DST-fast track
(FT/CS-150/2011) programme for financial support. PT thanks
DST for INSPIRE fellowship. We thank NCUFP and Dr V.
Subramanian, respectively, for TCSPC and computational
facilities. AS acknowledges the financial support from UGC
(41-215/2012 (SR)) and CSIR (01(2540)/11/EMR-II), India.
Fig. 3 Fluorescence decay profiles of (a) mCN and (b) dCN in different
solvents monitored at their respective emission maximum wavelength.
in DMSO when compared to toluene (ESI,† Table S6). On the other
hand the nonradiative rate constant (Knr) remains almost constant
irrespective of the solvent. Thus, based on the above facts we can
conclude that although dCN and tCN form symmetry broken
dipolar CT state, its lifetime is shorter than that of mCN. Symmetry
broken CT state for quadrupolar and octupolar systems can be
explained, respectively, by two and three, isoenergetic charge
resonance structures. The inter-conversion between the CT states
is driven by the phenyl ring rotation around N–C bond of amine
and phenyl group. Effect of phenylene rotation on the fluorescence
behaviour was probed by increasing the viscosity of the solution
using polystyrene, where higher viscosity is expected to hinder the
N–C bond rotation. It was found, as shown in Fig. 4 that the
fluorescence intensity decreased with increased percentage of
polystyrene (ESI,† Fig. S14). Indeed, up to two fold decreased
fluorescence was noted for mCN, however, that of dCN and tCN
was measured to be B1.4 fold when compared to neat toluene.
This observed feature underscores the importance of phenyl
rotation in the CT state formation.
The schematic electronic energy level diagram of cyanotriphenyl-
amine (tCN) is given in Scheme 1. According to Prof. Painelli’s phase
diagram for quadrupolar and octupolar molecules,14 the cyanotri-
phenylamines belongs to the class I, where the nondipolar ground
state undergoes symmetry breaking at the excited state having two
and three equivalent minima, respectively, for quadrupolar and
octupolar chromophores with equal and opposite dipole moments.
The initial photo-excitation of the TPA derivatives populates the
higher excited state which is then relaxed to form a long-lived CT
state. The CT state formation involves the rotation of the phenyl
ring with the subsequent formation of quinonoid type structure
Notes and references
1 (a) B. E. Hardin, H. J. Snaith and M. D. McGehee, Nat. Photonics,
¨
2012, 6, 162; (b) A. Mishra, M. K. R. Fischer and P. Bauerle, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2474–2499; (c) Z. Ning and H. Tian, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 5483–5495.
2 (a) K. S. Kim, S. B. Noh, T. Katsuda, S. Ito, A. Osuka and D. Kim,
Chem. Commun., 2007, 2479–2481; (b) C. Huang, M. M. Sartin,
N. Siegel, M. Cozzuol, Y. Zhang, J. M. Hales, S. Barlow, J. W. Perry
and S. R. Marder, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 16119–16128.
3 (a) A. P. de Silva, T. S. Moody and G. D. Wright, Analyst, 2009, 134,
2385–2393; (b) Y. Ooyama, A. Matsugasako, K. Oka, T. Nagano,
M. Sumomogi, K. Komaguchi, I. Imae and Y. Harima, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 4448–4450.
4 (a) Y. Shirota, J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 75–93; (b) Z. G. Soos,
S. Mukhopadhyay and S. Ramasesha, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2007, 442,
285–288; (c) S. Mukhopadhyay, B. J. Topham, Z. G. Soos and
S. Ramasesha, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2008, 112, 7271–7279.
5 (a) D. P. Hagberg, J.-H. Yum, H. Lee, F. De Angelis, T. Marinado,
¨
K. M. Karlsson, R. Humphry-Baker, L. Sun, A. Hagfeldt, M. Gratzel
and M. K. Nazeeruddin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6259–6266;
(b) Z. Ning, Q. Zhang, W. Wu, H. Pei, B. Liu and H. Tian, J. Org.
Chem., 2008, 73, 3791–3797.
6 (a) S.-T. Huang, Y.-C. Hsu, Y.-S. Yen, H. H. Chou, J. T. Lin,
C.-W. Chang, C.-P. Hsu, C. Tsai and D.-J. Yin, J. Phys. Chem. C,
2008, 112, 19739–19747; (b) M. Velusamy, K. R. Justin Thomas,
J. T. Lin, Y.-C. Hsu and K.-C. Ho, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 1899–1902.
Fig. 4 Fluorescence spectra of cyanotriphenylamines in toluene (dotted
lines) and in toluene with 9.5% polystyrene (solid lines).
6904 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 6902--6905
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014