S. Haddoum et al. / Catalysis Communications 27 (2012) 141–147
147
high temperatures. Keeping in the mind that ring-enlargement prod-
uct formation was hindered at low temperatures and at low Fe con-
tents, this result represents an advantage of Fe catalysts due to their
ability to hinder aromatization. This also holds true for the samples
with high Fe loadings but at low temperatures.
IDECAT network of excellence and the scientific program TASSILI for
their support.
References
[1] G.A. Somorjai, R.M. Rioux, Catal. Today 100 (2005) 201–215.
[2] I. Fechete, V. Jouikov, Electrochim. Acta 537 (2008) 7107–7110.
[3] D. Kubicka, N. Kumar, P.M. Arvela, M. Tiitta, V. Niemi, H. Karhu, T. Salmi, D.Y.
Murzin, J. Catal. 227 (2004) 313–327.
[4] G.B. McVicker, M. Daage, M.S. Touvelle, C.W. Hudson, D.P. Klein, W.C. Baird Jr., B.R.
Cook, J.G. Chen, S. Hantzer, D.E.W. Vaughan, E.S. Ellis, O.C. Feeley, J. Catal. 210
(2002) 137–148.
[5] L.B. Galperin, J.C. Bricker, J.R. Holmgren, Appl. Catal. A 239 (2003) 297–304.
[6] A. Djeddi, I. Fechete, F. Garin, Catal. Commun. 17 (2012) 173–178.
[7] J.S. Beck, J.C. Vartuli, W.J. Roth, M.E. Leonowicz, C.T. Kresge, K.D. Schmitt, C.T.W.
Chu, D.H. Olson, E.W. Sheppard, S.B. McCullen, J.B. Higgins, J.L. Schlenker, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10834–10843.
4. Conclusions
The conversion of MCP with hydrogen at atmospheric pressure
was selected as an index reaction for Fe-TUD-1. The incorporation of
Fe ions into Fe-TUD-1 mesoporous materials has been evidenced by
various physicochemical methods. For low iron content, Si/Fe ratios
of 85 and 65, the Fe-O-Si bond of the isolated tetrahedral iron ions
in the silica TUD-1 framework is dominantly. For the high iron con-
tent, Si/Fe ratio of 45, the isolated Fe sites of Si-O-Fe bonds coexist
with the Fe-O-Fe clusters.
[8] J.C. Jansen, Z. Shan, L. Marchese, W. Zhou, N. Puil, T. Maschmeyer, Chem.
Commun. (2001) 713–714.
It was observed that the reductive treatment does not cause a no-
ticeable change in the mode of iron-ion stabilization in the TUD-1
framework, in this case no partial or total breaking of the Si\O\Fe
framework linkages take place (UV–vis spectroscopy). We observed
that for all the samples, the isolated atoms are very difficult to reduce
toward Fe0. Even the transfer of one electron (Fe3+ to Fe2+) was not
easy to prove (XPS-spectroscopy).
[9] T. Vralstad, G. Øye, M. Stocker, J. Sjoblom, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 104
(2006) 10–17.
[10] Y. Li, Z. Feng, Y. Lian, K. Sun, L. Zhang, G. Jia, Q. Yang, C. Li, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 84 (2005) 41–49.
[11] I. Fechete, B. Donnio, O. Ersen, T. Dintzer, A. Djeddi, F. Garin, Appl. Surf. Sci. 257
(2011) 2791–2800.
[12] A. Boulaoued, I. Fechete, B. Donnio, M. Bernard, P. Turek, F. Garin, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 155 (2012) 131–142.
[13] N. Novak Tusar, A. Ristic, S. Cecowski, I. Arcon, K. Lazar, H. Amenitsch, V. Kaucica,
Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 104 (2007) 289–295.
The catalytic studies indicate that Fe-TUD-1 with various Si/Fe
ratios exhibited outstanding ring-opening selectivity. Among the
ring-opening products, n-H was formed exclusively. The formation of
n-H has been explained by the presence of metallocyclobutane intermedi-
ate, followed by the endocyclic C\C bond rupture of the MCP ring which
leads to the formation of a carbene-olefin, and giving a π-adsorbed vinyl
group via a 1,2 hydride shift. The active sites responsible for the
endocyclic C\C bond rupture between substituted secondary-tertiary
carbon atoms seem to be the tetrahedrally coordinated/atomically isolat-
ed sites on the mesoporous support, while the small clusters seems to be
responsible for the successive C\C bond rupture. The selectivity toward
the cracking reaction is generally explained by the difficulty in desorbing
products formed on the catalyst surface. The results show that one atom
of the Fe\O\Si species may react in the MCP conversion, favoring the
single C\C rupture and increasing the selectivity to ring opening of
MCP. On these Fe isolated species and tetrahedrally coordinated the Fe
carbide cannot be formed. In contrast, two atoms of Fe\O\Fe species
may react in the conversion of MCP, favoring the consecutive reactions
and decreasing the selectivity of the ring opening of MCP. On these spe-
cies the Fe carbide has been formed.
[14] M.S. Hamdy, G. Mul, J.C. Jansen, A. Ebaid, Z. Shan, A.R. Overweg, Th. Maschmeyer,
Catal. Today 100 (2005) 255–260.
[15] A. Gervasini, C. Messi, P. Carniti, A. Ponti, N. Ravasio, F. Zaccheria, J. Catal. 262
(2009) 224–234.
[16] I. Fechete, E. Gautron, E. Dumitriu, D. Lutic, P. Caullet, H. Kessler, Rev. Roum. Chim.
53 (2008) 49–54.
[17] R. Szostak, Molecular Sieves: Principles of Synthesis and Identification, Van
Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989.
[18] C. Aquino, T. Maschmeyer, In: in: V. Valtchev, S. Mintova, M. Tsapsatis (Eds.),
Ordered Porous Solids: Recent Advances and Prospects, Elsevier Science, 2009,
pp. 3–30.
[19] A. Ramanathan, D. Klomp, J.A. Peters, U. Hanfeld, J. Mol. Catal. A 260 (2006)
62–69.
[20] S. Brunauer, L.S. Deming, E. Deming, E. Teller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62 (1940)
1723–1732.
[21] Z. Shan, E. Gianotti, J.C. Jansen, J.A. Peters, L. Marchese, T. Maschmeyer, Chem. Eur.
J. 7 (2001) 1437–1443.
[22] M.S. Kumar, M. Schwidder, W. Grunert, A. Bruckner, J. Catal. 227 (2004) 384–397.
[23] J.W. Park, H. Chon, J. Catal. 133 (1992) 159–169.
[24] J. Perez-Ramirez, F. Kapteijn, A. Bruckner, J. Catal. 218 (2003) 234–238.
[25] J. Perez-Ramirez, M. Suthosh, A. Bruckner, J. Catal. 223 (2004) 13–27.
[26] B.M. Weckhuysen, D. Wang, M.P. Rosynek, J.H. Lunsford, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 36
(1997) 2374–2376.
[27] H.-Y. Chen, W.M.H. Sachtler, Catal. Today 42 (1998) 73–83.
[28] Z. Paal, P. Tétényi, Nature 267 (1977) 234–236.
[29] F.G. Gault, Adv. Catal. 30 (1981) 1–95.
Although the conversion of MCP is relatively low as compared with
noble metal catalysts [28–30], these empirical results in reductive
media for Fe-TUD-1 catalysts are appropriate for generating ring open-
ing products at the secondary C–tertiary C with atom efficiency.
[30] S. Dokjampa, T. Rirksomboon, Do.T.M. Phuong, D.E. Resasco, J. Molec. Catal.A 274
(2007) 231–240.
[31] Y. Miki, S. Yamadaya, M. Oba, J. Catal. 49 (1977) 278–284.
[32] S. Alayoglu, C. Aliaga, C. Sprung, G.A. Somorjai, Catal. Lett. 141 (2011) 914–924.
[33] F. Garin, F. Gault, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97 (1975) 4466–4476.
[34] F. Garin, F.G. Gault, In: in: R. Prins, G.C.A. Schuit (Eds.), Chemistry and Chemical
Engineering of Catalytic Processes, Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn,
The Netherlands Germantown, Maryland, USA, 1980, pp. 351–380.
[35] R. Touroude, F.G. Gault, J. Catal. 32 (1974) 288–293.
Acknowledgments
Financial support by the CNRS France is gratefully acknowledged by
Ioana Fechete. We are pleased to acknowledge the REALISE network, the