A direct comparison was made between Stryker’s reagent
and (BDP)CuH using isophorone, a particularly challenging
test case given both â,â-disubstitution and the geminal
methyl groups at C-5 (Scheme 2). While SR used at a S/L
slowly than enones (compare entry 3 vs 8), although an
unhindered acrylate (entry 7) gave the corresponding ester
within 2 h. Noteworthy is the case of tert-butyl enoate (entry
8) containing a distant tetrazolyl sulfide; no effect on the
rate of hydrosilylation by these heteroatoms was seen (per-
haps by competitive complexation with BDP for copper).
Ethyl sorbate (entry 9) reacts with little regioselectivity to
give an inseparable mixture of 1,4- and 1,6-reduction
products (1:3, favoring 1,6- followed by R-protonation). No
attempt was made to improve this ratio (e.g., by lowering
the temperature). An acetyleneic ester (entry 10) reduces
smoothly to the corresponding saturated derivative; no enoate
intermediate could be observed in the course of this conver-
10
sion. Cinnamylnitrile (entry 11) was slow to convert, even
at an S/L ratio of 100:1.
Attempts were made to mimic Stryker’s use of hydrogen
1b
gas as a stoichiometric reductant in several reactions. Under
our standard conditions, PMHS was replaced by hydrogen
at pressures up to 50 psi. Surprisingly, no reduction of sub-
strate was observed in any case. Perhaps the bidentate nature
a
Ligand 1 (0.1 mol %) was combined with 5% SR; GC
conversion.
3
of BDP on copper(I), as opposed to monodentate Ph P in
SR, prevents insertion of hydrogen to form the metal hydride.
The stability of toluene solutions of (BDP)CuH over time
has also been examined (Scheme 3). Best results were
)
20 afforded only 7% conversion after 24 h, 2 led to
quantitative reduction in less than 5 h with a S/L ratio of
1
000:1. Increasing the S/L ratio to 10,000:1 lengthened the
reaction time to 15 h (yield: 98%). Enhanced reactivity was
not observed, nor was the extent of conversion improved,
in the reaction of isophorone with SR in the presence of
3
added triphenylphosphine (2 equiv relative to (Ph P)CuH).
However, addition of only 0.1% BDP to SR (4 mol %
relative to substrate) led to complete reduction of isophorone.
The examples in Table 1 depict the versatility of this
process. Other enones (entries 1-3) were also well-behaved
toward (BDP)CuH. Cholestenone (entry 4) was found to
over-reduce to the â-alcohol using 2 in the presence of
t-BuOH, although exclusive conjugate reduction to the ketone
could be realized in the absence of this additive (entry 5).
By contrast, 4% SR gave a 1:1 mix of 1,2- and 1,4-adducts,
along with ca. one-third of the starting material after 12 h.
No over-reduction was observed in the case of myrtanal
obtained when only 1% copper was present, which relative
to the amount of ligand present (0.1%) is still a 10-fold
excess. Under these conditions, some of the excess copper
precipitated out of solution, presumably as nonligated copper
hydride. The trivial addition of triphenylphosphine (1 equiv
relative to copper; 1%) prevents this occurrence and allows
for a stock solution that can be stored indefinitely at room
temperature under argon. tert-Butyl alcohol was omitted
from this formulation due to its tendency to decompose
silanes over time.
Reaction times could be reduced by employing somewhat
higher temperatures, conveniently achieved under microwave
irradiation (Table 2). Sixty degrees was determined to be
the upper limit for use of (BDP)CuH in conjugate reductions.
Higher temperatures resulted in competitive reagent decom-
position. In the specific case of isophorone, which requires
(entry 6). As expected, enoates reacted somewhat more
1
1
(
2) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Keith, J.; Papa, P.; Vivian, R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1
998, 39, 4627. (b) Appella, D. H.; Moritani, Y.; Shintani, R.; Ferreira, E.
M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9473. (c) Hughes, G.;
Kimura, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11253. (d)
Czekelius, C.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4793. (e)
Desrosiers, J.-N.; Charette, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5955.
(3) Brestensky, D. M.; Huseland, D. E.; McGettigan, C.; Stryker, J. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 3749.
(
(
(
4) Miao, R.; Li, S.; Chiu, P. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 6737.
5) Lipshutz, B. H.; Papa, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4580.
6) Lipshutz, B. H.; Noson, K.; Chrisman, W.; Lower, A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 8779.
7) Lawrence, N. J.; Drew, M. D. D.; Bushell, S. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1999, 3381.
(
(10) Kim, D.; Park, B.-M.; Yun, J. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1755.
(11) Preparation of 10 mL of 1 M Stock Solution of (BDP)CuH. In
a flame-dried 50 mL amber vial which was cooled under argon were added
Cu(OAc)2‚H2O (20.0 mg, 0.1 mmol), bis-diphenylphoshinobenzene (4.46
mg, 0.01 mmol), and triphenylphosphine (27.0 mg, 0.1 mmol). The reagents
were dissolved in freshly distilled toluene (8.0 mL) and allowed to stir at
room temperature for 1 h. Polymethylhydrosiloxane (PMHS) (2.0 mL, 30
mmol) was added dropwise to the stirring solution. There was an immediate
color change from blue to red. The stock solution was thoroughly purged
with argon and sealed. Storage in a refrigerator is recommended.
1
(
8) H NMR (benzene-d6) δ 1.49. Treatment of Stryker’s reagent (δ 3.55)
with ligand 1 results in the total disappearance of the hydride signal with
concommitant appearance of a peak at δ 1.49. The addition of PPh3 to
(
1
BDP)CuH leads to no change in the spectrum for the hydride signal at δ
.49.
(
9) (a) Jurkauskas, V.; Sadighi, J. P.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003,
5
, 2417. (b) Lipshutz, B. H.; Chrisman, W.; Noson, K. J. Organomet. Chem.
2
001, 624, 367.
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 2, 2008
291