832
X.-B. Yang et al./Chemical Papers 65 (6) 829–834 (2011)
Table 3. Spectral data of prepared compounds
Compound 1H NMR and EIMS data
IVa
IVb
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 9.19 (s, 1H, NH), 7.74 (s, 1H, NH), 7.34–7.23 (m, 5H, Haryl), 5.14 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz,
CH), 3.95 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.08 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 260 (16) (M+), 231 (67), 183 (100), 155 (25), 137 (20)
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 9.38 (s, 1H, NH), 8.13 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, Haryl), 8.07 (s, 1H, Haryl), 7.91 (s, 1H, NH),
7.71–7.64 (m, 2H, Haryl), 5.30 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, CH), 3.98 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.27 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.08 (t,
3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 305 (10) (M+), 288 (60), 232 (24), 183 (100), 155 (22), 137 (12)
IVc
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 9.25 (s, 1H, NH), 7.77 (s, 1H, NH), 7.38 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Haryl), 7.23 (d, 2H, J = 8.4
Hz, Haryl), 5.13 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, CH), 3.96 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.25 (s, 3H, CH3 ), 1.08 (t, 3H, J = 7.2
Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 294 (10) (M+), 265 (100), 221 (40), 183 (90), 155 (32), 137 (15)
IVd
IVe
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 9.27 (s, 1H, NH), 7.70 (s, 1H, NH), 7.41–7.27 (m, 4H, Haryl), 5.62 (d, 1H, J = 2.8 Hz,
CH), 3.86 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.97 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 294 (10) (M+), 265 (50), 221 (40), 183 (100), 155 (30), 137 (15)
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 9.32 (s, 1H, OH), 9.11 (s, 1H, NH), 7.61 (s, 1H, NH), 7.01 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Haryl), 6.67
(d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Haryl), 5.03 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, CH), 3.95 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.23 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.08
(t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 276 (32) (M+), 247 (100), 203 (70), 183 (60), 155 (40), 137 (32)
IVf
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 9.15 (s, 1H, NH), 7.67 (s, 1H, NH), 7.13 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, Haryl), 6.86 (d, 2H, J = 8.4
Hz, Haryl), 5.08 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, CH), 3.95 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 3.72 (s, 3H, CH3O), 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3),
1.08 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 290 (32) (M+), 261 (100), 217 (50), 183 (28), 155 (12), 137 (10)
IVg
IVh
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.34 (s, 1H, NH), 9.66 (s, 1H, NH), 7.37–7.21 (m, 5H, Haryl), 5.14 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz,
CH), 3.98 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.08 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 276 (88) (M+), 247 (55), 199 (100), 171 (25) ), 153 (12)
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.39 (s, 1H, NH), 9.68 (s, 1H, NH), 7.42 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Haryl), 7.22 (d, 2H, J = 8.4
Hz, Haryl), 5.16 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, CH), 3.98 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.08 (t, 3H, J = 7.2
Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 310 (80) (M+), 281 (100), 247 (65), 199 (70), 171 (25), 137 (35)
IVi
IVj
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.37 (s, 1H, NH), 9.61 (s, 1H, NH), 7.43–7.29 (m, 4H, Haryl), 5.64 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz,
CH), 3.89 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.99 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 310 (80) (M+), 281 (60), 237 (38), 199 (100), 171 (22), 153 (10)
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.25 (s, 1H, OH), 9.56 (s, 1H, NH), 9.42 (s, 1H, NH), 6.99 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Haryl),
6.70 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, Haryl), 5.05 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz, CH), 3.97 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 2.27 (s, 3H, CH3),
1.08 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 292 (85) (M+), 263 (100), 219 (60), 199 (35), 171 (12)
IVk
1H NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 10.29 (s, 1H, NH), 9.60 (s, 1H, NH), 7.11 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, Haryl), 6.89 (d, 2H, J = 8.4
Hz, Haryl), 5.10 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, CH), 3.98 (q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2O), 3.72 (s, 3H, CH3O), 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3),
1.09 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3)
MS, m/z (Ir/%): 306 (80) (M+), 277 (100), 233 (70), 199 (40), 171 (10)
The catalyst recovered after washing with ace-
tone followed by drying at 60◦C was used in the
next cycle without any additional ZSBEDP. A min-
imal decrease in activity was observed, as shown in
Fig. 5. The acidity study was performed for fur-
ther insight into the reason for the decrease in ac-
tivity. The pH values of ZSBEDP and ZSBEDP re-
covered after five cycles were monitored under the
same conditions. The pH value of the recovered ZS-
BEDP is higher than that of ZSBEDP. On the basis
of this result, this decrease in activity of the recov-
ered ZSBEDP may be due to the decrease in acid-
ity.
Inspired by the previous results, we expanded the
Biginelli reaction catalysed by ZSBEDP under opti-
mised conditions to other types of aromatic aldehy-
100
90
80
70
60
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Number of cycles
Fig. 5. Reusability study of ZSBEDP in the condensation reac-
tion of benzaldehyde, ethyl acetoacetate, and urea. All
cycles proceeded under the same reaction conditions.