Vol. 30, No. 4 (2018)
Haval-Argade Contrathermodynamic Rearrangement in Synthesis of Farinomalein 903
The detailed reaction coordinate of formation of farino-
malein (1) and isofarinomalein (2) has been showed in Fig. 1.
The number of intermediates encountered in the HA contra-
thermodynamic rearrangement were also learned, although the
enthalpy values of those intermediate were numerically less
negative but the overall trend was similar to present study. The
scalar values the enthalpy of compounds 2-7 are relatively
high this may be due to the presence of acid functional group
and intramolecular hydrogen bonding present in it.
Conclusion
The present study gives a rational explanation on the
reaction path and the mechanism followed in formation of
farinomalein (1) and isofarinomalein (2). It also demonstrates
that kinetic conditions and thermodynamic stability plays an
important role in the reaction coordinate.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank UGC, New Delhi, Board of College &
University Development, Pune, India of Savitribai Phule Pune
University for research fund and Deccan Education Society’s
Fergusson College, Pune, India for their encouragement.
The obtained data utilized for the theoretical interpretation
viz. The compound 3 is converted to intermediate 6 with rate
k1 and compound 4 is converted to intermediate 5 with rate k2.
The intermediate 4 and 6 have enthalpies -151.51 and -148.06
kcal/mol, respectively. The reaction with cyanuric chloride and
triethylamine led to kinetically controlled and thermodynami-
cally less product. The practically isolated yields and enthalpies
rationally led to plausible fact that k1 >> k2. Fig. 2 explicitly
indicates change in enthalpies with reaction coordinate. The
intermediate 6 has intra-molecular hydrogen bonding, which
could be agitated by rotation of C-C bond of dihydro-1,3-oxazin-
one ring with rest of the moiety. The absence of intra-molecular
hydrogen bond elevated the ∆H towards less negative and that
too favour k1 >> k2. On the other hand, the intermediate 6 is
not having any butyrioimidolide carbonyl group which would
shift the allylic hydrogen and overruled the possibility of for-
mation of likely intermediate 7. The acetic acid reflux coverts
the intermediate 4 and 6 to farinomalein (1) and isofarinomalein
(2). The theoretically calculated enthalpy of isofarinomalein
and farinomalein are -160.20 and -144.61 kcal/mol, respec-
tively. In conclusion, the intermediates 4 and 6 played crucial
role in determining the fate of the HA contrathermodynamic
rearrangement in the reaction.
REFERENCES
1. S.P. Putri, H. Kinoshita, F. Ihara, Y. Igarashi and T. Nihira, J. Nat. Prod.,
72, 1544 (2009);
2. AI. Molnar, D.M. Gibsonc and S.B. Krasnoffc, Nat. Prod. Rep., 27, 1241
(2010);
https://doi.org/10.1039/C001459C.
3. R.A. Davis,A.R. Carroll, K.T.Andrews, G.M. Boyle, T.L. Tran, P.C. Healy,
J.A. Kalaitzisc and R.G. Shivasd, Org. Biomol. Chem., 8, 1785 (2010);
https://doi.org/10.1039/B924169H.
4. M.E.Amrani,A. Debbab,A.H.Aly,V. Wray, S. Dobretsov, W.E.G. Maller,
W. Lin, D. Lai and P. Proksch, Tetrahedron Lett., 53, 6721 (2012);
5. W.H. Miles and M. Yan, Tetrahedron Lett., 51, 1710 (2010);
6. S.T.Aiwale, P. Sardi and S. Dallavalle, Synth. Commun., 43, 1455 (2012);
7. S. Lahore, S.T. Aiwale, P. Sardi and S. Dallavalle, Tetrahedron Lett.,
55, 4196 (2014);
8. K. Tanaka, T. Sugino and F. Toda, Green Chem., 2, 303 (2000);
https://doi.org/10.1039/B006565J.
9. J.D. White, P. Hrnciar and F. Stappenbeck, J. Org. Chem., 64, 7871
(1999);
Reaction coordinate
-135.00
10. K.P. Haval and N.P. Argade, Tetrahedron, 62, 3557 (2006);
11. Y. Furuya, K. Ishihara and H. Yamamoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 11240
(2005);
12. K.P. Haval, S.B. Mhaske and N.P. Argade, Tetrahedron, 62, 937 (2006);
13. J.E. Baldwin and M.J. Lusch, Tetrahedron, 38, 2939 (1982);
14. J.E. Baldwin and L.I. Kruse, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 233 (1977);
15. M.B. Smith and J. March, March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry:
Reactions, Mechanisms and Structure, Wiley-Interscience, USA, p. 323
(2007).
0
1
2
3
4
5
-138.54
-140.00
-145.00
-150.00
-155.00
-160.00
-165.00
-144.61
-148.06
-151.13
k1
k2
-160.20
-160.20
Fig. 2. Graph of enthalpy vs. reaction coordinate