3
12
H. Sun et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 424 (2016) 311–322
exhibited significantly enhanced MO and phenol photodegradation
activity under visible-light irradiation [37].
(002)
g-C N4 (100)
( f )
3
Herein, surface energy calculations of Bi12TiO20 crystals were
carried out based on density function theory (DFT), and the {111}
0.5:0.08 Bi TiO20/g-C N4
12
3
( e )
( d )
( c )
facet of Bi TiO was proved to be the most active facet among
1
2
20
the {111}, {110} and {100} facets due to its highest surface
0
.5:0.04 Bi TiO20/g-C N4
1
2
3
energy. Based on this, Bi TiO with active {111} facets exposed
1
2
20
is expected to display excellent photocatalytic performance under
visible light irradiation. In this work, we successfully synthesized
the Bi12TiO20 tetrahedrons with nearly 100% {111} facets exposed
by using a simple hydrothermal method, and then developed a
0
.5:0.02 Bi TiO20/g-C N4
12
3
0.5:0.01 Bi TiO20/g-C N4
( b )
( a )
12
3
novel composite Bi12TiO20/g-C N4 via an ultrasonic method. The
3
(310)
(
321)
photocatalytic activity of the composite Bi12TiO20/g-C N was eval-
3
4
(
222)
uated by the degradation of gaseous formaldehyde under visible
light. Meanwhile, the facet coupling effect between Bi12TiO20
Bi12TiO20
(220)
-
{
111} facets and g-C N -{002} facets was studied.
3
4
5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
2
. Experimental
.1. Synthesis of catalyst
All the chemicals were of analytical purity, and were used as
2 Theta(º)
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of (a) Bi12TiO20; (b) B/g-1; (c) B/g-2; (d) B/g-4; (e) B/g-8; and
f) g-C3N4.
2
(
received without further purification. The {111} facets exposed
were analyzed by a UV–vis spectrophotometer (UV2550, Shimadzu,
Japan), and fine BaSO4 powders were used as a reflectance standard.
Bi TiO microtetrahedrons were prepared by a hydrothermal
12
20
method. Typically, Bi O (12 mmol) and TiO2 (1 mmol) were dis-
2
3
solved in NaOH solution (4 mol/L, 60 mL) under magnetic stirring.
After that, the mixture was transferred to a stainless steel Teflon-
lined autoclave of 100 mL capacity. The autoclave was sealed and
2.3. Theoretical computational details
Surface energy and electronic structure were calculated with
a VASP package using plane wave basis sets based on the first
principle theory. Perdew-Burke-Ernzerh was used as the exchange-
correlation function. The surfaces were modeled by 2.5 thicknesses
without fixing any layers, and the vacuum separation between the
slabs was set to be 15 Å. The surface energy Esurf is defined as [38]:
◦
heated at 220 C for 0.5 h and then cooled to room temperature nat-
urally. The final products were collected by centrifugation, washed
◦
with distilled water and followed by drying at 70 C for 5 h.
Pure g-C N was prepared in a typical synthesis route. 10.0 g
3
4
melamine was put into an alumina crucible with a cover, heated
◦
◦
at 550 C for 4 h with a ramp rate of 2.5 C/min, and then cooled to
room temperature. The obtained yellow agglomerates were ground
into powder in a mortar.
Esurf = (Eslab − n × Ebulk)/(2 × A)
(1)
where Eslab is the total energy of the relaxed slab, Ebulk is the total
energy of the bulk, n is the number of the bulk unit cells in the
supercell to model the surface, and A is the surface area.
The Bi12TiO20/g-C N composites were fabricated by dispers-
3
4
ing 0.02 g of g-C N and 0.5 g of Bi12TiO20 microtetrahedrons in
3
4
the mixed solvent of ethanol and deionized water and then soni-
cating the mixture at 59 KHz for 6 h at ambient temperature. The
powders were collected by centrifugation, washed with deionized
2.4. Photocatalytic activity test
◦
water for three times, followed by drying at 70 C for 6 h. A series
The photocatalytic activity of the as-prepared samples was eval-
of Bi12TiO20/g-C N composites were synthesized by changing the
3
4
uated by the degradation of gaseous formaldehyde under visible
light irradiation. All experiments were carried out in a sealed,
cylindrical, and stainless gas-phase batch reactor with a volume
of 600 mL. A 300 W Dy lamp was used to irradiate the reactor,
and the visible light irradiation was achieved with a glass filter
amount of g-C N in the preparation procedure. The as-prepared
3
4
composites were designated as B/g-X, where X = 1, 2, 4, and 8,
denote the composites Bi12TiO20/g-C N4 with mass ratio 0.5:0.01,
3
0
.5:0.02, 0.5:0.04, and 0.5:0.08 of Bi12TiO20 to g-C N , respectively.
3 4
(
≥ 400 nm). The experiments were performed at room tempera-
ture as follows: 0.5 g of the as-prepared catalyst was dispersed
onto the surface of a dish with a diameter of 7 cm. After placing
the dish with catalyst in the reactor, 0.5 L of formaldehyde was
injected with a syringe into the reactor. Once the concentration
of gaseous formaldehyde was stable, the lamp was switched on to
2.2. Characterization
The structure and crystallinity of the as-prepared samples were
characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis on a D/MAX-RB
diffractometer with Cu K␣ radiation under the operation conditions
of 40 kV and 50 mA. SEM (JSM-5610LV) was used to characterize
the morphology. Transmission electron microscopy, high resolu-
tion transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and selected area
electron diffraction (SAED, JEM2100F, 200 kV) were taken to char-
acterize the morphology and microstructure of the products. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (VG Multilab2000) was employed to
analyze the valence states of the elements with a monochro-
matic Mg K␣ source and a charge neutralizer. The binding energies
obtained in the XPS spectral analysis were corrected for specimen
charging by referencing C 1 s to 284.5 eV. A Nexus Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy (Thermo Nicolet, USA) was used to detect the
chemical bonds of the samples. The absorption edges of the samples
initiate the photocatalytic reactions. The concentrations of CO and
2
gaseous formaldehyde were constantly measured by a photoacous-
tic field gasmonitor (Innova1412, AirTech Instruments, Denmark)
every 15 min interval.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Structure and crystallinity
The XRD patterns of the samples g-C N , Bi12TiO20 and
3
4
Bi12TiO20/g-C N4 prepared under different conditions are shown
3
◦
◦
◦
◦
in Fig. 1. The diffraction peaks at 2ꢀ = 24.60 , 27.58 , 30.28 , 32.74 ,