42
C. Ye et al. / Steroids 93 (2015) 39–46
2.10. Odoroside G (7)
incubation for 24 h at 37 °C at the appropriate density of 8 ꢀ 104/
mL in 96-well tissue culture plates (100 lL per well), compounds
White power (MeOH); ½a D20
ꢂ17.0 2 (c 1.060, MeOH)].
ꢁ
ꢂ11.0 (c 0.27, MeOH) [[12] ½a D24
ꢁ
1–3, 5–10 were added after being dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) and diluted at a concentration of 100 mol/L (the final
l
concentration of DMSO was 0.1%), then the cells continued to be
incubated with the nine compounds for 48 h. Cell growth was mea-
sured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) assay incubated for 3–4 h at 37 °C. Then, the med-
2.11. Digitoxigenin 3-O-b- -cellobioside (8)
D
White power (MeOH); ½a D20
ꢁ
+8.1 (c 0.12, MeOH); 1H NMR (CD3-
OD, 300 MHz): d 5.89 (1H, s, H-22), 5.00 (1H, d, J = 18.6 Hz, H-21),
4.91 (1H, dd, J = 18.3, 1.5 Hz, H-21), 4.41 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-10),
4.35(1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-100); 4.06 (1H, br s, H-3), 2.83 (1H, m, H-
17), 0.96 (3H, s, H-19), 0.88 (3H, s, H-18), 13C NMR (CD3OD,
75 MHz): d 178.5 (C-20), 177.3 (C-23), 117.8 (C-22), 104.6 (C-10),
102.6 (C-100), 86.5 (C-14), 80.9 (C-40), 78.1 (C-300), 77.9 (C-500),
76.6 (C-30), 76.4 (C-50), 75.8 (C-200), 75.4 (C-21), 75.0 (C-20), 74.9
(C-3), 71.4 (C-400), 62.5 (C-600), 62.0 (C-60), 52.2 (C-17), 51.1 (C-
13), 42.7 (C-8), 41.0 (C-12), 37.5 (C-5), 36.9 (C-9), 36.3 (C-10),
33.4 (C-15), 31.3 (C-1), 30.9 (C-4), 28.1 (C-16), 27.8 (C-2), 27.5
(C-6), 24.1 (C-19), 22.6 (C-11), 22.4 (C-7), 16.4 (C-18).
ium was removed, and the cells were dissolved in 100
sulfoxide and the absorbance at 492 nm was measured. Cisplatin
(100 mol/L) was used as a positive control. The percentage of cell
lL dimethyl
l
growth inhibition was calculated as follows:
Cell growth inhibition ð%Þ¼½A549ðcontrolÞꢂA549ðcompoundÞꢁ=A549ðcontrolÞ
ꢀ100
The IC50 values of compounds that inhibited cell viability by
over 50% at a concentration of 100 lM were calculated. All cyto-
toxic activity data were analyzed by SPSS (16.0) and expressed as
mean S.E.
2.12. Digitoxigenin-3-O-b-D-glucosyl-(1?4)-3-O-acetyl-b-D-
digitoxoside (9)
3. Results and discussion
White power (MeOH); ½a D20
ꢁ
+20.0 (c 0.17, MeOH) [(13) ½a D25
ꢁ
Compound 1, a white amorphous powder, with the formula
+29.1 (c 0.75, MeOH)]; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 300 MHz): d 5.89 (1H, s,
H-22), 5.49 (1H, m, H-10), 5.00 (1H, d, J = 18.3 Hz, H-21), 4.93
(1H,d, J = 1.5 Hz, H-21), 4.36 (1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-100); 4.01 (1H, br
s, H-3), 2.83 (1H, m, H-17), 2.08 (3H, s, 3-O-Me), 1.32 (3H, d,
J = 6.2 Hz, H-10), 0.94 (3H, s, H-19), 0.88 (3H, s, H-18), 13C NMR
(CD3OD, 150 MHz): d 178.5 (C-20), 177.3 (C-23), 172.8 (C-2-O-
Ac), 117.8 (C-22), 105.8 (C-100), 97.6 (C-10), 86.5 (C-14), 81.6 (C-
40), 78.0 (C-300), 78.0 (C-500), 75.4 (C-200), 75.3 (C-21), 75.1 (C-3),
72.0 (C-30), 71.5 (C-400), 70.6 (C-50), 63.0 (C-600), 52.2 (C-17), 51.1
(C-13), 42.7 (C-12), 41.0 (C-8), 38.1 (C-9), 37.5 (C-5), 36.9 (C-10),
36.4 (C-20), 33.4 (C-15), 31.4 (C-1), 31.4 (C-4), 28.1 (C-16), 27.9
(C-6), 27.6 (C-2), 24.3 (C-19), 22.6 (C-7), 22.4 (C-11), 21.3 (C-3-O-
Me), 18.6 (C-60), 16.4 (C-18).
C
44H68O20 having an HR–ESI–MS at m/z 939.4183 [M+Na]+ ion
(calcd for 939.4196).
The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra displayed characteristic sig-
nals of a cardenolide [dH 5.90 (1H, s, H-22), 5.00 (1H, dd, J = 18.6,
1.3 Hz, H-21), 4.91 (1H, dd, J = 18.3, 1.5 Hz, H-21), dC 178.3 (C-
20), 75.3 (C-21), 117.8 (C-22), 177.2 (C-23)] representative of an
a
,b-unsaturated c-lactone, and two methyl groups [dH 0.88 (s,
18-Me), 0.92 (s, 19-Me), dC 16.3 (C-18), 17.2 (C-19)]. In addition,
one oxymethyl [dH 3.44 (s), dC 58.7] and one acetyl [dH 2.09 (s),
dC 172.2, 21.1] group were observed. The aglycone part of 1 was
identified as periplogenin by the above analysis and comparison
with the1H and 13C NMR resonances in the Ref. [15].
The presence of three sugar units in 1 was indicated by three
anomeric proton signals at dH 4.53 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-10), dH
4.40 (1H, d, J = 7.7 Hz, H-1000) and dH 4.54 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-100).
It was also evident from the 1H and 13C NMR data that one of the
sugar units was 6-deoxysugar due to the proton signal displayed
at 1.31 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-60) [16]. The HMBC correlation between
the methoxy protons (dH 3.44) and C0-3 (dC 83.4), showed that
the methoxy group was located at C0-3. The methyl protons (dH
2.10, dC 21.1) and the carbonyl carbon (dC 172.2) indicated the
presence of an acetyl group, which was located at C-2’ of digitalose
by the connectivity from dH 5.09 (H-20) to dC 172.2 in HMBC (Fig. 2).
Complete assignment of the sugar protons and carbons by 1H–1H
COSY and HSQC experiments showed characteristic signals of one
2-O-acetyl b-digitalopyranosyl unit (dC 102.5, 72.7, 83.4, 75.4,
71.8, 17.4, 58.7, 172.2, 21.1) and two b-glucopyranosyl (dC 104.6,
75.8, 77.8, 71.8, 77.4, 70.4; 105.1, 75.2, 78.1, 71.7, 78.1, 62.9) units
(Table 1). An unambiguous determination of the sugar sequencing
and linkage sites was made from the HMBC spectrum. The HMBC
correlations from H-1000 (dH 4.40) to C-600 (dC 70.4), H-100 (dH 4.54)
to C-40 and H-10 (dH 4.53) to C-3 (dC 78.6) of the aglycone moiety,
suggested the connections of the sugar units, and the connection
between the glycosides and aglycone. On the basis of this evidence,
the structure of compound 1 was established as periplogenin 3-O-
2.13. 5b-Hydroxygitoxigenin (10)
White power (MeOH);
+48.6 (c 0.62, MeOH)].
½
a 2D0
+13.7 (c 0.26, MeOH) [[14]
ꢁ
½ ꢁ
a 2D0
2.14. Identification of the monosaccharide of compounds 1–6
A solution containing compound 1 (1 mg) in 1, 4-dioxane
(0.5 mL) and 1 N HCl (4.5 mL) was heated at 90 °C for 6 h. After
cooling, the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 ꢀ 5 mL),
followed by neutralizing the aqueous layer with 1 N KOH.
Compounds 2–6 were also treated in the same way. The monosac-
charides were purified by preparative TLC, then identified using
n-BuOH-Me2CO-H2O (8:5:1) and the Rf values were 0.45, 0.60,
0.80 and 0.85 for glucose, digitalose, digitoxose and cymarose,
respectively. The absolute configurations were determined by
measurement of the optical rotations as
D
-glucose [½a 2D3
ꢁ
+51.3 (c
0.1, H2O)],
D
-digitalose [½a D23
ꢁ
+105.0 (c 0.1, H2O)], D-digitoxose
[½a 2D3
ꢁ
+42.1 (c 0.03, H2O)] and
D
-cymarose [½a 2D3
ꢁ
+ 55.9 (c 0.07,
H2O)]. We figured out the position of the sugar attachments by
the H–C long range correlations in the HMBC spectrum and 1H
and 13C NMR chemical shifts, and mentioned it in detail in the
structure analysis of results and discussion part.
[O-b-
D
-glucopyranosyl-(1?6)-O-b-D-glucopyranosyl-(1?4)-2-O-
acetyl-b-
D
-digitalopyranoside].
Compound 2, obtained as a white amorphous powder, had a
molecular formula of C41H64O18 from the HR–ESI–MS at m/z
889.4030 [M+HCOO]ꢂ ion in negative mode (calcd for 889.4075).
Compared with the 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic data of com-
pound 1, the aglycone of 2 was identical to that of 1. The rest of the
2.15. In vitro anti-proliferation bioassay
A549 and NCI-H460 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium
(GIBCO, NY, U.S.A.) and maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After