N. Coleman Jr. et al. / Journal of Solid State Chemistry 232 (2015) 241–248
243
observed by wisps of fine powder or smoke exiting the non-sealed
edges of the reactor lid and reactions were usually complete
within a few seconds leaving the reactor exterior walls warm to
the touch. The inside of the reactor was usually covered with a
thin coating of yellowish, off-white material, and a large amount of
a darker glassy product was in the crucible. In order to purify the
crude products and remove sodium containing impurities, metal
doped titania samples were washed with 100 ml 1 M HCl for
ꢀ30 min at room temperature under constant stirring. The acid-
washed samples were then rinsed several times with distilled
water until the pH of the rinse was neutral. All solid products were
dried in air at room temperature. Selected samples were also an-
nealed for one day at 1000 °C in air in a box furnace at a heating at
a rate of ꢀ100 °C/hr. The samples were cooled naturally to room
temperature.
quantitative surface compositions and peak deconvolutions were
with a KratosAxis specific element library (KratosAxis-F1s.lib) and
the following RSF factors: Ti2p (2.0), Cr 2p (2.43), Mn2p (2.66),
Fe2p (2.96), Co2p (3.59), Ni (4.04), Cu (5.32). Relative atomic sur-
face compositions were measured from survey scans.
2.4. Photocatalytic oxidative degradation of dyes
Photocatalytic oxidative degradation of methylene blue (MB)
and methyl orange (MO) in air was performed using an Ace-Ha-
novia medium pressure 450 W mercury lamp in a water cooled
Pyrex jacket. Approximately 10 mg of doped and undoped titanias
were loaded into 20 ml pre-cleaned glass scintillation vials with
10 ml of a 3.00 ꢁ 10ꢂ5 M MB solution or 6.11 ꢁ 10ꢂ5 M MO solu-
tion and a stir bar. A dye sample with no powder was run as a
blank. SSM synthesized undoped rutile TiO2 and Degussa P25 TiO2
(ꢀ80% anatase) samples were also used for comparison. The
sample vials were placed on a large stir plate about 25 cm away
from the mercury lamp, all of which were contained in a closed
photochemical reactor cabinet. The samples were allowed to stir in
the dark for 30 min to allow surface equilibration or adsorption of
the MB or MO dye. UV irradiation was in regular intervals of 5 min
or longer. Between each interval, the samples were centrifuged
and UV–vis measurements were taken on the solution. The ana-
lyzed solutions were returned to the original vial and the irra-
diation was repeated. A similar set of experiments were performed
using 420 nm cut off filters (Edmund Optics) to limit the UV lamp
output to visible light wavelengths. According to our testing, these
cut off filters have a stop band limit or 0.001% T point at 430 nm.
Linear regression of ꢂln (C/Co) versus time data for 4 data points
in the first 20 min of UV irradiation (initial 40 min for visible) was
used to estimate initial rate constants for MB dye degradation.
2.3. Product characterization
Phase identification was conducted using Siemens D5000 or
Bruker D8 DaVinci powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) systems that
analyzed ground powders affixed to glass slides with either va-
cuum grease or using an acetone slurry. Morphologies and semi-
quantitative elemental analysis was obtained by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) using
a Hitachi S4800 or S3400 system. Samples were ground to fine
powders and some were lightly pressed into thin pellets for EDS
with an IR pellet hand press then affixed onto aluminum stubs
with carbon tape. Samples were carbon coated to minimize char-
ging. Quantitative analysis by ICP–OE spectrometry (Varian 720-
ES) was performed on acid dissolved samples. Approximately 5 mg
of each sample was dissolved in an acid mixture of 5 ml of con-
centrated H2SO4 and 1 ml of concentrated HNO3, which was he-
ated to ꢀ385 °C for 1 h. The cooled solutions were diluted to the
1–100 ppm range depending on the metal concentration. Cali-
bration standard curves were used to determine weight percent
content for dopant metals and titanium. Magnetic susceptibility
measurements were performed on solid powders at room tem-
perature using a Johnson-Matthey MSB (Evans) magnetic sus-
ceptibility balance. Strongly magnetic samples were diluted
in NaCl prior to analysis. All molar susceptibility results were
corrected for sample core diamagnetism for TiO2 of
2.9 ꢁ 10ꢂ5 cm3/mol or M–TiO2 of 2.98 ꢁ 10ꢂ5 cm3/mol. Spin-only
magnetic moments were calculated from molar susceptibility per
mole of dopant metal using mB¼2.83(χm ꢁ T)1/2. Scaled molar
susceptibility was calculated by subtracting χm from undoped
SSM–TiO2 and dividing by the relative molar amount of M de-
termined by ICP MxTi1ꢂxO2 structure. Solid diffuse reflectance UV–
vis measurements were made with a LabSphere RSA accessory on
an HP 8453 UV–vis spectrometer. The powders were physically
embedded onto filter paper supports sandwiched between glass
microscope slides. Each sample's diffuse reflectance (R) data was
converted to Kubelka–Munk (K–M) units and plots of F(R)¼(1ꢂ
R)2/2R versus energy used to estimate absorption energy onsets or
band gaps. The absorption onset data is derived from extrapolation
of linear region of absorption rise down to baseline spectral region.
Single baselines were used except for the Co– and Mn–TiO2 data
where different baselines better represented onset starting points
of different regions. FT-IR spectra were obtained for each sample
using KBr pellets in a Nicolet Nexus 760 spectrometer. X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were obtained on a Kratos
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis of metal-doped titania via rapid SSM reactions
Rapid and exothermic self-propagating SSM methods for the
synthesis of inorganic metal oxide and non-oxide materials have
broad flexibility to produce binary solids and more complex
structures containing intimately mixed multiple metal and non-
metal components. In the current study, we take advantage of the
rapid and non-equilibrium exothermic processes of SSM reactions
to incorporate moderate amounts of a second transition-metal
into the rutile TiO2 structure. Typical thermodynamically driven
methods for doping transition-metals into titania use sol–gel or
solution precipitation methods followed by thermal processing,
which leads to low metal dopant levels (ꢀ1%) in titania. Given the
rapid heating/crystallization afforded by SSM reactions, there is
potential for kinetically stabilized higher dopant level incorpora-
tion, thus we “overloaded” the reaction system with 10 at% levels
of dopant metals. Such additions, should impart visible optical
absorption properties to the UV absorbing titania. The ideal SSM
reactions for MCl2 dopants (Mn, Co, Ni, Cu,) and MCl3 (Cr, Fe) are
shown below in Eqs. (2) and (3).
0.9 TiCl3þ0.1 MCl2þ1.45 Na2O2-M0.1Ti0.9O2þ0.45 O2þ2.9 NaCl (2)
Axis Ultra Imaging spectrometer using monochromatic Al K ra-
α
0.9 TiCl3þ0.1 MCl3þ1.5 Na2O2-M0.1Ti0.9O2þ0.5 O2þ3 NaCl (3)
diation. Powders were embedded in indium foil for analysis. Sur-
vey spectra were obtained for acid washed samples (nominally
10 at% M doped TiO2) and regional area spectra were obtained for
Ti2p, O1s, as well as M2p (M¼Cr, Fe, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu). Peak posi-
tions are reported relative to the C1s peak at 284.5 eV. Semi-
In all cases, the SSM reactions were easily initiated in a self-
propagating mode using a heated filament in the steel SSM re-
actor. The doped titania products (generally referred to as M–TiO2)
after water and acid workup were visibly colored, with colors