Mixed-Anion and Mixed-Cation Borohydride KZn(BH4)Cl2
2 KZn(BH4)Cl2 Ǟ K2ZnCl4 + Zn + 2/n (BH3)n + 2 H2
(2) tor, a calibrated wavelength of λ = 0.701135 Å and 0.5 mm glass
capillaries as sample holders. The 2D SR-PXD data were inte-
grated into 1D powder patterns. Diffraction peaks were indexed by
Dicvol[23] in a primitive monoclinic cell. The structure was solved
in the space group P21 by global optimization in direct space with
the program FOX,[24] varying positions of one Zn2+, one K+, two
The loss of (BH3)n gases indicates an irreversible charac-
ter of the hydrogen release from 1 and 2. Furthermore, we
mention that ball-milled samples of KBH4 and ZnCl2 in
higher molar ratios, i.e. 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1, have also been
prepared and investigated. SR-PXD data for these samples
reveal a diffraction pattern from another novel material (3),
which is different from that of KZn(BH4)Cl2 and 2 (Sup-
–
Cl– and one BH4 ion and using antibump restraints of 1.6–2.1 Å.
Examination of the resulting structure by Platon[25] revealed higher
crystallographic symmetry, e.g. space group P21/m. The final refine-
ment was performed by the Rietveld method in P21/m with the
porting Information, Figure S3). The powder diffraction program Fullprof.[26] The background was described by linear in-
terpolation between selected points. Because all atoms occupy spe-
cial positions on the mirror plane, the refinement involved only few
refined parameters. At room temperature the unit cell parameters
are a = 7.6257(9), b = 5.7375(6), c = 6.8786(9) Å, β = 97.794(15)°,
Z = 2. The highest-quality data set was recorded at 82 °C, for which
the refined structure is reported. The agreement factors are: Rwp
(not corrected for background) = 6.60%, Rp (corrected for back-
ground) = 16.8%, RBragg = 11.2%.
pattern of 3 differs from the one reported for the previously
suggested K2Zn3(BH4)8 composition,[22] which has not been
observed in this study. The samples milled at different
KBH4/ZnCl2 ratios have also been investigated by 11B MAS
NMR spectroscopy, which reveals two boron-containing
phases: KBH4 [δiso(11B) = –37.8 ppm], and 3 [δiso(11B) =
–42.0 ppm]. The shift towards lower frequency for 3 sug-
–
gests that the BH4 ions are coordinated by Zn2+ ions.
Raman spectroscopic study was performed using a Renishaw InVia
Reflex, using a 488 nm excitation laser, with a power of about
2 mW on the sample. An Instec HCS621V cell was used for inert
sample transfer and measurement.
However, we have so far not been successful in solving the
structure of 3. Compound 3 appears to decompose in two
steps between 120 and 350 °C, which is significantly lower
than for KBH4. This indicates that 3 may be another new
zinc-based borohydride.
Solid-state 11B MAS NMR spectra were recorded with Varian
Unity-INOVA-300 (7.05 T) and -400 (9.39 T) spectrometers by
using homebuilt X-[1H] double-resonance MAS NMR probes for
5 mm o.d. rotors. The NMR experiments were performed at ambi-
ent temperatures by using air-tight end-capped zirconia rotors
packed with the sample in an argon-filled glove box. The 11B iso-
tropic chemical shifts are in ppm relative to neat F3B·O(CH2CH3)2.
Simulations of the MAS NMR spectra were performed by using
the STARS software package.[20]
Conclusions
The first mixed-anion and mixed-cation borohydride,
KZn(BH4)Cl2, has been synthesized and characterized
along with two other new zinc-based borohydrides. The sig-
nificant structural diversity of homoleptic (homoligand)
complex anions, such as [Sc(BH4)4]–, [Zn2(BH4)5]–, and
[Zn(BH4)3]nn–, recently found in the mixed alkali and d-
block metal borohydrides,[5,6,8,10] is complemented now by
the first heteroleptic complex anion [Zn(BH4)Cl2]–. Various
modifications of the coordination sphere for the transition
element is an additional factor enabling adjustment of the
stability of similar heteroleptic structures. Thus, the ad-
dition of metal halides to borohydrides may open a route
for the design and preparation of new hydrogen storage ma-
terials, potentially with improved thermodynamic and ki-
netic properties for hydrogen release and uptake.
Simultaneous thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential
scanning calorimetry (DSC) were performed, and the decomposi-
tion temperatures were measured as the onset temperatures ob-
served by DSC [heating rate 10 °C/min, room temp. to 500 °C, he-
lium flow: 50 mL/min (protective flow: 25 mL/min), corundum cru-
cibles].
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental details, crystallographic information, Raman
spectrum, details on the thermal expansion of 1, TGA/DSC curve
and XRD pattern for the compound 3.
Acknowledgments
Experimental Section
The authors are grateful to the Swiss-Norwegian Beam Lines for
the provision of in-house beam time. We are also grateful to Dr.
Hans Hagemann, Department of Physical Chemistry, University of
Geneva, for helpful discussions. We thank the Danish Council for
Strategic Research via Centre for Energy Materials, CEM for fund-
ing, the Danish Natural Science Research Councils for funding to
the Instrument Centre for Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy and
DanScatt.
The samples were prepared from KBH4 and ZnCl2 mixed in the
molar ratios 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 4:1. All samples were ball-milled un-
der argon for 120 min by using a sample/ball ratio of approximately
1:35. The chemicals used were KBH4 (Ն90%, Aldrich) and ZnCl2
(Ն98%, Aldrich). All handling and manipulation of the chemicals
were performed in an argon-filled glove box with a circulation puri-
fier, p(O2, H2O) Ͻ 0.1 ppm.
All samples were initially investigated by powder X-ray diffraction
with a Stoe diffractometer and a curved position sensitive detector
[Ge(111) monochromator, Cu-Kα1, λ = 1.54060 Å and 0.4 mm glass
capillaries sealed with glue used as sample holders]. Subsequently,
synchrotron radiation powder X-ray diffraction (SR-PXD) data
were collected at beamline BM01A at the European Synchrotron
Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France by using an MAR345 detec-
[1] L. Schlapbach, A. Züttel, Nature 2001, 414, 353–358.
[2] Y. Filinchuk, D. Chernyshov, V. Dmitriev, Z. Kristallogr. 2008,
223, 649–659.
[3] S. Orimo, Y. Nakamori, J. R. Eliseo, A. Züttel, C. M. Jensen,
Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4111–4132.
[4] J. J. Vajo, S. L. Skeith, F. J. Mertens, Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109,
3719–3722.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 1608–1612
© 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
1611