162113-3
Cheong et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 162113 ͑2007͒
FIG. 3. ͑Color online͒ Typical Fowler-Nordheim ͑FN͒ tunneling plots as a
function of temperature. Five linear portions of the plots are labeled as A, B,
C, D, and E as the applied electric field increases. Four different ledges of
the plots are indicated as I, II, III, and IV. Filled circle in the A linear portion
͑293 K͒ is fitted with a slope of 1.89ϫ107 V/cm and it corresponds to
effective barrier height ⌽B of 0.99 eV. The distribution of ⌽B as a function
of temperature is presented in the inset of the figure.
FIG. 4. Relationship among temperature, electric field, and current conduc-
tion mechanism through atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3 gate on n-type 4H
SiC. The abbreviations FN, PF, TFL, SE, Child’s, and Ohm’s represent
Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, Poole-Frenkel emission, trap-filled limited,
Schottky emission, Child’s law, and Ohm’s law conduction processes. Ar-
row indicates the possible region where current conduction is dominated by
SE.
emission͒, assuming that the trap centers are donorlike.
When higher E is applied, either PF or FN will dominate the
conduction mechanism until the injection and emission of
electrons is in equilibrium, so that another ledge will be re-
corded. These combination leakage paths can be considered
as trap-assisted tunneling with the trap centers located dis-
cretely at four different energy levels in the dielectric.9
Besides the above-mentioned conduction mechanisms,
SE has also been evaluated in this sample. From the linear
portion of the SE plot ͑ln͑J/T2͒ vs E1/2͒, ⌽B and r, as a
function of T, are obtained ͑not shown͒.5 The calculated ⌽B
value ranges from 1.08 eV at 293 K down to 0.83 eV at
413 K. This result is comparable with those shown in the
tion mechanisms depended on applied electric field and tem-
perature.
One of the authors ͑K.Y.C.͒ would like to acknowledge
the support of The Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia,
through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme ͑FRGS͒.
1L. A. Lipkin and J. Palmour, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 46, 525
͑1999͒.
2J. H. Moon, D. I. Eom, S. Y. No, H. K. Song, J. H. Yim, H. J. Na, J. B.
Lee, and H. J. Kim, Mater. Sci. Forum 527–529, 1083 ͑2006͒.
3V. V. Afanas’ev, A. Stesmans, F. Chen, S. A. Campbell, and R. Smith,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 922 ͑2003͒.
4C. M. Tanner, J. P. Choi, and J. P. Chang, Mater. Sci. Forum 527–529,
1071 ͑2006͒; 527–529, 1075 ͑2006͒.
inset of Fig. 3. However, the value is extremely low at
r
5S. W. Huang and J. G. Hwu, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 51, 1877
͑2004͒.
293 K ͑r=1.2͒ and the value approaches 5 as the tempera-
6A. Paskaleva, R. R. Ciechonski, M. Syvájárvi, E. Atanassova, and R.
Yakimova, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 124507 ͑2005͒.
ture increases. Since the value is not self-consistent with
r
temperature, SE is not a dominated current conduction
mechanism within the investigated E and T. However, there
is a strong indication that beyond the investigated tempera-
ture, this type of conduction mechanism may appear. Figure
4 demonstrates the summary results of current conduction
mechanisms as a function of E and T, including the proposed
SE mechanism, of this gate oxide. It is obvious that in the
figure there is still some region with unknown current con-
duction mechanism, so further investigation is required.
In this letter, analysis of current conduction mechanism
in an atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3 gate on n-type 4H SiC
has been systematically performed and reported. The con-
firmed conduction mechanisms consisted of SCL, PF emis-
sion, and combination of PF emission and FN tunneling.
Another possible leakage path that has been proposed was
Schottky emission. The dominance of these current conduc-
7H. R. Lazar, V. Misra, R. S. Johson, and G. Lucovsky, Appl. Phys. Lett.
79, 973 ͑2001͒.
8K. Y. Cheong, J. H. Moon, D. Eom, H. J. Kim, W. Bahng, and N.-K. Kim,
Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 10, H69 ͑2007͒.
9K. Y. Cheong, W. Bahng, and N.-K. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 212102
͑2005͒.
10S. Y. No, D. Eom, C. S. Hwang, and H. J. Kim, J. Electrochem. Soc. 153,
F87 ͑2006͒.
11K. Y. Cheong, S. Dimitrijev, J. Han, and H. B. Harrison, J. Appl. Phys.
93, 5682 ͑2003͒.
12M. A. Lampert and P. Mark, Current Injection in Solids ͑Academic, New
York, 1970͒.
13M. Wolborski, M. Bakowski, V. Pore, M. Ritala, M. Leskelä, A. Schöner,
and A. Hallén, Mater. Sci. Forum 483–485, 701 ͑2005͒.
14B. L. Yang, P. T. Lai, and H. Wong, Microelectron. Reliab. 44, 709
͑2004͒.
15K. Y. Gao, Th. Seyller, L. Ley, F. Ciobanu, G. Pensl, A. Tadich, J. D.
Riley, and R. G. C. Leckey, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 1830 ͑2003͒.
129.21.35.191 On: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 19:44:22