J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 [7] 1973–1976 (2005)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00248.x
ournal
J
Low Temperature Chemical Vapor Deposition of Aluminosilicate Thin
Films on Carbon Fibers
Vernal N. Richards, Jason K. Vohs, and Bradley D. Fahlmanw
Department of Chemistry, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859
Geoffrey L. Williams
Department of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859
We report the deposition of aluminum oxide and aluminosilicate
thin films onto carbon fiber substrates, at temperatures of 2001
and 2501C, respectively. For aluminosilicate films, the Al/Si ra-
tio of the resultant film varied concomitantly with the compo-
sition of the liquid precursor mixture. The growth rate for the
aluminosilicate films, systems utilizing one or two precursors
have been used; the first single-source precursor was the mono-
siloxide complex, Al(O Pr) (OSiMe ). However, the use of this
i
6
2
3
precursor required temperatures exceeding 9001C in order to get
films with an even distribution of aluminum and silicon. Al-
though attempts have been made to control Al:Si ratios in alu-
minosilicate films, such stoichiometric control remains difficult
˚
oxide films was 15–17 A/min, comparable with other methods
carried out at higher temperatures. Cross-section SEM images
indicate that the deposited films are conformal, following the
complex topography of the carbon fiber substrate. Preliminary
gas-phase IR analysis suggests that the coatings decompose the
nerve agent simulant dimethyl methylphosphonate at tempera-
tures as low as 351C, suggesting the utility of the reported
methodology for the design/fabrication of actively protective
fabrics and clothing.
7
to control, for both single-source and dual-source systems.
II. Results and Discussion
Our CVD system for the growth of aluminum oxide and alu-
minosilicate films featured the controlled hydrolysis of water-
sensitive precursor liquids. To prevent extensive gas-phase reac-
tions and a granular coating, water and precursor vapors were
introduced through separate tubes, and allowed to come into
I. Introduction
contact only in the immediate vicinity of the substrate (Fig. 1).
ITH the constant threat of terrorist attacks, much attention
has been focused on the development of materials that
i
Al( OPr)]
For aluminum oxide films, a volatile precursor, [Me
2
2
,
W
was used alone; for aluminosilicate films, tetraethoxysilane was
added to the above aluminum-containing liquid. It should be
will protect both military personnel and civilians against the re-
lease of chemical and biological warfare agents. Solid metal ox-
ides, such as aluminum oxide, have been shown to adsorb and
decompose organophosphorus-based chemicals at temperatures
1
13
noted that both H and C NMR confirmed that the simple
physical mixing of aluminum and silicon liquids did not result in
reaction by-products, only a homogeneous one-phase solution.
The effective deposition temperature for aluminosilicate and
alumina thin films was found to be substrate-dependent. On Si
1
not far removed from ambient. The deposition of thin films of
these materials onto substrates such as clothing fibers and fab-
rics would represent an intriguing utility for actively protective
clothing, for both military and civilian use. For the deposition
of coatings onto thermally sensitive substrates with such com-
plex topography, it is imperative to have a low-temperature
method that is still able to produce conformal thin films. The
ultimate methodology would further enable one to control
the stoichiometry of the growing film. To this end, we report
the low-temperature deposition of conformal aluminum oxide
and aluminosilicate thin films on carbon fiber substrates, with
facile control over Al:Si ratios for the latter films. Our temper-
atures represent the lowest-reported temperatures to date, al-
lowing other possible applications for temperature-sensitive
substrates.
(
100), the lowest temperatures yielding a homogeneous coating
of aluminum oxide and aluminosilicate were 1251 and 2001C,
respectively (Fig. 2). However, when carbon fibers were used as
substrates, no observable coating was observed at temperatures
below 2001 and 2501C for aluminum oxide and aluminosilicate,
respectively. These values indicate that a higher temperature is
required for the migration/nucleation of surface species over the
complex topography of an irregular carbon fiber, relative to a
silicon wafer. The increased thermal conductivity of Si (100)
relative to carbon would also explain the increased migratory
efficiency of intermediates at lower temperature on silicon, caus-
ing nucleation and growth of films at lower temperatures. The
temperature regime used in our system is far below the reported
deposition temperature (5001–6001C) for low-pressure chemical
vapor deposition (LPCVD) using the above aluminum pre-
Common precursors used for the chemical vapor deposition
2
3
4
(
CVD) of Al O films include AlCl , AlMe , Al(acac) , and
2 3 3 3 3
5
various aluminum alkoxides. Alkoxides are the precursors
of choice, producing films with little carbon incorporation at
low temperatures even in the absence of an oxidizing gas. For
8
9,10
cursor alone or associated with metal acetylacetonates.
To our knowledge, our study also represents the first use of
[
i
2 2
Me Al( OPr)] for atmospheric-pressure chemical vapor deposi-
tion (APCVD) growth of aluminum oxide-containing films,
allowing for facile industrial scale-up relative to LPCVD
techniques.
L. C. Klein—contributing editor
The aluminosilicate films grown on the carbon fiber are con-
formal, perfectly following the rough terrain of the fiber surface
(Fig. 3). Because of the low temperatures used for deposition,
the as-deposited films are amorphous, confirmed by powder
X-ray diffraction. Auger spectroscopy suggests that the alumi-
Manuscript No. 11255. Received August 6, 2004; approved November 9, 2004.
Supported by the State of Michigan and Central Michigan University by a Research
Excellence Fund award for this and continuing work. Also supported by Dendritic Nano-
technologies and the Department of Defense (Army Research Laboratory).
w
1
973