Q.-Z. Zhai / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 71 (2008) 332–335
335
Here, Zr(IV) first reacts with DBS-ASA to produce
Zr(C22H11AsBr2N4O14S3) product. Then, H2C2O4 replaces the
C22H11AsBr2N4O14S3 intheZr(C22H11AsBr2N4O14S3)topro-
duce Zr(C2O4)2. The reason, why the replacement reaction takes
place, was that the stability constant of Zr(C2O4)2 is expected
to be larger than the one of Zr(C22H11AsBr2N4O14S3).
From the table it can be seen that the analytical results of the
present method were in excellent agreement with those by oxalic
acid-rhodamine B-potassium dichromate catalytic kinetic spec-
trophotometry [5]. The relative standard deviation of six parallel
determinations for the samples and recovery were 1.27–2.14%
and 99.2–99.6%, respectively. The mean relative standard devi-
ation and mean recovery were 1.71% and 99.45%, respectively.
The analytical results obtained were quite satisfactory.
2.8. Calibration curve
Under the optimum experimental conditions, a linear rela-
tionship was shown over the concentration range of 9.0 × 10−6
to 5.0 × 10−4 M for oxalic acid. The regression equation for
calibration graph was: A = 3.30 × 102 C + 0.0884 (C:M), with a
correlation coefficient 0.9995, and the apparent molar absorp-
present method was evaluated by determining 2.0 × 10−4 M
oxalic acid standard solution 11 times with a relative stan-
dard deviation of 0.98%. The limit of detection as defined by
IUPAC [11] and the limit of quantification [12] were found to
be 0.815 g/mL and 2.39 g/mL, respectively.
4. Comparison with other methods
A comparison of the present procedure with other methods
is listed in Table 2. From the table it can be seen that the present
method has the advantages of operation simplicity, rapidity and
low analytical cost. The method possesses distinct advantages
over existing methods with respect to sensitivity, selectivity,
speed, accuracy, precision and ease of operation. It has much
more practical value for the determination of trace oxalic acid.
5. Conclusions
2.9. Interference study
A new spectrophotometric method for the determina-
tion of trace amount of oxalic acid was proposed with
Zr(IV)–(DBS-arsenazo) complex in this paper. The linear range
of determination of oxalic acid is 9.0 × 10−6 M to 5.0 × 10−4 M.
The detection limit of the present method for oxalic acid is
0.815 g/mL. The proposed method has been applied to the
determination of oxalic acid in tomato samples with satisfactory
results. The present procedure has the advantages of the oper-
ation simplicity, rapidity and low analytical cost. It is simple,
highly sensitive, free from interference of common ions and has
much more practical value for the determination of trace oxalic
acid compared with other methods [2–9].
The effect of a series of 54 diverse inorganic and organic
substances on the determination of 2.0 × 10−4 M oxalic acid
was checked. The tolerance limits (mass multiple, m/m) of the
common ions tested (causing < 5% relative error) are summa-
rized as follows: K+ (700); Na+ (500); Li+ (400); NH4 (100);
+
Ag+ (0.03); Mn2+ (400); Fe2+ (40); Cu2+ (4); Cd2+, Sn2+ (1);
Ba2+, Ni2+ (0.3); Zn2+, Co2+ (0.2); Ca2+, Mg2+ (0.05); Pb2+
(0.007); Al3+ (400); Fe3+ (5); Cr3+ (0.8); Bi3+ (0.2); Y3+ (0.07);
La3+ (0.05); Th4+ (0.005); Br−, I−, NO3− (100); F−, NO2− (5);
−
−
−
−
VO3 (0.4); WO4 (0.1); BrO3 (0.007); MnO4 (0.0005);
SO4 (100); S2O7 (4); Cr2O72−, SiO3 (2); PO4 (8);
Mo7O246− (0.07); EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid) (8);
citric acid, urea (500); glucose (400); ascorbic acid (70); lysine,
alanine (7); acetic acid, leucine, serum albumin (5); glycocoll,
bovine red albumin (4); tartaric acid, malic acid (2); salicylic
acid (1).
2−
2−
2−
3−
References
[1] M.Y. Leng, General Chemistry, Press of Wuhan University of Technology,
Wuhan, 1993, p. 268.
[2] G.J. Wang, Y. Lv, J.F. Wang, Environ. Monit. China 17 (2001) 36.
[3] A.L. Allan, B.S.F. Band, E. Rubio, Microchem. J. 34 (1986) 51.
[4] F. Salinas, J.L. Martinez, V. Gonzalez, Analyst 114 (1989) 1685.
[5] Q.Z. Zhai, X.X. Zhang, Q.Z. Liu, Spectrochim. Acta Part A 65 (2006) 1.
[6] Q.F. Zhou, Y. Wu, Q. Wang, Phys. Test. Chem. Anal. Part B 33 (1997)
352.
[7] M.A. Chamjangal, V. Keley, G. Bagherian, Anal. Sci. 22 (2006) 333.
[8] L.P. Long, Chin. J. Anal. Lab. 21 (2002) 80.
[9] S.L. Feng, B. Li, J. Fan, Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 25 (1997) 1274.
[10] Q.Y. Luo, Z.H. Lei, X.M. Yu, Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 12 (1984) 985.
[11] G.L. Long, J.D. Winefordner, Anal. Chem. 55 (1983) 712A.
[12] G.L. Long, J.D. Winefordner, Anal. Chem. 52 (1980) 2242.
3. Applications
The applicability of the proposed method has been checked in
two tomato samples. A 50.0000 g of tomato sample was soaked
for 30 min with 250 mL of boiling water at 100 ◦C in a beaker.
After the solution was cooled, it was filtered three times and
transferred into a 250-mL calibrated flask. An aliquot of the
above testing solution was placed into a 10-mL calibrated flask
and then the content of oxalic acid was determined according to