RESEARCH
| REPORT
b-alkoxide function and organomagnesium
reagents play a notable stereodetermining
role in these 1,2-addition reactions. Control-
ling this aspect of the process to selectively
access b-D–configured NAs will be the sub-
ject of future studies. In this study, a col-
lection of deazaadenine-substituted NAs 43
to 47 were readily accessed as both a- and
b-anomers. In general, and as noted in Fig. 3,
base-promoted cyclizations resulted in C3′-OH–
and C5′-OH–protected NAs (e.g., 49 to 54),
whereas Lewis acid–promoted cyclizations re-
sulted in deprotection or protecting group
migration (e.g., 44 and 47). Densely function-
alized L-configured C4′-modified NAs could
be rapidly accessed from the corresponding
ketofluorohydrin aldol adducts, including NAs
substituted with methyl, cyclopropyl, aryl, and
alkynyl groups (Fig. 4). From this study, it is
clear that larger collections of C4′-modified
NAs (e.g., focused screening libraries) are now
readily available. It is worth highlighting
that each of the C4′-methyl, cyclopropyl, p-
methoxyphenyl, p-chlorophenyl, and alkynyl
NAs 43 to 54 were prepared in only three
or four steps total, which compares favorably
to contemporary syntheses.
Considering the potential for this process
to affect the large-scale production of NAs, we
examined the synthesis of the D-uridine de-
rivative 56 starting with 900 g of uracil. With-
out additional optimization, we were able to
generate ~380 g of the aldol adduct 55 (Fig.
2B), which was converted into the protected
uridine 56 in excellent yield. Oxidation of
the C2′-OH function followed by deprotection
and addition of MeMgBr in THF gave the
tertiary alcohol 57. This later compound is a
previously reported intermediate in the large-
scale production of MK-3682 (uprifosbuvir: 58)
(33), an HCV NS5B RNA polymerase inhib-
itor developed for the treatment of hepatitis C
virus (HCV).
We also briefly assessed the utility of this
process for accessing an unusual class of NAs
known as iminonucleosides, wherein the fura-
nose oxygen is replaced by a nitrogen atom. In
a single example (Fig. 4C), we observed that
reductive amination of the fluorohydrin aldol
adduct 59 (isolated as a single diastereomer,
as shown) using benzyl amine and followed
by a basic work-up led directly to the b-D–
configured iminonucleoside 60 in good yield.
To further demonstrate the advantages of
this strategy, we prepared a C4′-modified
deoxy NA (Fig. 4D). In this case, C4′-allyl ri-
bothymidine 61 was accessed through the
addition of allylmagnesium bromide to the
fluorohydrin 59 followed by base-promoted
AFD. A Barton-McCombie deoxygenation then
gave the C4′-allyl NA 62 in only six steps from
thymine.
of locked nucleic acids (LNAs) (34). These
conformationally restricted NAs demonstrate
improved stability, and their incorporation
in antisense oligonucleotides can lead to sub-
stantial increases in specificity and potency.
We evaluated the addition of alkynylmagne-
sium chloride to the thymine-containing aldol
adduct 59 and found that the reaction gave
two diastereomeric addition products 63 and
64. The major product was transformed di-
rectly into the unusual LNA 65 by simply
reacting with NaOH, which promoted both
the AFD reaction and a subsequent cyclization
between the free alcohol function and alkyne.
This four-step total synthesis is comparable
to the 23-step route reported for the analo-
gous uracil LNA 67 (35). We were also able
to generate the unusual alkyne-functionalized
LNA 68, an unreported scaffold in nucleo-
side chemistry, by simply effecting an AFD
of the 1,2-addition product 64. From here,
formation of the 2,2′-anhydrothymidine fol-
lowed by deprotection and treatment with
base in warm DMF (36) gave the LNA 68. This
scaffold is primed for further diversification
through standard click or Sonagashira cou-
pling reactions.
The demonstration of several aFARs on
scales >10 g and up to 400 g supports the
use of this strategy in the process scale pro-
duction of NAs. Several generations of medi-
cinal chemistry and total synthesis have
provided reliable templates for nucleoside
and NA synthesis; however, this study pro-
vides opportunities that should influence the
construction of diversity libraries and support
future efforts in both drug discovery and
development.
17. P. Merino, Ed., Chemical Synthesis of Nucleoside Analogues
(Wiley, 2013).
18. M. Brodszki et al., Org. Process Res. Dev. 15, 1027–1032
(2011).
19. M. McLaughlin et al., Org. Lett. 19, 926–929 (2017).
20. K. R. Campos et al., Science 363, eaat0805 (2019).
21. M. Peifer, R. Berger, V. W. Shurtleff, J. C. Conrad,
D. W. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 5900–5903
(2014).
22. J. S. Teichert, F. M. Kruse, O. Trapp, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58,
9944–9947 (2019).
23. M. Bergeron-Brlek, T. Teoh, R. Britton, Org. Lett. 15,
3554–3557 (2013).
24. C. Grondal, D. Enders, Adv. Synth. Catal. 349, 694–702
(2007).
25. W. Ren et al., Nat. Commun. 9, 3243 (2018).
26. A. Quintard, J. Rodriguez, ACS Catal. 7, 5513–5517
(2017).
27. R. Britton, B. Kang, Nat. Prod. Rep. 30, 227–236
(2013).
28. F. A. Davis, P. V. N. Kasu, G. Sundarababu, H. Qi, J. Org. Chem.
62, 7546–7547 (1997).
29. D. D. Steiner, N. Mase, C. F. Barbas 3rd, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
44, 3706–3710 (2005).
30. E. M. Sánchez-Fernández et al., Chem. Eur. J. 18, 8527–8539
(2012).
31. T. C. Britton, M. E. LeTourneau, Process for Anomerizing
Nucleosides, U.S. Patent 5,420,266A (1995).
32. E. De Clercq, J. Med. Chem. 59, 2301–2311 (2016).
33. A. M. Hyde, R. Calabria, R. Arvary, X. Wang, A. Klapars,
Org. Process Res. Dev. 23, 1860–1871 (2019).
34. M. A. Campbell, J. Wengel, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 5680–5689
(2011).
35. P. P. Seth, E. E. Swayze, 6-Disubstituted or Unsaturated
Bicyclic Nucleic Acid Analogs, U.S. Patent 8278283 B2
(2008).
36. T. Yamaguchi, M. Horiba, S. Obika, Chem. Commun. 51,
9737–9740 (2015).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank D. McKearney (Simon Fraser University) and
J. A. Newman (Merck & Co., Inc.) for carrying out x-ray
crystallographic analyses. Funding: R.B. acknowledges support
from the Canadian Glycomics Network (Strategic Initiatives
Grant, CD-46), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council (NSERC) of Canada (Discovery Grant, RGPIN-2019-
06468), and Merck & Co., Inc. M.M. was supported by an NSERC
CGSD2 scholarship, and J.L. was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). Author contributions: M.M.
and S.M.S. developed the methodology; M.M., S.M.S., J.L.,
B.A., and Y.W. performed the experiments; R.C. developed a
protocol for assigning stereochemistry by nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) spectroscopic and computational methods;
L.-C.C. and R.B. were responsible for project administration;
R.B. conceptualized the research; L.-C.C. and R.B. supervised
the execution of experiments; and R.B. wrote the original
draft. Competing interests: Simon Fraser University and
Merck & Co., Inc. have filed a patent application describing
the synthesis of nucleoside analogs via the process presented
in this manuscript—U.S. provisional patent application
no. 62/994,349. Data and materials availability: All data
are available in the manuscript or the supplementary
materials. X-ray structures are deposited at the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre under reference numbers 1955427,
2008890, and 1955420.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. G. M. Blackburn, M. J. Gait, D. Loakes, D. M. Williams, Eds.,
Nucleic Acids in Chemistry and Biology (Royal Society of
Chemistry Publishing, 2006).
2. C. M. Galmarini, J. R. Mackey, C. Dumontet, Lancet Oncol. 3,
415–424 (2002).
3. E. De Clercq, Med. Res. Rev. 33, 1215–1248 (2013).
4. L. P. Jordheim, D. Durantel, F. Zoulim, C. Dumontet,
Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 447–464 (2013).
5. J. Shelton et al., Chem. Rev. 116, 14379–14455
(2016).
6. B. Ewald, D. Sampath, W. Plunkett, Oncogene 27, 6522–6537
(2008).
7. K. L. Seley-Radtke, M. K. Yates, Antiviral Res. 154, 66–86
(2018).
8. M. K. Yates, K. L. Seley-Radtke, Antiviral Res. 162, 5–21
(2019).
9. H. Ma et al., J. Biol. Chem. 282, 29812–29820 (2007).
10. E. P. Gillis, K. J. Eastman, M. D. Hill, D. J. Donnelly,
N. A. Meanwell, J. Med. Chem. 58, 8315–8359 (2015).
11. H. Ohrui, Chem. Rec. 6, 133–143 (2006).
12. J. T. Witkowski, R. K. Robins, R. W. Sidwell, L. N. Simon, J. Med.
Chem. 15, 1150–1154 (1972).
13. J. Zeidler, D. Baraniak, T. Ostrowski, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 97,
409–418 (2015).
14. G. Ni et al., RSC Advances 9, 14302–14320 (2019).
15. G. Gumina, G. Y. Song, C. K. Chu, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 202,
9–15 (2001).
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S14
Tables S1 to S12
Liquid Chromatography Chromatograms
NMR Data
References (37–52)
MDAR Reproducibility Checklist
Finally, we aimed to exploit this facile C4′-
functionalization strategy in the preparation
16. H. Cui et al., J. Med. Chem. 55, 10948–10957
(2012).
15 February 2020; accepted 5 June 2020
10.1126/science.abb3231
Meanwell et al., Science 369, 725–730 (2020)
7 August 2020
6 of 6