C. D. McTiernan, M. Chahma / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 5483–5485
5485
In the case of thymine both N1 and N3 can act as weak acids and
References and notes
can be deprotonated. Looking at the pKa’s of thymine, N1 will lose
its proton at a lower whereas N3 will lose its proton when the
media becomes more basic. It is through the N1 position that thy-
mine associates with its sugar in DNA, therefore it is at this posi-
tion we wish to substitute the thiophene monomer. The fact that
we obtained the N3-linked thiophene when using NaH as the base
for deprotonation and the N1-linked thiophene when using K2CO3
as the base for deprotonation relates back to the strength of these
bases. Of the two bases used, NaH is the stronger one. Therefore by
using the K2CO3 we were able to selectively deprotonate the thy-
mine molecule at N1.
Attempts to polymerize the prepared monomers via electro-
chemical oxidation in ACN and DMF using cyclic voltammetry at
the platinum electrode were unsuccessful. The electropolymeriza-
tion process to form a carbon–carbon bond via radical cation–rad-
ical cation coupling was not able to occur due to the high oxidation
peak potential of these monomers (the oxidation peak potential is
outside the potential window of the solvent/supporting electro-
lyte). The alternative to the electrochemical polymerization is the
chemical oxidation using either FeCl3 (Ferric chloride) or NOBF4
(Nitronium tetrafluoroborate) as oxidizing agent. Most of these
chemical polymerizations are carried out in chloride solvents such
as chloroform and dichloromethane. Due to the poor solubility of
the prepared monomers 1–3 in these solvents, it is very hard to
have a clear cut statement regarding their chemical polymeriza-
tions. Further investigations concerning the synthesis of (i) terthi-
ophenes bearing nucleobases with low oxidation potential (I) and
(ii) new monothiophenes (II) with enhanced solubility, are cur-
rently underway and will be published in due course.
1. (a) Ban, C.; Chung, S.; Park, D.-S.; Shim, Y.-B. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1–8; (b)
Lee, T.-Y.; Shim, Y.-B. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 5629–5632; (c) Higgins, S. J.;
Mouffouk, F.; Brown, S. J.; Sedghi, N.; Eccleston, B.; Reeman, S. Mater. Res. Soc.
Symp. Proc. 2005, 871E, I1.3.1–I1.3.5; (d) Mouffouk, F.; Higgins, S. J.; Brown, S. J.;
Sedghi, N.; Eccleston, B.; Reeman, S. Chem. Commun. 2004, 20, 2314–2315; (e)
Shuhmann, W.. In Enzyme and Microbial Biosensors Techniques and Protocols;
Humana Press: New Jersey, 1998; Vol. 6, pp 143–156; (f) Kim, H.-J.; Lee, K.-P.;
Gopalan, A. I.; Oh, S.-H.; Woo, J.-C. Ultramicroscopy 2008, 108, 1360–1364; (g)
Uygun, A. Talanta 2009, 79, 194–198.
2. (a) Ren, X.; Xu, Q.-H. Langmuir 2009, 25, 43–47; (b) Gaylord, B. S.; Heeger, A. J.;
Bazan, G. C. PNAS 2002, 99, 10954–10957.
3. Pu, K.-Y.; Liu, B. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 1067–1073.
4. Mouffouk, F.; Brown, S. J.; Demetriou, A. M.; Higgins, S. J.; Nichols, R. J.;
Rajapakse, R. M. G.; Reeman, S. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 1186–1196.
5. (a) Emge, A.; Bäuerle, P. Synth. Met. 1999, 102, 1370–1373; (b) Bäurle, P.; Emge,
A. Adv. Mater. 1998, 3, 324–330.
6. Navacchia, M. L.; Favaretto, L.; Treossi, E.; Palermo, V.; Barbarella, G. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2010, 31, 351–355.
7. (a) Zeng, C.-C.; Zheng, Q.-Y.; Tang, Y.-L.; Huang, Z.-T. Tetrahedron 2003, 59,
2539–2548; (b) Dueholm, K. L.; Egholm, M.; Berhens, C.; Christensen, L.;
Hansen, L. F.; Vulpius, T.; Petersen, K. H.; Berg, R. H.; Nielsen, P. E.; Buchardt, O.
J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5767–5773.
8. Behroozi, S. J.; Mandal, B. K. Synth. Met. 1999, 107, 93–96.
9. Synthesis of 2-(6-amino-purin-9-yl)-1-thiophen-3-yl-ethanone (1). Adenine
(0.132 g, 0.975 mmol) and sodium hydride (NaH) (0.045 g, 1.87 mmol) were
added to 10 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF), which had been dried over 4 A°
molecular sieves and degassed for 1 h with N2. The reaction mixture was
allowed to stir for 2–3 h, at this point the adenine had been deprotonated and a
white precipitate had formed. Compound 4 (0.209 g, 1.00 mmol) was then
introduced to the flask. Immediately upon the addition of 4, the precipitate
disappeared and the reaction mixture became a light yellow. As the reaction
progressed the reaction mixture transitioned from yellow to orange and then to
red, once 4 had been consumed (ca. 45 min.). The DMF was then removed
under vacuum, and the desired product was obtained as a white solid after
recrystalization from a 50/50 mixture of water and ethanol. Yield = 68%. 1H
NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 4.85 (s, 2H), 6.36 (s, 2H), 6.71 (m, 1H), 6.85 (m,
1H) 7.21 (s, 2H) 7.90 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 50.0, 118.5,
126.6, 128.3, 134.9, 138.9, 141.8, 150.1, 152.6, 156.2, 187.5. IR t
(cmÀ1) = 1676
(CO). UV–vis (ACN), kmax
C
(e
) = 256 nm (4.96 Â 104 MÀ1 cmÀ1). HRMS (EI) for
DNA base
11H9N5OS [M+]: calcd 259.0522; found 259.0524.
O
DNA base
(CH2)2
O
10. Synthesis of 5-methyl-3-(2-oxo-2-thiophen-3-yl-ethyl)-1H-pyrimidine-2,4-dione
(2). Thymine (0.126 g, 1.00 mmol) and NaH (0.0245 g, 1.02 mmol) were added
to 10 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF), which had been dried over 4 A°
molecular sieves and degassed for 1 h with N2. The reaction mixture was
allowed to stir for 2–3 h, at this point the thymine had been deprotonated and
a white precipitate had formed. Compound 4 (0.209 g, 1.00 mmol) was then
introduced to the flask. Immediately upon the addition of 4, the precipitate
disappeared and the reaction mixture became a light yellow. As the reaction
progressed the reaction mixture transitioned from yellow to orange and then
to red, once 4 had been consumed (ca. 1–2 h). The DMF was then removed
under vacuum, and the desired product was obtained as a white solid after
recrystallization from a 50/50 mixture of water and ethanol. Yield = 40%. 1H
NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 0.92 (s, 3H), 4.30 (s, 2H), 6.63 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1H),
6.72 (m, 1H), 6.86 (m, 1H), 7.84 (m, 1H), 10.52 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz,
DMSO-d6): d 17.1, 59.0, 113.5, 131.5, 133.2, 139.8, 144.1, 147.26, 156.3, 169.6,
S
S
S
S
I
II
In summary, we have explored the synthesis of a series of new
thiophene monomers bearing the nucleobases adenine and thy-
mine. These new compounds were fully characterized with differ-
ent spectroscopic techniques and they are stable in air and in the
presence of a variety of organic solvents. We have also shown by
exploiting the pKa’s of the various amine groups of the nucleobases
it is possible to selectively deprotonate and functionalize a specific
amino group by using bases of varying strengths such as sodium
hydride and potassium carbonate. The use of thiophenes substi-
tuted with an acetyl bromide functionality shows a great promise
for nucleobase functionalization of a variety of thiophene mono-
mers, which can be chemically/electrochemically oxidized to form
the corresponding polymers.
192.9.
IR
t
(cmÀ1) = 1680
(CO).
UV–vis
(ACN),
kmax(e) = 260 nm
(1.46 Â 104 MÀ1 cmÀ1). HRMS (EI) for C11H10N2OS [M+]: calcd 250.0407;
found 250.0407.
11. Synthesis of 5-methyl-1-(2-oxo-2-thiophen-3-yl-ethyl)-1H-pyrimidine-2,4-dione
(3). Thymine (0.125 g, 0.992 mmol) and potassium carbonate (K2CO3) (0.150 g,
1.09 mmol) were added to 10 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF), which had
been dried over 4 Å molecular sieves and degassed for 1 h with N2. The
reaction mixture was allowed to stir for 2–3 h, at this point the thymine had
been deprotonated and a white precipitate had formed. Compound 4 (0.208 g,
0.995 mmol) was then introduced to the flask. Immediately upon the addition
of 4, the precipitate disappeared and the reaction mixture became a light
yellow. As the reaction progressed the reaction mixture transitioned from
yellow to orange and then to red, once 4 had been consumed (ca. 1–2 h). The
DMF was then removed under vacuum, and the desired product was obtained
as a white solid after recrystalization from a 50/50 mixture of water and
ethanol. Yield = 70%. 1H NMR (200 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 2.43 (s, 3H), 5.85 (s, 2H),
8.20 (s, 1H), 8.28 (m, 1H), 8.42 (m, 1H), 9.41 (m, 1H), 12.1 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
(50 MHz, DMSO-d6): d 11.5, 53.8, 107.6, 125.8, 127.6, 134.1, 138.4, 141.6,
The ability of the nucleobase functionalized thiophene to form
hydrogen bonds with their complementary base could be exam-
ined, since this is the mechanism through which DNA hybridiza-
tion takes place and is the key principle behind the use of these
polymers in DNA biosensors.
150.6, 163.9, 187.3. IR t (e) = 261 nm
(cmÀ1) = 1680 (CO). UV–vis (CH2Cl2), kmax
(3.54 Â 104 MÀ1 cmÀ1). HRMS (EI) for C20H21NO3S3 [M+]: calcd 250.0407;
found 250.0411.
Acknowledgments
12. Thureau, P.; Ancian, B.; Viel, S.; Thévand, A. Chem. Commun. 2006, 17, 1884–
1886.
13. (a) Zimmer, S.; Biltonen, R. J. Solution Chem. 1972, 1, 291–298; (b) Nawrot, B.;
Michalak, O.; Olejniczak, S.; Wieczorek, M. W.; Lis, T.; Stec, W. J. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 3979–3985.
M.C. thanks the Laurentian University and the Natural Sciences
and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for support-
ing this work.