Effect of Medium on Rate and Mechanism
3
anism. We have recently shown that the amine nature
as follows. The k
ate T as shown in Scheme 1. Since MeCN cannot
1
process yields a zwitterionic intermedi-
(
is also an important factor, since the reaction of 1 with
various secondary amines (both cyclic and acyclic second-
ary amines) proceeds through the k
corresponding reaction with primary amines proceeds
without the k
Lee et al. have reported that the k
in the aminolysis of aryl dithiobenzoates (5) performed
in MeCN.4 The absence of the k
process has been
attributed to a greatly reduced mobility of proton in such
an aprotic solvent. However, the present aminolysis of
1
4
stabilize such an ionic species, the k
to be smaller in MeCN than in H O. In fact, the k
shown in Table S2 for the reactions run in MeCN is
slightly smaller than that for the reactions run in H
(except for the reaction with 1-formylpiperazine), al-
though the amines are more basic in MeCN than in H
units. On the other hand, the breakdown
1
value is expected
3
pathway while the
2
1
value
2
a
3
process regardless of the amine basicity.
2
O
3
pathway is absent
2
O
by ca. 7-9 pK
a
3
(
of the intermediate T to the reactants (the k-1 process)
4
(
would be faster in MeCN than in H
2
O, since T would
1
performed in MeCN proceeds through the k
3
pathway
be more unstable in the former medium. However, the
(
as mentioned in the preceding section. Therefore, one can
suggest that the reduced rate of proton transfer in MeCN
is not an important factor in determining the presence
medium effect on the rate of the decomposition of T to
-
T
3 2
(the k process) or to the products (the k process) is
expected to be insignificant, since both processes yield
(
or absence of the k
3
process. This argument can be further
another ionic species from the zwitterionic T . Therefore,
supported from the previous reports that aminolyses
the k
MeCN than in H
/k-1 and k /k-1 ratios have been determined to be much
smaller for the reactions performed in MeCN than for
those in H O.
3
Lee et al. have recently proposed that the k value
2
/k-1 and k
3
/k-1 ratios are expected to be smaller in
performed in various aprotic solvents including MeCN
2
O. In fact, as shown in Table S2, the
,10-12
proceed through the k
3
pathway.5
k
2
3
It is interesting that the aminolysis that proceeds
through the k pathway has a small k /k-1 ratio either
by deceasing the k value or by increasing the k-1 value.
The introduction of a poor leaving group as in the
2
3
2
2
+
would be diminished greatly in MeCN since the H
J encks’system7 decreases the k
a
value. Similarly, the
4a
mobility decreases in the aprotic solvent. Such a solvent
2
replacement of the CdO bond in the substrate by the
effect on the k
the k /k-1 ratio for the reacion run in MeCN. This
argument is consistent with the fact that the k /k-1 ratio
decreases much more significantly than the k /k-1 ratio
upon the medium change from H O to MeCN. Therefore,
one can suggest that the decreased k /k-1 ratio is the most
responsible contributor to the decreased reaction rate
upon the medium change from H O to MeCN. To the best
3
value would cause a further decrease in
CdS bond as in Castro’s system would also decrease the
3
-
k
2
value due to the decreased ability of C-S to form a
3
-
CdS bond compared with the ability of C-O to form a
2
3
CdO bond. On the other hand, the k
2
/k-1 ratio also can
2
be decreased by using weakly basic amines, since the k-1
value increases with decreasing amine basicity. Besides,
we have recently shown that the k-1 value is much larger
3
2
for the reactions of 1 with secondary amines than those
of our knowledge, the effect of medium on the microscopic
rate constants for ester aminolyses has never been
analyzed quantitatively.
with primary amines.2 As shown in Table S2, the k
a
/k-1
2
-
3
ratio is in the range of (4.90-31.7) × 10 and (6.58-
-
3
9
7.1) × 10 for the reactions run in MeCN and in H
2
O,
To investigate the effect of medium on rate and
H O
MeCN
respectively. These values are much smaller than those
reported in the literature for the reactions proceeding
basicity, the plot of log k
1
2
/k
1
vs ∆pK
a
has been
a
represent
H O
MeCN
constructed, in which k
the k values in H
the pK of the conjugate acid of amine in the two solvents
(i.e., ∆pK ) pK in MeCN - pK in H O), respectively.
1
2
, k
1
, and ∆pK
without the k
of 1 with various primary amines. Therefore, the small
/k-1 ratio is considered to be a common feature for the
3
pathway, i.e., ca. 1-25 for the reactions
1
2
O and in MeCN, and the difference in
2
a
a
k
2
a
a
a
2
aminolysis reaction that proceeds through the k
way.
3
path-
As shown in Figure S5 (Supporting Information), the plot
is linear with a slope of 0.30. One can also see a linear
H O
MeCN
-1)
/k-1) 2
/(k k /k
1 2
and
Figure S3 (Supporting Information), which is statisti-
correlation between log(k
1
k
2
cally corrected by using p and q,13 exhibits a linear
a
∆pK
with a slope of 0.62 (Figure S6 in the Supporting
Brønsted-type plot with a â
1
value of 0.45 for the
Information). The linearity shown in Figures S5 and S6
suggests that the effect of medium on the amine basicity
aminolysis of 1 performed in MeCN. A similar result has
been shown in the inset of Figure S3 for the correspond-
ing reactions performed in the aqueous medium with a
(∆pK
as well as the equilibrium (k
effect appears to be more significant on the basicity
(∆pK ) than on the k value or on the k /k-1 ratio, since
a
) is reflected in the effect of medium on the k
1
value
1
/k-1). However, the medium
â
1
value of 0.39. Figure S4 (Supporting Information)
demonstrates that the plot of log k /k-1 vs pK is also
linear for reactions performed both in MeCN and in H
2
a
a
1
1
O
the slopes of Figures S5 and S6 are much smaller than
unity.
2
with a -â-1 value of 0.29 and 0.39, respectively. Since
there is little difference in the âeq value for the reactions
In conclusion, we have found the following. (1) The
aminolysis of 1 proceeds through rate-limiting deproto-
in MeCN (âeq ) 0.74) and H O (âeq ) 0.78), one can
2
(
-
suggest that the effect of the medium on the structure of
the transition state is insignificant in the present ami-
nolysis.
2
nation from T to give T both in MeCN and in H O. (2)
(14) (a) Parker, A. J . Chem. Rev. 1969, 69, 1-32. (b) Buncel, E.;
Wilson, H. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1977, 14, 133-202. (c) Um, I. H.;
Buncel, E. J . Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 577-582. (d) Um, I. H.; Lee, E. J .;
Buncel, E. J . Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4859-4864. (e) Um, I. H.; Buncel,
E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11111-11112.
As mentioned in the preceding section, the reaction
performed in MeCN is much slower than that run in H
One can explain the effect of medium on the reaction rate
2
O.
(15) Spillane, W. J .; McGrath, P.; Brack, C.; O’Byrne, A. B. J . Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 6313-6316.
(16) Um, I. M.; Min, J . S.; Ahn J . A.; Hahn, H. J . J . Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 5659-5663.
(
13) Bell. R. P. The Proton in Chemistry; Methuen: London, UK,
1
959; p159.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 68, No. 20, 2003 7745