multimetal centers, it would be advantageous to use multi-
dentate ligand systems that can accommodate g3 metal
centers held sufficiently close to one another to enable coop-
erative interactions in reactions with exogeneous substrates.
were required to obtain 2 in reasonable yield. This alkylation
of the “lower rim” of the calix[4]arene was necessary to
maintain the cone conformation15 (which may be varied by
binding alkali metal ions) and ensure that the chelating
N-donors covalently linked to the “upper rim” all remain
above the calix[4]arene frame. In all subsequent steps from
Calixarenes have been found to be a useful scaffold for
constructing such ligands for metalloprotein active site
modeling studies, and complexes typically containing one
or two Cu,8,9 Zn,10 or Ni11 ions have been examined. Higher
nuclearity species with three or four bound metal ions are
less common,10b however, as are those that feature ligands
comprising bidentate9g,10a (rather than tridentate) donors that
would be expected to afford enhanced reactivity at the metal
centers due to greater accessibility of lower coordination
numbers. To address these deficiencies, we targeted a new
class of multidentate ligands that feature three or four
bidentate N-donors attached to the upper rim of a calix[4]-
arene scaffold, and we report their successful syntheses
herein. It is our ultimate hope that the ligand framework,
while providing enough flexibility to incorporate up to four
metal centers, will possess enough rigidity and steric bulk
to prevent intermolecular aggregation yet still bind the metal
ions close enough to facilitate cooperative interactions upon
small molecule activation.
1
2, retention of the cone conformation was confirmed in H
NMR spectra by the presence of two doublets in the range
2.9-3.3 and 4.3-4.6 ppm (J ) 12-13 Hz).15 We attached
three or four chloromethyl groups to 2 to generate 5 and 8,
which were designed to serve as common precursors for the
new target ligands (Scheme 1). Compound 5 had been
reported previously via a one-pot protocol,14 but in our hands
this method proved to be unreliable, so an alternative route
analogous to one reported for disubstituted calix[4]arene
syntheses was developed.16 Thus, 2 was tetraformylated by
an adapted method17 and then reduced and chlorinated to
yield 5. Compound 8 was prepared similarly, by triformyl-
ating 210b followed by reduction and chlorination.
Attachment of secondary amines to the chloromethyl
derivatives 5 and 8 led to the desired ligands (Schemes 2
Scheme 2a
The preparation of the new ligands began with calix[4]-
arene (1),12,13 which was converted to 25,26,27,28-tetrakis-
(2-ethoxyethyl)calix[4]arene (2, Scheme 1) via an adaption
Scheme 1a
a Reagents and conditions: (a) MeCN, xs Na2CO3, 100%.
and 3). The indicated amines were chosen in order to span
a range of donor atom types (amine vs pyridyl), chelate ring
(8) Xie, D.; Gutsche, C. D. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9270-9278.
(9) (a) Blanchard, S.; Clainche, L. L.; Rager, M-N.; Chansou, B.;
Tuchagues, J.; Duprat, A. F.; Mest, Y. L.; Reinaud, O. Angew Chem., Int.
Ed. 1998, 37, 2732-3735. (b) Blanchard, S.; Rager M-N.; Duprat, A. F.;
Reinaud, O. New J. Chem. 1998, 1143-1146. (c) Clainche, L. L.; Giorgi,
M.; Reinaud, O. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3436-3437. (d) Clainche, L. L.;
Giorgi, M.; Reinaud, O. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 1931-1933. (e)
Rondelez, Y.; Se´ne`que, O.; Rager, M.-N.; Duprat, A. F.; Reinaud, O. Chem.
Eur. J. 2000, 6, 4218-4226. (f) Rondelez, Y.; Rager, M.-N.; Duprat, A.;
Reinaud, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1334-1340. (g) Molenveld, P.;
Engbersen, J. F. J.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6726-6737.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) (i) hexamethylenetetramine,
trifluoroacetic acid, 125 °C; (ii) CH2Cl2/1 M HCl; (iii) MeOH, 47%;
(b) (i) EtOH/THF, NaBH4, 4 equiv; (ii) 4 M HCl, 100% (5) and
(8); (c) (i) CH2Cl2/SOCl2, xs; (ii) MeOH, 100% (8) and 60% (5);
(d) ref 10b.
(10) (a) Molenveld, P.; Engbersen, J. F. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 6337-6341. (b) Molenveld, P.; Stikvoort, W. M. G.;
Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Engbersen, J. F. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 3896-3906. (c) Molenveld, P.; Kapsabelis, S.; Engbersen,
J. F. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2948-2949.
(11) Beer, P. D.; Drew, M. G. B.; Leeson, P. B.; Lyssenko, K.; Ogden,
M. I. Chem. Commun. 1995, 929.
of a published procedure.14 In contrast to the original report,
we found that a vast excess of both NaH and 2-bromoethyl
ether, as well as an increased temperature and reaction time,
(12) Gutsche, C. D.; Iqbal, M. In Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York,
1988; Collect. Vol. VIII, p 75.
(7) Selected reviews: (a) Karlin, K. D. Science 1993, 261, 701-708.
(b) Kopf, M.-A.; Karlin, K. D. In Biomimetic Oxidations Catalyzed by
Transition Metal Complexes; Meunier, B., Ed.; Imperial College Press:
London, 2000; pp 309-362. (c) Parkin, G. Chem. Commun. 2000, 1971-
1985. (d) Blackman, A. G.; Tolman, W. B. In Metal-Oxo and Metal-Peroxo
Species in Catalytic Oxidations; Meunier, B., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin,
2000; Vol. 97, pp 179-211.
(13) Gutsche, C. D.; Levine, J. A.; Sujeeth, P. K. J. Org. Chem. 1985,
50, 5802-5806.
(14) Arduini, A.; Casnati, A.; Fabbi, M.; Minari, P.; Pochini, A.; Sicuri,
R.; Ungaro, R. Supramol. Chem. 1993, 1, 235-246.
(15) Ungaro, R. In Calixarenes In Action; Mandolini, L., Ungaro, R.
Eds.; Imperial College Press: London, 2000; pp 1-10.
1392
Org. Lett., Vol. 4, No. 8, 2002