1238
IVANOVA et al.
EXPERIMENTAL
“Research and scientific-pedagogical personnel
of innovation Russia in 2009-2013,” GK no.
02.740.11.0106 and GK no. P1105.
Acetonitrile from Aldrich was not additionally
purified. The water content was determined by Fischer
method, and it did not exceed 0.04%. Solutions of
(C4H9)4NI and perchloric acid were prepared in
acetonitrile. The choice of tetraalkylammonium salts
was determined by the value of the association
constants in acetonitrile [12–15]. All salts were
purified in a Soxhlet apparatus with acetonitrile and
dried in a vacuum (1.33 Pa) at 393K to constant
weight. The method of spectro-photometric titration in
acetonitrile was described in detail in [2, 6].
REFERENCES
1. Koifman, O.I., Mamardashvili, N.Zh., and Antipin, I.S.,
Sinteticheskie retseptory na osnove porfirinov i ikh
kon’yugatov s kaliks4. arenami (Synthetic Receptors
Based on Porphyrins and Their Conjugates with Calix4.
arenes), Moscow: Nauka, 2006.
2. Ivanova, Yu.B., Sheinin, V.B., and Mamardashvili, N.Zh.,
Zh. Obshch. Khim., 2007, vol.77, no. 8, p. 1380.
3. Kruk, N.N., Starukhin, A.S., Mamardashvili, N.Zh.,
et al., Zh. Prikl. Spektr., 2007, vol. 74, no. 6, p. 750.
Porphyrin I was synthesized by the following
procedure. A mixture of pyrrole (0.67 g, 0.01 mol) and
4-chlorbenzaldehyde (1.40 g, 0.01 mol) in propanoic
acid (350 ml) was boiled for 30 min. The reaction
mixture was cooled, the precipitate was filtered off and
successively washed with methanol, hot water, and
again methanol. The residue on the filter was dried and
chromatographed on aluminum oxide, eluent is a
mixture of CH2Cl2 and C6H14, 1:1. Yield 0.97 g, 56%.
Rf 0.37 (Al2O2, CH2Cl2–C6H14, 1:1). Found,%: C
70.18, H 3.42; N 7.41. C44H26N4Cl4. Calculated,%: C
70.21, H 3.46; N 7.45. 1H NMR spectrum (CDCl3), δ,
ppm: 8.70 s (8H, β-CH of pyrrole), 7.60 d (8H, ArH-o),
7.19 d (8H, ArH-m), –2.81 s (2H, NH). EAS
(acetonitrile), λmax, nm (log ε): 644 (4.21) 587 (4.27),
546 (4.31) 512 (4.41), 413 (5.26).
4. Ivanova, Yu.B., Candidate Sci. (Chem.) Dissertation,
Ivanovo, 1994.
5. Ivanova, Yu.B., Kruk, N.N., Starukhin, A.S., and Ma-
mardashvili, N.Zh., Ross. Khim. Zh., 2009, vol. 53,
no. 2, p. 47
6. Ivanova, Yu.B., Churakhina, Yu.I., and Mamardashvi-
li, N.Zh., Zh. Obshch. Khim., 2008, vol. 78, no. 4, p. 691.
7. Kolthoff, I.M., Chantooni, M.K., and Sadhana, I.R.,
Anal. Chem., 1967, vol. 39, no. 13, p. 1627.
8. Fleischer, E., Accounts. Chem. Rev., 1970, vol. 3, p. 105.
9. Kolthoff, I.M., Bruckenstein, S., and Chantooni, M.K.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1961, vol. 83, no. 19, p. 3927.
10. Ivanova, Yu.B., Sheinin, V.B., and Berezin, B.D.,
Abstract of Papers, 3th Russ. Conf. on Chemistry and
Application of Nonaqueous Solutions, Ivanovo, 1993,
p. 213.
11. Ivanova, Yu.B., Sheinin, V.B., and Berezin, B.D.,
Abstract of Papers, 1st Int. Conf. “Actual Problems of
Chemistry and Chemical Technology,” Khimiya-97,
Ivanovo, 1997, p. 41.
12. Evans, P.F., Zawoyski, C., and Kay, R.L., J. Phys.
Chem., 1965, vol. 69, p. 3878.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Russian Foundation
for Basic Research (grants nos. 09-03-00040-a, 09-03-
97500-r_center_a) and the Federal Target Program
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 81 No. 6 2011