Table 1 CD intensity at 417 nm and binding parameters obtained from
Hill’s plots and substitution methods
correlated with the CD intensity, (ii) the largest K is observed
for M4, which is 48- and 39-fold larger, respectively, than those
of M5 and M6 and (iii) the m values are smaller than 2.0,
indicating the weak positive allosterism and the presence of the
1+1 species in the low saccharide concentration region. This
novel binding mode implies that the binding of the first guest
which intramolecularly bridges two boronic acid groups
suppresses the rotational freedom of the porphyrin rings and
preorganises the two residual boronic acids so that they can
easily complex the second guest.
In conclusion, it was shown that the meso–meso-linked
porphyrin dimer is a useful scaffold to separate two boronic acid
groups so that they can show selectivity for oligosaccharides.
We believe that this study is very important in revealing boronic
acid–saccharide interactions toward selective recognition of
oligosaccharides.
CD intensitya/
mdeg
Kb/dm6
mol22
Kc/dm6
mol22
Saccharide
mb
Glucose (M1)
Maltose (M2)
0.2
20.5
20.2
6.8
1.9
1.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.5
2.5 3 103
1.5 3 103
Maltotriose (M3)
Maltotetraose (M4)
Maltopentaose (M5)
Maltohexaose (M6)
Maltoheptaose (M7)
2.0 3 103
6.3 3 105
1.3 3 104
1.6 3 104
2.0 3 103
—
—
—
—
1.7
a See caption of Fig. 1. b Determined from Hill’s plots. c The 1+2 to 1+2
substitution (e.g. from 1·(M4)2 to 1·(M1)2) is assumed for the calculation.
D-glucose is too small to bridge two boronic acid groups, (ii) the
two porphyrin planes are oriented in opposite directions for the
M2, M3 complexes and M4–M7 complexes, respectively, and
(iii) M4 forms a particularly stable complex with 1.
Notes and references
‡ In step iv (Scheme 1), by-products were detected in which the boronic acid
groups were substituted by OH groups. The raw yield of 1 estimated by
HPLC was ca. 20%.
§ Conformations with low potential energy encountered during a 100 ps
MD simulation at 300 K were selected. The system was minimised using
conjugate gradient and Newton–Raphson methods until convergence was
attained for a gradient of 0.01 kcal mol21 Å21. The force field used in this
study was the ESFF.
To obtain further insights into the binding mode, the complex
stoichiometries were estimated by a Job plot method for M4–M7
which show measurable CD intensity. A typical example for M4
is shown in Fig. A(ESI):† a maximum is observed at ([1]/[1] +
[M4]) = 0.33. This supports the view that 1 binds two M4 guests
to form the stable complex. Similar 1+2 stoichiometries were
also observed for M5, M6 and M7. The computational studies
(Discover 3/Insight II 98.0) predict that in the most stable
conformation the two porphyrin planes cross at 90°, in which
the distance between two boron atoms is 1.58 nm. This distance
is comparable with that between the 1,2-diol and 4,6-diol in the
1 For recent comprehensive reviews, see: T. D. James, K. R. A. S.
Sandanayake and S. Shinkai, Supramol. Chem., 1995, 6, 141; T. D.
James, P. Linnane and S. Shinkai, Chem. Commun., 1996, 281; T. D.
James, K. R. A. S. Sandanayake and S. Shinkai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1996, 35, 1910.
2 J. Yoon and A. W. Czarnik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 5874; L. K.
Mohler and A. W. Czarnik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 2998.
3 M.-F. Paugam and B. D. Smith, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 3723; G.
T. Morin, M. P. Hughes, M.-F. Paugam and B. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1994, 116, 8895; P. R. Westmark and B. D. Smith, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1994, 116, 9343.
two terminal -glucose units of M4 (ca. 1.5–1.8 nm). One may
D
thus illustrate a binding mode for the 1+2 1/M4 complex as
shown in Fig. B(ESI).†§
The CD spectra measured as a function of M4–M7 concentra-
tions provided several isosbestic points. As typical examples,
plots of CD intensity at 417 nm vs. [M4] and [M5] are shown in
Fig. 2. The sigmoidal curvatures indicate that the 1+2
complexes are formed in a cooperative manner. Similar
sigmoidal dependences were also observed for M6 and M7. The
binding of the guest to 1 is cooperative. This cooperative guest
binding profile can be analysed with the Hill equation: log [y/(1
2 y)] = mlog[guest] + log K, where K and m are the association
constant and Hill coefficient, respectively, and y = K/
([guest]2m + K).20 From the slope and the intercept obtained
using the linear portion at log [y/(1 2 y)] = 0–0.8 we obtained
K and m values for M4–M7. The determination of K values for
M1–M3 was difficult because of their weak CD intensity, but
measurements were obtained by a substitution method using the
1·M4 complex, that is, by the CD intensity decrease induced by
addition of M1–M3, and the results are summarised in Table 1.
Examination of Table 1 reveals that: (i) the magnitude of K is
4 Y. Nagai, K. Kobayashi, H. Toi and Y. Aoyama, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.,
1993, 66, 2965.
5 G. Wulff, B. Heide and G. Helfmeier, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108,
1089; G. Wulff and H.-G. Poll, Makromol. Chem., 1987, 188, 741.
6 C. R. Cooper and T. D. James, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1419.
7 M. Takeuchi, M. Yamamoto and S. Shinkai, Chem. Commun., 1997,
1731.
8 T. Mizuno, M. Takeuchi, I. Hamachi, K. Nakashima and S. Shinkai,
Chem. Commun., 1997, 1793.
9 K. Tsukagoshi and S. Shinkai, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 4089; Y.
Shiomi, M. Saisho, K. Tsukagoshi and S. Shinkai, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1, 1993, 2111.
10 T. D. James, T. Harada and S. Shinkai, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1993, 857.
11 K. Nakashima and S. Shinkai, Chem. Lett., 1995, 443; K. R. A. S.
Sandanayake, T. D. James and S. Shinkai, Chem. Lett., 1995, 503.
12 J. C. Norrild and H. Eggert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 1479.
13 T. D. James, K. R. A. S. Sandanayake, R. Iguchi and S. Shinkai, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 8982 and references therein.
14 J. P. Lorand and J. O. Edwards, J. Org. Chem., 1959, 24, 769.
15 H. Murakami, T. Nagasaki, I. Hamachi and S. Shinkai, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1993, 34, 6273; J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1994, 975; T.
Imada, H. Murakami and S. Shinkai, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1994, 1557; S. Arimori, H. Murakami, M. Takeuchi and S. Shinkai,
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 961; S. Arimori, M. Takeuchi
and S. Shinkai, Chem. Lett., 1996, 77; J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
245.
16 K. Kondo, Y. Shiomi, M. Saisho, T. Harada and S. Shinkai,
Tetrahedron, 1992, 48, 8239.
17 K. R. A. S. Sandanayake, K. Nakashima and S. Shinkai, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun., 1994, 1621.
18 H. Kijima, M. Takeuchi and S. Shinkai, Chem. Lett., 1998, 781.
19 A. Nakano, A. Osuka, I. Yamazaki, T. Yamazaki and Y. Nishimura,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 3023; T. Ogawa, Y. Nishimoto, N.
Yoshida, N. Ono and A. Osuka, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 176
and references therein.
Fig. 2 Plots of CD intensity (417 nm) for 1 (5.00 3 1026 mol dm23) vs. [M4]
and [M5].
20 K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, John Wiley, New York, 1987.
1048
Chem. Commun., 2000, 1047–1048