Electron-Transfer Reduction of a Quinone
A R T I C L E S
a hydrogen bond with H+:B instead of direct protonation, when
:B acts as the stronger base than A•- (Scheme 1b).9–13 The
interplay between ET and hydrogen bonding plays a crucial role
in biological redox systems, for example, specific hydrogen
bonds between nearby protonated amino acid residues and two
quinones (termed QA and QB) determines the direction of an
electron flow in photosynthetic reaction center.14,15
Scheme 2
One may regard such H+ and H+:B-promoted ET as proton-
coupled electron transfer (PCET). Although the precise defini-
tion of PCET has yet to be widely accepted,16 this term is often
applied to the mechanism in which the proton and electron are
transferred in one single kinetic step.17 It is therefore to be
contrasted with the stepwise pathway that involves mechanisti-
cally distinct ET and proton transfer (PT) steps. The one-step
pathway is generally thermodynamically more favorable than
the stepwise pathway, because the one-step pathway avoids
high-energy intermediates through the concerted electron–proton
transfer.16 Similarly, ET coupled with protonation (or hydrogen-
bond formation) [Scheme 1 green arrows] should be thermo-
dynamically more favorable than ET followed by protonation
(or hydrogen-bond formation) [Scheme 1 red and blue arrows].3,4
However, the one-step ET mechanism would be changed to the
stepwise mechanism, when the driving force of the initial ET
(Scheme 1 blue arrows) significantly increases. With regard to
such a mechanistic dichotomy,18 an important question arises:
are both pathways employed simultaneously? Alternatively, is
there a mechanistic continuity? However, such a mechanistic
dichotomy, including the interplay between ET and hydrogen
bonding (Scheme 1b), has yet to be scrutinized.
There is also a mechanistic dichotomy in hydride transfer of
dihydronicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) and ana-
logues, that is, one-step hydride transfer (green arrows) and ET
followed by proton–electron (blue and red arrows) [or hydrogen
(black arrows)] transfer as shown in Scheme 2.19–22 NADH is
an important source of two electrons and a proton in biological
redox reactions,23 and thereby always has been of general
interest to chemists.19–22,24–30 Hydride-transfer reactions of
¨
(8) Adelroth, P.; Paddock, M. L.; Sagle, L. B.; Feher, G.; Okamura, M. Y.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 13086.
(9) For redox modulation by neutral hydrogen-bond donors, see: (a)
Rotello, V. M. In Electron Transfer in Chemistry; Balzani, V., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001; Vol. 4, pp 68–87. (b) Niemz,
A.; Rotello, V. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 44. (c) Greaves, M. D.;
Niemz, A.; Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 266. (d)
Gray, M.; Cuello, A. O.; Cooke, G.; Rotello, V. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 7882. (e) Jordan, B. J.; Pollier, M. A.; Miller, L. A.;
Tiernan, C.; Clavier, G.; Audebert, P.; Rotello, V. M. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 2835.
(10) Ammonium cations promote ET reductions of quinones by hydrogen-
bond formation with semiquinone radical anions, see: Okamoto, K.;
Ohkubo, K.; Kadish, K. M.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004,
108, 10405.
(11) For effects of intramolecular hydrogen bonding on ET, see: (a) Rhile,
I. J.; Markle, T. F.; Nagao, H.; DiPasquale, A. G.; Lam, O. P.;
Lockwood, M. A.; Rotter, K.; Mayer, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 6075. (b) Sjödin, M.; Irebo, T.; Utas, J. E.; Lind, J.; Merényi,
G.; Åkermark, B.; Hammarström, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
13076. (c) Costentin, C.; Robert, M.; Savéant, J.-M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 9953. (d) Fukuzumi, S.; Yoshida, Y.; Okamoto, K.;
Imahori, H.; Araki, Y.; Ito, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6794.
(e) Fukuzumi, S.; Okamoto, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Imahori, H.; Araki, Y.;
Ito, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1007. (f) Okamoto, K.; Fukuzumi,
S. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005, 109, 7713.
(18) For the mechanistic dichotomy between stepwise and concerted PCET,
see: (a) Sjödin, M.; Styring, S.; Wolpher, H.; Xu, Y.; Sun, L.;
Hammarström, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3855. (b) Lebeau,
E. L.; Binstead, R. A.; Meyer, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
10535. (c) Mayer, J. M.; Rhile, I. J Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004,
1655, 51.
(19) (a) Fukuzumi, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Tanaka, T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1989, 1037. (b) Fukuzumi, S.; Mochizuki, S.; Tanaka, T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1497. (c) Fukuzumi, S.; Ishikawa, M.;
Tanaka, T. Chem. Lett. 1989, 1227.
(12) Extraordinarily large deuterium kinetic isotope effects were observed
in a proton-coupled electron-transfer reaction of p-benzoquinone with
an osmium complex containing a phosphorus-hydrogen bond; see:
Huynh, M. H. V.; Meyer, T. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2004,
101, 13138.
(20) (a) Carlson, B. W.; Miller, L. L J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 479.
(b) Miller, L. L.; Valentine, J. R J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3982.
(21) (a) Coleman, C. A.; Rose, J. G.; Murray, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 9755. (b) Murray, C. J.; Webb, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 7426.
(13) For proton-coupled electron transfer in hydrogen-bonded donor-
acceptor assemblies; see: (a) Roberts, J. A.; Kirby, J. P.; Nocera, D. G.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8051. (b) Kirby, J. P.; Roberts, J. A.;
Nocera, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9230. (c) Hodgkiss, J. M.;
Damrauer, N. H.; Pressé, S.; Rosenthal, J.; Nocera, D. G. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2006, 110, 18853.
(22) We have recently reported a mechanistic borderline between one-step
and stepwise mechanisms in Sc3+-promoted hydride transfer and
hydrogen transfer of an NADH analogue; see: (a) Yuasa, J.; Yamada,
S.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14938. (b) Yuasa, J.;
Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14281.
(14) (a) O’Malley, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5093. (b) O’Malley,
P. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 248.
(23) Stryer, L. Biochemistry, 3rd ed.; Freeman: New York, 1988; Chapter
17.
(15) A part of preliminary results on direct ESR detection of a hydrogen-
bonded complex between semiquinone radical anion of 1-(p-tolyl-
(24) (a) Fukuzumi, S.; Tanaka, T. Photoinduced Electron Transfer; Fox,
M. A., Chanon, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988;
Part C, Chapter 10. (b) Fukuzumi, S. AdVances in Electron Transfer
Chemistry; Mariano, P. S., Ed.; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1992; pp
67–175.
sulfinyl)-2,5-benzoquinone and protonated histidine (TolSQ•-
/
His·2H+) has appeared; see : Yuasa, J.; Yamada, S.; Fukuzumi, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3553.
(16) For various definitions and examples of PCET, see: (a) Mayer, J. M.
Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 2004, 55, 363. (b) Cukier, R. I.; Nocera, D. G.
Annu. ReV. Phys. Chem. 1998, 49, 337. (c) Kohen, A.; Klinman, J. P.
Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 397. (d) Hammes-Schiffer, S . Acc. Chem.
Res. 2001, 34, 273. (e) Stubbe, J.; Nocera, D. G.; Yee, C. S.; Chang,
M. C. Y. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2167. (f) Chang, C. J.; Chang,
M. C. Y.; Damrauer, N. H.; Nocera, D. G. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
2004, 1655, 13. (g) Hammes-Schiffer, S. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3,
33. (h) Hammes-Schiffer, S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 93.
(17) Such concerted proton-electron transfer reactions have recently been
termed as concerted proton-electron transfer (CPET); see: Costentin,
C.; Evans, D. H.; Robert, M.; Savéant, J.-M.; Singh, P. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 12490.
(25) Gebicki, J.; Marcinek, A.; Zielonka, J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 379.
(26) (a) Eisner, U.; Kuthan, J. Chem. ReV. 1972, 72, 1. (b) Stout, D. M.;
Meyers, A. I. Chem. ReV. 1982, 82, 223.
(27) (a) Pestovsky, O.; Bakac, A.; Espenson, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 13422. (b) Pestovsky, O.; Bakac, A.; Espenson, J. H. Inorg. Chem.
1998, 37, 1616.
(28) Zhu, X.-Q.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Cheng, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 15298.
(29) For direct observation of NADH•+ analogues by the transient ESR
spectrum in the oxidation of NADH analogues by one-electron
oxidants, see: (a) Fukuzumi, S.; Tokuda, Y.; Kitano, T.; Okamoto,
T.; Otera, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 8960. (b) Fukuzumi, S.; Inada,
O.; Suenobu, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4808.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 17, 2008 5809