1068
Z. Guo et al.
LETTER
aldehyde 6a and ester 7a respectively in 1:19 and 0:1 by Sasaki and us with oxidations of 1 and 5 by several
ratios [Table 1, entries (i) and (ii)].
other reagents, dimerization was observed only with
Cr(VI)/pyridine based reagents.10,11 Indeed Sasaki and co-
workers found that a 5:2 ratio of the desired aldehyde 2c
and ester 4c was optimum for various Cr(VI) reagents that
were tried.1
However, that the a-oxygen is not necessary for dimeriza-
tion to occur is apparent from entries (iii)–(vi). Thus sub-
strates 5c, 5d, and 5e, which contain hydroxyethyl
residues, also gave appreciable amounts of dimeric esters
(e.g. 7). The nucleofugal character of aldehyde 6d was In light of the transition metal connection, it is noteworthy
also evident in the attempted DIBALH reduction of ester that use of the Swern DMSO–oxalyl chloride12 reagent af-
8, which afforded the Claisen condensation product 9 forded a 75% yield of 6a (Table, entry vii). Similarly,
(Scheme 3).
Dess–Martin Periodinane13 oxidation of 5a14 gave a 72%
yield of 6a (Table 1, entry viii).
Table 1 Oxidation of some Hydroxymethyl-containing Substrates:
Avoidance of Tishchenko-Like Dimerization Products
It therefore appears that the Tishchenko-like ester forma-
tion in oxidation of primary alcohols can be avoided by
refraining from using Cr(VI)-based reagents.
Entry
(i)
Substrate Oxidant
Ratio 6:7 Overall
yield
5a
5b
5c
5d
5d
5e
5b
5b
PCC, NaOAc
CH2Cl2
–:1
1:19
3:1
7:3
3:7
3:7
1:–
1:–
20%
33%
15%
12%
23%
33%
75%
75%
References
(1) Ermolenko, L.; Sasaki, N. A.; Potier, P. Synlett 2001, 1565.
(2) Yunker, M. B.; Fraser-Reid, B. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1975, 61.
(ii)
PCC, NaOAc
CH2Cl2
(3) Synthesis of Ester 7b from 5b with PCC: To a stirred
mixture of PCC (129.4 g), sodium acetate (49.2 g),
molecular sieves (120 g) in CH2Cl2 (600 mL) at ambient
temperature was added a solution of alcohol 5b (38.8 g) in
100 mL of CH2Cl2. After 5 h, the mixture was filtered
through a pad of Celite and washed with CH2Cl2. The
combined filtrate and washings was passed through a pad of
celite and a pad of silica gel. Removal of the solvent by
rotatory evaporation gave 50 g crude product mixture with a
6b:7b ratio of 1:19 estimated by 1H NMR. Pure 7b (5.2 g)
was obtained from 10 g of the crude product mixture by flash
chromatography eluted with hexane–EtOAc (7:3). 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d = 7.2–7.3 (m, 10 H), 5.3–5.5 (2 s, 2 H), 3.6–4.6
(m, 10 H), 1.2–2.2 (m, 6 H) ppm. 13C NMR (CDCl3): d =
170.5, 139.0, 138.5, 129.5 (2 C), 129.38 (2 C), 128.74 (2 C),
126.85 (2 C), 126.68 (2 C), 101.78, 101.69, 75.95, 75.16,
67.49, 67.13, 67.03, 28.75, 28.00 ppm. GC-MS: 384 (M).
(4) Tishchenko, J. Russ. Phys. Chem. Soc. 1906, 38, 355.
(5) (a) Saegusa, T.; Ueshima, T. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 3310.
(b) Buehler, C. A.; Pearson, D. E. Survey of Organic
Synthesis, Vol. 2; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1977,
754. (c) March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed;
John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1992, 235.
(6) Ito, J.; Horino, H.; Koshiro, Y.; Yamamoto, A. Bull. Chem.
Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 504.
(7) For a review see: Geissman, T. A. Org. React. 1944, 2, 94.
(8) Stapp, P. R. J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 1433.
(9) Yamashita, M.; Watanbe, Y.; Mitsudo, T.; Takegami, Y.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1976, 49, 3597.
(10) Corey, E. J.; Schmidt, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 5, 399.
(11) Piancatelli, G.; Scettri, A.; D’Aure, M. Synthesis 1982, 245.
(12) Mancuso, A. J.; Huang, S.-L.; Swern, D. J. Org. Chem.
1978, 47, 2480.
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
PCC, NaOAc
CH2Cl2
PCC, NaOAc
CH2Cl2
PCC, NaOAc
CH2Cl2
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
PCC, NaOAc
CH2Cl2
DMSO
COCl2
Dess–Martin
In the 1975 publication, we suggested that the ester-for-
mation was reminiscent of a Tischenko aldehyde-ester
disproportionation.4,5 Although the mechanism proposed
for the reaction6 involves an intramolecular hydride trans-
fer, the Tishchenko reaction occurs readily in aldehydes
with an a-hydrogen-unlike in Canizzarro reactions.7 In-
deed we now report relevant examples in Table 1, entries
(iii)–(iv).
Furthermore, it is notable that the Tishchenko-coupling7
can be induced by a variety of ‘complexation’ catalysts in-
cluding boric acid,8 iron carbonyls,9 and hydroruthenium
complexes.6 In view of this fact, it is noteworthy that al-
though ‘difficulties’ and/or poor yields were experienced
OH
O
O
O
+8
O
O
DIBAL-H
6d
O
CO2Me
CO2Me
9
8
Scheme 3
Synlett 2003, No. 7, 1067–1069 ISSN 1234-567-89 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York